Article Data

  • Views 622
  • Dowloads 121

Editorials

Open Access

Clinicopathological characteristics and outcome of high grade breast cancer: our 9 years’ experience

  • C. Cedolini1,†
  • S. Bertozzi1,†,*,
  • A. P. Londero2
  • M. Yanova1
  • L. Seriau1
  • S. Bernardi3,4
  • A. Risaliti1

1Clinic of Surgery, DSMB, DISM, University of Udine, Udine, Italy

2,Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology

3 S. Polo Hospital, Monfalcone, Italy

4Department of General Surgery, AOU "SSMM della Misericordia", Udine, Italy

5Unit of Surgery, Latisana Hospital, Latisana, Italy

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4105.2017 Vol.38,Issue 5,October 2017 pp.708-714

Published: 10 October 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): S. Bertozzi E-mail: dr.bertozzi@gmail.com

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim was to determine the characteristics of G3 breast cancers as well as to evaluate the treatment patients received and their outcome in terms of overall- and disease-free survival. Materials and Methods: 2,407 women affected by invasive breast cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups according to the grading, to compare G3 cancers with G1 and G2 ones. Tumor, population characteristics, management, and outcomes were considered in the analysis. Results: The authors found that G3 breast cancers were associated with tumor characteristics indicative of more aggressive behavior and with reduced overall and disease-free survival. Although they were more frequently treated with demolitive surgery and chemotherapy, prognosis of G3 tumors at Stages I and II did not change in case of radical or conservative surgical treatment, while Stage III G3 tumors had a significant prognostic advantage by conservative surgery. Conclusions: G3 breast cancers should be considered with particular attention for their aggressiveness when planning the therapeutic procedure. However, breast demolitive surgery should be carefully scheduled and reserved to women who can not benefit from complementary therapies to conservative surgery.

Keywords

reast neoplasms; Neoplasm grading; High grade breast cancer; Breast conservative surgery.

Cite and Share

C. Cedolini,S. Bertozzi,A. P. Londero,M. Yanova,L. Seriau,S. Bernardi,A. Risaliti. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcome of high grade breast cancer: our 9 years’ experience. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2017. 38(5);708-714.

References

[1] Bertozzi S., Londero A.P., Cedolini C., Uzzau A., Seriau L., Bernardi S., et al.: “Prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis of peritoneal metastasis from breast cancer”. Springerplus, 2015, 4, 688.

[2] Bertozzi S., Londero A.P., Giacomuzzi F., Angione V., Carbone A., Petri R., et al.: “Applicability of two different validated models to predict axillary non-sentinel lymph node status by sentinel node biopsy in a single Italian center”. Breast Cancer, 2015, 22, 350.

[3] Cedolini C., Bertozzi S., Londero A.P., Bernardi S., Seriau L., Concina S., et al.: “Type of breast cancer diagnosis, screening, and survival”. Clin. Breast Cancer, 2014, 14, 235.

[4] Bernardi S., Bertozzi S., Londero A.P., Giacomuzzi F., Angione V., Dri C., et al.: “Nine years of experience with the sentinel lymph node biopsy in a single Italian center: a retrospective analysis of 1,050 cases”. World J. Surg., 2012, 36, 714.

[5] Fitzgibbons P.L., Page D.L., Weaver D., Thor A.D., Allred D.C., Clark G.M., et al.: ‘Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999”. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 2000, 124, 966.

[6] Elston C.W., Ellis I.O.: “Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up”. Histopathology, 1991, 19, 403.

[7] Gilchrist K.W., Kalish L., Gould V.E., Hirschl S., Imbriglia J.E., Levy W.M., et al.: “Interobserver reproducibility of histopathological features in stage II breast cancer. An ECOG study”. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 1985, 5, 3.

[8] Schumacher M., Schmoor C., Sauerbrei W., Schauer A., Ummenhofer L., Gatzemeier W., et al.: “The prognostic effect of histological tumor grade in node-negative breast cancer patients”. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 1993, 25, 235.

[9] Dawson A.E., Austin R. Jr., Weinberg D.S.: “Nuclear grading of breast carcinoma by image analysis. Classification by multivariate and neural network analysis:”. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 1991, 95, S29.

[10] Henson D.E., Ries L., Freedman L.S., Carriaga M.: “Relationship among outcome, stage of disease, and histologic grade for 22,616 cases of breast cancer. The basis for a prognostic index”. Cancer, 1991, 68, 2142.

