Article Data

  • Views 1590
  • Dowloads 127

Case Reports

Open Access

Pattern of distribution and metastasis of deep obturator and parametrial lymph nodes in early stage cervical cancer patients

  • Fei Sun1,2
  • Xiao-jing Wang1
  • Ze-biao Ma1
  • Mu-yan Cai3
  • Ying Xiong1,*,

1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China

3Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo2853.2016 Vol.37,Issue 3,June 2016 pp.332-337

Published: 10 June 2016

*Corresponding Author(s): Ying Xiong E-mail: sf99609248@126.com

Abstract

Pelvic lymphadenectomy has been widely performed as an essential part of the surgical treatment of early stage (IB-IIA) cervical cancer. In this study, the authors reviewed 128 patients who underwent this type of dissection to investigate the pattern of distribution and metastasis of deep obturator lymph node (DOLN) and parametrial lymph node (PLN), and the clinical hitstological factors that associated with detection of and metastasis to DOLN and PLN. The authors found the detection of DOLN and PLN significantly less common and more frequently unilateral compared with other groups of pelvic nodes. Tumor size and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen may help to identify patients suitable for individualized dissection of PLN.


Keywords

Cervical cancer; Deep obturator lymph node; Parametrial lymph node; Distribution; Metastasis.


Cite and Share

Fei Sun,Xiao-jing Wang,Ze-biao Ma,Mu-yan Cai,Ying Xiong. Pattern of distribution and metastasis of deep obturator and parametrial lymph nodes in early stage cervical cancer patients. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2016. 37(3);332-337.

References

[1] Benedetti-Panici P., Maneschi F., Scambia G., Greggi S., Cutillo G, D'Andrea G., et al.: “Lymphatic spread of cervical cancer: an anatomical and pathological study based on 225 radical hysterectomies with systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1996, 62, 19.

[2] Sakuragi N., Fujimoto S., Satoh C., Takeda N., Hareyama H., Takeda M., et al.: “Incidence and distribution pattern of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with Stages IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy”. Cancer, 1999, 85, 1547.

[3] Pieterse Q.D., Kenter G.G., Gaarenstroom K.N., Peters A.A.W., Willems S.M., Fleuren G.J., et al.: “The number of pelvic lymph nodes in the quality control and prognosis of radical hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical cancer”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2007, 33, 216.

[4] Lee J., Lee K., Lee S., Park C.: “Pattern of lymph node metastasis and the optimal extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in FIGO stage IB cervical cancer”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2007, 33, 288.

[5] Panici P.B., Scambia G., Baiocchi G., Matonti G., Capelli A., Mancuso S.: “Anatomical study of para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes in gynecologic malignancies”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1992, 79, 498.

[6] Piura B., Rabinovich A., Friger M.: “Number and distribution of pelvic lymph nodes and effect of surgical pathologic factors on pelvic lymph node status in patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2006, 27, 463.

[7] Girardi F., Lichtenegger W., Tamussino K., Haas J.: “The importance of parametrial lymph nodes in the treatment of cervical cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1989, 34, 206.

[8] Benedetti-Panici P., Maneschi F., Andrea G., Cutillo G., Rabitti C., Congiu M., et al.: “Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study”. Cancer, 2000, 89, 2267.

[9] Kodama J., Kusumoto T., Nakamura K., Seki N., Hongo A., Hiramatsu Y.: “Factors associated with parametrial involvement in stage IB1 cervical cancer and identification of patients suitable for less radical surgery”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 122, 491.

[10] Sakuragi N.: “Up-to-date management of lymph node metastasis and the role of tailored lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer”. Int. J. Clin. Oncol., 2007, 12, 165.

[11] Höckel M., Konerding M.A., Heussel C.P.: “Liposuction-assisted nerve-sparing extended radical hysterectomy: oncologic rationale, surgical anatomy, and feasibility study”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1998, 178, 971.

[12] Lanowska M., Morawietz L., Sikora A., Raber G., Mangler M., Speiser D., et al.: “Prevalence of lymph nodes in the parametrium of radical vaginal trachelectomy(RVT) specimen”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 121, 298.

[13] Diaz J.P., Gemignani M.L., Pandit-Taskar N., Park K.J., Murray M.P., Chi D.S., et al.: “Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of early-stage cervical carcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 120, 347.

[14] Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., Murray T., Xu J., Smigal C., et al.: “Cancer statistics 2006”. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2006, 56, 106.

[15] Wright J.D., Grigsby P.W., Brooks R., Powell M.A., Gibb R.K., Gao F., et al.: “Utility of parametrectomy for early stage cervical cancer treated with radicalhysterectomy”. Cancer, 2007, 110, 1281.

[16] Frumovitz M., Sun C.C., Schmeler K.M., Deavers M.T., Dos Reis R., Levenback C.F., et al.: “Parametrial involvement in radical hysterectomy specimens for women with early-stage cervical cancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2009, 114, 93.

[17] Steed H., Capstick V., Schepansky A., Honore L., Hiltz M., Faught W.: “Early cervical cancer and parametrial involvement: is it significant?” Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 103, 53.

[18] Strnad P., Robova H., Skapa P., Pluta M., Hrehorcak M., Halaska M., et al.: “A prospective study of sentinel lymph node status and parametrial involvement in patients with small tumour volume cervical cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 109, 280.

Abstracted / indexed in

Web of Science (WOS) (On Hold)

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition

Google Scholar

JournalSeek

Submission Turnaround Time

Top