Article Data

  • Views 528
  • Dowloads 112

Original Research

Open Access

Trends in the utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage endometrial cancer: a SEER-Medicare study

  • G. Garg1,*,
  • K. Schwartz2
  • S. Kumar3
  • R. T. Morris4
  • R. Ali-Fehmi5

1Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Flint, MI

2Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI

3Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Baptist Hospital, Memphis, TN

4Division of Gynecologic Oncology and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI

5Department of Pathology and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI (USA)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo3838.2017 Vol.38,Issue 4,August 2017 pp.547-554

Published: 10 August 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): G. Garg E-mail: gunjalgarg@yahoo.com

Abstract

Purpose of Investigation: To examine the utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy in treatment of patients with early stage endometrial cancer in the United States. Materials and Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database was used to identify women 65 years or older diagnosed with Stage I/II endometrial cancer from 1991 through 2007. Results: A total of 12,885 women met the eligibility criteria. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 2.7% of the patients. In multivariable analysis of predictors of chemotherapy, age ≤ 80 years, residence in northeast region of the United States, diagnosis between years 2003-2007, high tumor grade, non-endometrioid histology, and higher stage disease showed a significant positive association (p < 0.05). The usage of chemotherapy increased from 1.5% between years 1991-1994 to 4.2% between years 2003-2007. Conclusion: This population-based study shows an increasing trend in the usage of adjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of women with early stage endometrial cancer.

Keywords

Trends; Chemotherapy; Early-stage endometrial cancer.

Cite and Share

G. Garg,K. Schwartz,S. Kumar,R. T. Morris,R. Ali-Fehmi. Trends in the utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage endometrial cancer: a SEER-Medicare study. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2017. 38(4);547-554.

References

[1] Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A.: “Cancer statistics, 2015”. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2015, 65, 5.

[2] Cardenes H.R., Look K., Michael H.: “ Endometrium”. In: Halperin E.C., Perez C.A., Brady L.W. (eds). Perez and Brady’s principles and practice of radiation oncology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2008, 1610.

[3] Mariani A., Dowdy S.C., Keeney G.L., Long H.J., Lesnick T.G., Podratz K.C.: “High-risk endometrial cancer subgroups: candidates for target-based adjuvant therapy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 95, 120.

[4] Hogberg T., Signorelli M., de Oliveira C.F., Fossati R., Lissoni A.A., Sorbe B., et al.: “Sequential adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in endometrial cancer—results from two randomised studies”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2010, 46, 2422.

[5] Susumu N., Sagae S., Udagawa Y., Niwa K., Kuramoto H., Satoh S., et al.: “Randomized phase III trial of pelvic radiotherapy versus cisplatin-based combined chemotherapy in patients with intermediateand high-risk endometrial cancer: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 108, 226

[6] Suh D.H., Lee K.H., Kim K., Kang S., Kim J.W.: “Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2014”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2015, 26, 156

[7] Maggi R., Lissoni A., Spina F., Melpignano M., Zola P., Favalli G., et al.: “Adjuvant chemotherapy vs radiotherapy in high-risk endometrial carcinoma: results of a randomised trial”. Br. J. Cancer, 2006, 95, 266.

[8] Wright J.D., Neugut A.I., Wilde E.T., Buono D.L., Malin J., Tsai W.Y., et al.: “Physician characteristics and variability of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use among Medicare patients with cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2011, 29, 3408.

[9] Klabunde C.N., Warren J.L., Legler J.M.: “Assessing comorbidity using claims data: an overview”. Med. Care, 2002, 40, 26.

[10] Klabunde C.N., Potosky A.L., Legler J.M., Warren J.L.: “Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data”. J. Clin. Epidemiol., 2000, 53, 1258.

[11] Murphy K.T., Rotmensch J., Yamada S.D., Mundt A.J.: “Outcome and patterns of failure in pathologic stages I-IV clear-cell carcinoma of the endometrium: implications for adjuvant radiation therapy”. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2003, 55, 1272.

[12] Mundt A.J., Murphy K.T., Rotmensch J., Waggoner S.E., Yamada S.D., Connell P.P.: “Surgery and postoperative radiation therapy in FIGO Stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma”. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2001, 50, 1154

[13] Fader A.N., Drake R.D., O’Malley D.M., Gibbons H.E., Huh W.K., Havrilesky L.J., et al.: “Platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy favorably impacts survival outcomes in stage I uterine papillary serous carcinoma”. Cancer, 2009, 115, 2119.

[14] Huh W.K., Powell M., Leath C.A. 3rd, Straughn J.M. Jr., Cohn D.E., Gold M.A., et al.: “Uterine papillary serous carcinoma: comparisons of outcomes in surgical Stage I patients with and without adjuvant therapy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2003, 91, 470.