[11] Le Doussal V., Tubiana-Hulin M., Friedman S., Hacene K., Spyratos F., Brunet M.: “Prognostic value of histologic grade nuclear components of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR). An improved score modification based on a multivariate analysis of 1262 invasive ductal breast carcinomas”. Cancer, 1989, 64, 1914.

[12] Contesso G., Mouriesse H., Friedman S., Genin J., Sarrazin D., Rouesse J.: “The importance of histologic grade in long-term prognosis of breast cancer: a study of 1,010 patients, uniformly treated at the Institut Gustave-Roussy”. J. Clin. Oncol., 1987, 5, 1378.

[13] Rank F., Dombernowsky P., Jespersen N.C., Pedersen B.V., Keiding N.: “Histologic malignancy grading of invasive ductal breast carcinoma. A regression analysis of prognostic factors in low-risk carcinomas from a multicenter trial”. Cancer, 1987, 60, 1299.

[14] Davis B.W., Gelber R.D., Goldhirsch A., Hartmann W.H., Locher G.W., Reed R., et al.: “Prognostic significance of tumor grade in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis”. Cancer, 1986, 58, 2662.

[15] Fisher E.R., Redmond C., Fisher B.: “Histologic grading of breast cancer”. Pathol. Annu., 1980, 15, 239.

[16] Arnone P., Zurrida S., Viale G., Dellapasqua S., Montagna E., Arnaboldi P., et al.: “The TNM classification of breast cancer: need for change”. Updates Surg., 2010, 62, 75.

[17] Cedolini C., Bertozzi S., Seriau L., Londero A.P., Concina S., Cattin F., et al.: “Eight-year experience with the intraoperative frozen section examination of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer in a North-Italian university center”. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol., 2014, 7, 364.

[18] Cedolini C., Bertozzi S., Seriau L., Londero A.P., Concina S., Moretti E., et al.: “Feasibility of concervative breast surgery and intraoperative radiation therapy for early breast cancer: A single-center, open, non-randomized, prospective pilot study”. Oncol. Rep., 2014, 31, 1539.

[19] Bernardi S., Bertozzi S., Londero A.P., Gentile G., Giacomuzzi F., Carbone A.: “Incidence and risk factors of the intraoperative localization failure of nonpalpable breast lesions by radio-guided occult lesion localization: a retrospective analysis of 579 cases”. World J. Surg., 2012, 36, 1915.

[20] Cortazar P., Zhang L., Untch M., Mehta K., Costantino J.P., Wolmark N., et al.: “Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis”. Lancet, 2014, 384, 164.

[21] Haffty B.G., McCall L.M., Ballman K.V., McLaughlin S., Jagsi R., Ollila D.W., et al.: “Patterns of Local-Regional Management Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Results From ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance). Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2016, 94, 493.

[22] Fisher B., Bryant J., Wolmark N., Mamounas E., Brown A., Fisher E.R., et al.: “Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 1998, 16, 2672.

[23] Woodward W.A., Strom E.A., Tucker S.L., Katz A., McNeese M.D., Perkins G.H., et al.: “Locoregional recurrence after doxorubicinbased chemotherapy and postmastectomy: Implications for breast cancer patients with early-stage disease and predictors for recurrence after postmastectomy radiation”. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2003, 57, 336.

[24] Cortazar P., Geyer C.E. Jr.: “Pathological complete response in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2015, 22, 1441.

[25] Anderson S.J., Wapnir I., Dignam J.J., Fisher B., Mamounas E.P., Jeong J.H., et al.: “Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in patients treated by breast-conserving therapy in five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocols of node-negative breast cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2009, 27, 2466.

[26] Waeber M., Castiglione-Gertsch M., Dietrich D., Thürlimann B., Goldhirsch A., Brunner K.W., et al.: “Adjuvant therapy after excision and radiation of isolated postmastectomy locoregional breast cancer recurrence: definitive results of a phase III randomized trial (SAKK 23/82) comparing tamoxifen with observation”. Ann. Oncol., 2003, 14, 1215.

[27] Salvadori B., Marubini E., Miceli R., Conti A.R., Cusumano F., Andreola S., et al.: “Reoperation for locally recurrent breast cancer in patients previously treated with conservative surgery”. Br. J. Surg., 1999, 86, 84.

[28] Osborne M.P., Borgen P.I., Wong G.Y., Rosen P.P., McCormick B.: “Salvage mastectomy for local and regional recurrence after breastconserving operation and radiation therapy”. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet., 1992, 174, 189.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top