Article Data

  • Views 425
  • Dowloads 122

Original Research

Open Access

Carcinosarcoma of the ovary: a single institution experience and review of the literature

  • M.J. Kanis1,*,
  • V. Kolev1
  • J. Getrajdman1
  • K. Zakashansky1
  • C. Cohen1
  • J. Rahaman1

1Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo2790.2016 Vol.37,Issue 1,February 2016 pp.75-79

Published: 10 February 2016

*Corresponding Author(s): M.J. Kanis E-mail: mjkanis@gmail.com

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the management and outcome in patients with advanced stage primary carcinosarcoma (CS) of the ovary in a single institution. Materials and Methods: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of all patients treated for CS of the ovary between 1994 and 2011. The medical records, operative reports and pathology records were abstracted for baseline characteristics, surgical staging, degree of cytoreduction and chemotherapy regimens used. Standard statistical methods for analysis of the data were used. Results: A total of 33 patients with ovarian CS were identified. Of these, 28 records were available for analysis. One patient was Stage I (3.5%), two were Stage II (11.1%), 20 were Stage III (71.4%), and five (17.9%) were Stage IV. The early stage (Stage I and II) patients were excluded from analysis. Of the 25 advanced stage (III and IV) patients, 21 (84.0%) were optimally cytoreduced to a residual disease of < one cm and four (16.0%) were suboptimally cytoreduced. The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were ten and 21 months, respectively, for advanced stages. Twenty-one (75%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and 62% (13 of 21) of treated patients received paclitaxel/carboplatin (T/C) as first-line chemotherapy. The median PFS and OS were 15.6 and 31.7 months, respectively, for those treated with T/C. There was no difference in PFS (p = 0.42) and OS (p = 0.91) between the patients who received T/C vs. other chemotherapy regimens as a first-line adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with optimal cytoreduction had an improved PFS compared to those with suboptimal cytoreduction (ten vs. four months p = 0.015); however, there was no difference in OS (21 vs. 13 p = 0.117). The two-year OS was 48.0%. In the preset study, PFS was improved in patients who were optimally cytoreduced at the time of diagnosis. Conclusion: T/C is an active regimen in the treatment of ovarian CS and has the potential to be the backbone for addition of biologic targeted therapies in the future. For advanced ovarian CS the authors recommend optimal cytoreductive surgery followed by T/C chemotherapy.

Keywords

Ovarian carcinosarcoma; Carboplatin; Cytoreductive surgery; Paclitaxel.

Cite and Share

M.J. Kanis,V. Kolev,J. Getrajdman,K. Zakashansky,C. Cohen,J. Rahaman. Carcinosarcoma of the ovary: a single institution experience and review of the literature. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2016. 37(1);75-79.

References

[1] Siegel R., Ma J., Zou Z., Jemal A.: “Cancer statistics”. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2014, 64, 9. doi: 10.3322/caac.21208. Epub 2014 Jan 7.

[2] Duman B.B., Kara I.O., Gunaldi M., Ercolak V.: “Malignant mixed Mullerian tumor of the ovary with two cases and review of the literature”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2011, 283, 1363.

[3] Rauh-Hain J.A., Growdon W.B., Rodriguez N., Goodman A.K., Boruta D.M., Schorge J.O., et al.: “Carcinosarcoma of the ovary: a case-control study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 121, 477.

[4] Brown E., Stewart M., Rye T., Al-Nafussi A., Williams A.R., Bradburn M., Smyth J., Gabra H.: “Carcinosarcoma of the ovary: 19 years of prospective data from a single center”. Cancer, 2004, 100, 2148.

[5] Ko M.L., Jeng C.J., Huang S.H., Shen J., Tzeng C.R., Chen S.C.: “Primary peritoneal carcinosarcoma (malignant mixed mullerian tumor): Report of a case with five-year disease free survival after surgery and chemoradiation and a review of literature”. Acta Oncol., 2005, 44, 756.

[6] Sood A.K., Sorosky J.I., Gelder M.S., Buller R.E., Anderson B., Wilkinson E.J., et al.: “Primary ovarian sarcoma: analysis of prognostic variables and the role of surgical cytoreduction”. Cancer, 1998, 82, 1731.

[7] Plaxe S.C., Dottino P.R., Goodman H.M., Deligdisch L., Idelson M., Cohen C.J.: “Clinical features of advanced ovarian mixed mesodermal tumors and treatment with doxorubicin- and cis-platinum-based chemotherapy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1990, 37, 244.

[8] Rauh-Hain J.A., Shoni M., Schorge J.O., Goodman A., Horowitz N.S., del Carmen M.G.: “Prognostic determinants in patients with uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma”. J. Reprod. Med., 2013, 58, 297.

[9] Mok J.E., Kim Y.M., Jung M.H., Kim K.R., Kim D.Y., Kim J.H., et al.: “Malignant mixed mullerian tumors of the ovary: experience with cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based combination chemotherapy”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2006, 16, 101.

[10] Muntz H.G., Jones M.A., Goff B.A., Fuller A.F. Jr., Nikrui N., Rice L.W., Tarraza H.M.: “Malignant mixed mullerian tumors of the ovary: experience with surgical cytoreduction and combination chemotherapy”. Cancer, 1995, 76, 1209.