[15] Sutton G., Axelrod J.H., Bundy B.N., Roy T., Homesley H., Lee R.B., et al.: “Adjuvant whole abdominal irradiation in clinical stages I and II papillary serous or clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium: a phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 100, 349.

[16] Sood B.M., Jones J., Gupta S., Khabele D., Guha C., Runowicz C., et al.: “Patterns of failure after the multimodality treatment of uterine papillary serous carcinoma”. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2003, 57, 208.

[17] Dietrich C.S. 3rd, Modesitt S.C., DePriest P.D., Ueland F.R., Wilder J., Reedy M.B., et al.: “The efficacy of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in Stage I uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC)”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 99, 557.

[18] Havrilesky L.J., Secord A.A., Bae-Jump V., Ayeni T., Calingaert B., Clarke-Pearson D.L., et al.: “Outcomes in surgical stage I uterine papillary serous carcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 105, 677.

[19] http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/uterine.pdf

[20] Pereira E.B., De B., Kolev V., Zakashansky K., Green S., Dottino P., et al.: “Survey of Current Practice Patterns in the Treatment of EarlyStage Endometrial Cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2016, 26, 341.

[21] Creasman W.T., Odicino F., Maisonneuve P., Beller U., Benedet J.L., Heintz A.P., et al.: “Carcinoma of the corpus uteri”. J. Epidemiol. Biostat., 2001, 6, 47.

[22] Irwin C., Levin W., Fyles A., Pintilie M., Manchul L., Kirkbride P.: “The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in carcinoma of the endometriumresults in 550 patients with pathologic stage I disease”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1998, 70, 247.

[23] Creutzberg C.L., van Putten W.L., Warlam-Rodenhuis C.C., van den Bergh A.C., de Winter K.A., Koper P.C., et al.: “Outcome of highrisk stage IC, grade 3, compared with stage I endometrial carcinoma patients: the Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma Trial”. J Clin Oncol., 2004, 22, 1234.

[24] Morrow C.P., Bundy B.N., Kurman R.J., Creasman W.T., Heller P., Homesley H.D., et al.: “Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1991, 40, 55.

[25] Boruta D.M. 2nd, Gehrig P.A., Groben P.A., Bae-Jump V., Boggess J.F., Fowler W.C. Jr., et al.: “Uterine serous and grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas: is there a survival difference?” Cancer, 2004, 101, 2214.

[26] Alektiar K.M., McKee A., Lin O., Venkatraman E., Zelefsky M.J., McKee B., et al.: “Is there a difference in outcome between stage III endometrial cancer of papillary serous/clear cell and endometrioid FIGO Grade 3 cancer?” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2002, 54, 79.

[27] Cirisano F.D. Jr., Robboy S.J., Dodge R.K., Bentley R.C., Krigman H.R., Synan I.S., et al.: “The outcome of stage I-II clinically and surgically staged papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared with endometrioid carcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 77, 55.

[28] Greenfield S., Blanco D.M., Elashoff R.M., Ganz P.A.: “Patterns of care related to age of breast cancer patients”. JAMA, 1987, 257, 2766.

[29] Samet J., Hunt W.C., Key C., Humble C.G., Goodwin J.S.: “Choice of cancer therapy varies with age of patient”. JAMA, 1986, 255, 3385.

[30] Giovanazzi-Bannon S., Rademaker A., Lai G., Benson A.B. 3rd: “Treatment tolerance of elderly cancer patients entered onto phase II clinical trials: an Illinois Cancer Center study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 1994, 12, 2447.

[31] Silliman R.A., Balducci L., Goodwin J.S., Holmes F.F., Leventhal E.A.: “Breast cancer care in old age: what we know, don’t know, and do”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 1993, 85, 190.

[32] Gridelli C., Maione P., Rossi A., Ferrara M.L., Castaldo V., Palazzolo G., et al.: “Treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the elderly”. Lung Cancer, 2009, 66, 282.

[33] Lang K., Marciniak M.D., Faries D., Stokes M., Buesching D., Earle C., et al.: “Trends and predictors of first-line chemotherapy use among elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the United States”. Lung Cancer, 2009, 63, 264.

[34] Ramsey S.D., Howlader N., Etzioni R.D., Donato B.: “Chemotherapy use, outcomes, and costs for older persons with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer: evidence from surveillance, epidemiology and end results-Medicare”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2004, 22, 4971.

[35] Randall M.E., Filiaci V.L., Muss H., Spirtos N.M., Mannel R.S., Fowler J., et al.: “Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2006, 24, 36.

[36] Le T., Adolph A., Krepart G.V., Lotocki R., Heywood M.S.: “The benefits of comprehensive surgical staging in the management of early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2002, 85, 351.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top