[11] Sit A.S., Price F.V., Kelley J.L., Comerci J.T., Kunschner A.J., Kanbour- Shakir A., Edwards R.P.: “Chemotherapy for malignant mixed Mullerian tumors of the ovary”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 79, 196.

[12] Barakat R.R., Rubin S.C., Wong G., Saigo P.E., Markman M., Hoskins W.J.: “Mixed mesodermal tumor of the ovary: analysis of prognostic factors in 31 cases”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1992, 80, 660.

[13] Barnholtz-Sloan J.S., Morris R., Malone J.M. Jr., Munkarah A.R.: “Survival of women diagnosed with malignant, mixed mullerian tumors of the ovary (OMMMT)”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 93, 506.

[14] Le T., Krepart G.V., Lotocki R.J., Heywood M.S.: “Malignant mixed mesodermal ovarian tumor treatment and prognosis: a 20-year experience”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1997, 65, 237.

[15] Duska L.R., Garrett A., Eltabbakh G.H., Oliva E., Penson R., Fuller A.F.:P”aclitaxel and platinum chemotherapy for malignant mixed mullerian tumors of the ovary”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2002, 85, 459.

[16] Dai Y., Shen K., Lang J.H., Huang H.F., Pan L.Y., Wu M., et al.: “Primary sarcoma of the ovary: clinicopathological characteristics, prognostic factors and evaluation of therapy”. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.), 2011, 124, 1316.

[17] Rutledge T.L., Gold M.A., McMeekin D.S., Huh W.K., Powell M.A., Lewin S.N., et al.: “Carcinosarcoma of the ovary-a case series”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 100, 128.

[18] Silasi D.A., Illuzzi J.L., Kelly M.G., Rutherford T.J., Mor G., Azodi M., Schwartz P.E.: “Carcinosarcoma of the ovary”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2008, 18, 22.

[19] Chun K.C., Kim J.J., Kim D.Y., Kim J.H., Kim Y.M., Nam J.H., Kim Y.T.: “Optimal debulking surgery followed by paclitaxel/platinum chemotherapy is very effective in treating ovarian carcinosarcomas: a single center experience”. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest., 2011, 72, 208.

[20] Morrow C.P., Bundy B.N., Hoffman J., Sutton G., Homesley H.: “A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.Adriamycin chemotherapy for malignant mixed mesodermal tumor of the ovary”. Am. J. Clin. Oncol., 1986, 9, 24.

[21] Sutton G.P., Blessing J.A., Homesley H.D., Malfetano J.H.: “ A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. A phase II trial of ifosfamide and mesna in patients with advanced or recurrent mixed mesodermal tumors of the ovary previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1994, 53, 24.

[22] Anderson B., Turner D.A., Benda J.: “Ovarian sarcoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1987, 26, 183.

[23] del Carmen M.G., Birrer M., Schorge J.O.: “Carcinosarcoma of the ovary: a review of the literature”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 125, 271.

[24] Tate Thigpen J., Blessing J.A., DeGeest K., Look K.Y., Homesley H.D.: “Cisplatin as initial chemotherapy in ovarian carcinosarcomas: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 93, 336.

[25] Thigpen J.T., Blessing J.A., Beecham J., Homesley H., Yordan E.: “Phase II trial of cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent uterine sarcomas: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 1991, 9, 1962.

[26] Sutton G., Brunetto V.L., Kilgore L., Soper J.T., McGehee R., Olt G., et al.: “A phase III trial of ifosfamide with or without cisplatin in carcinoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 79, 147.

[27] Homesley H.D., Filaci V., Markman M., Bitterman P., Eaton L., Kilgore L.C., et al.: “Phase III trial of ifosfamide with or without paclitaxel in advanced uterine carcinosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2007, 25, 526.

[28] Powell M.A., Filiaci V.L., Rose P.G., Mannel R.S., Hanjani P., Degeest K., et al.: “Phase II evaluation of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2010, 28, 2727.

[29] Terada K.Y., Johnson T.L., Hopkins M., Roberts J.A.: “Clinicopathologic features of ovarian mixed mesodermal tumors and carcinosarcomas”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1989, 32, 228.

[30] Ariyoshi K., Kawauchi S., Kaku T., Nakano H., Tsuneyoshi M.: “Prognostic factors in ovarian carcinosarcoma: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 23 cases”. Histopathology, 2000 37, 427.

[31] Leiser A.L., Chi D.S., Ishill N.M., Tew W.P.: “Carcinosarcoma of the ovary treated with platinum and taxane: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 105, 657.

[32] Harris M.A., Delap L.M., Sengupta P.S., Wilkinson P.M., Welch R.S., Swindell R., et al.: “Carcinosarcoma of the ovary”. Br. J. Cancer, 2003, 88, 654.

[33] Loizzi V., Cormio G., Camporeale A., Falagario M., De Mitri P., Scardigno D., et al.: “Carcinosarcoma of the ovary: analysis of 13 cases and review of the literature”. Oncology, 2011, 80, 102.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top