Article Data

  • Views 523
  • Dowloads 149

Original Research

Open Access

The differential diagnosis of ultrasonic imaging by automated breast volume scanning in breast cancer

  • Weixiang Liang1,†,*
  • Jiangxiu Yu2,†
  • Yinong Xie1
  • Lan Jiang1
  • Xingxing Zhou1
  • Suhuan Feng1

1Department of Ultrasound Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China

2Department of Ultrasound Medicine, The Affiliated Baoan Hospital of Nanfang Medical University, Shenzhen, China

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4131.2018 Vol.39,Issue 4,August 2018 pp.548-553

Published: 10 August 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): Weixiang Liang E-mail: wxl2016vip@163.com

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of coronal ultrasonic characteristics by automated breast volume- scanning (ABVS) in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions, and further compare the differential diagnostic values of handheld ultrasound (HHUS), ABVS, HUUS combined with ABVS, and molybdenum target X-ray (MTXR) in benign and malignant lesions. Materials and Methods: This study was retrospectively performed in 84 patients with 87 breast lesions. All breast lesions were diagnosed by ABVS, HHUS, and MTXR, then confirmed using histopathologic examination. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated, as well as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with the area under the curve (AUC) was analyzed to predict the diagnostic values of coronal ultrasonic characteristics by ABVS as well as HHUS, ABVS, HHUS combined with ABVS, and MTXR in breast benign and malignant lesions. Results: Convergence sign and lotus root sign of malignant lesions and the weeping willow sign of benign lesions could be observed in ABVS coronal image. Mass margin and surrounding halo also had high sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV. In addition, HHUS combined with ABVS, HHUS, ABVS, and MTXR had similar sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, NPV, and AUC in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. Conclusions: ABVS coronal image have high application value in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. In addition, HHUS combined with ABVS, HHUS, ABVS or MTXR have similar diagnostic efficiencies in differentiating benign and malignant lesions.

Keywords

Automated breast volume scanning; Handheld ultrasound; Molybdenum target X-ray; Diagnostic efficiency; Breast lesions.

Cite and Share

Weixiang Liang,Jiangxiu Yu,Yinong Xie,Lan Jiang,Xingxing Zhou,Suhuan Feng. The differential diagnosis of ultrasonic imaging by automated breast volume scanning in breast cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(4);548-553.

References

[1] Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A.: “Cancer statistics, 2015". CA Cancer J. Clin., 2015, 65, 5.

[2] Fan L., Strasser-Weippl K., Li J.J., St Louis J., Finkelstein D.M., Yu K.D., et al.: "Breast cancer in China”. Lancet Oncol., 2014, 15, e279.

[3] Kim Y., Jun J.K., Choi K.S., Lee H.-Y., Park E.C.: “Overview of the National Cancer screening programme and the cancer screening status in Korea”. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2011, 12, 725.

[4] Bleyer A., Welch H.G.: “Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2012, 367, 1998.

[5] Wang J., Shih T.T.F., Hsu J.C.Y., Li Y.W.: “The evaluation of false negative mammography from malignant and benign breast lesions”. Clin. Imaging, 2000, 24, 96.

[6] Boyd N.F., Guo H., Martin L.J., Sun L., Stone J., Fishell E., et al.: “Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2007, 356, 227.

[7] Lee C.H., Dershaw D.D., Kopans D., Evans P., Monsees B., Monticciolo D., et al.: “Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer”. J. Am. Coll. Radiol., 2010, 7, 18.

[8] Perry N., Broeders M., De Wolf C., Törnberg S., Holland R., Von Karsa L.: “European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. —summary document”. Ann. Oncol., 2008, 19, 614.

[9] Bae M.S., Moon W.K., Chang J.M., Koo H.R., Kim W.H., Cho N., et al.: “Breast cancer detected with screening US: reasons for nondetection at mammography”. Radiology, 2014, 270, 369.

[10] Corsetti V., Ferrari A., Ghirardi M., Bergonzini R., Bellarosa S., Angelini O., et al.: “Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts”. Radiol. Med., 2006, 111, 440.

[11] Lin X., Wang J., Han F., Fu J., Li A.: “Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound”. Eur. J. Radiol., 2012, 81, 873.

[12] Chou Y.-H., Tiu C.-M., Chen J., Chang R.-F.: “Automated full-field breast ultrasonography: the past and the present”. J. Med. Ultrasound, 2007, 15, 31.

[13] Tozaki M., Isobe S., Yamaguchi M., Ogawa Y., Kohara M., Joo C., et al.: “Optimal scanning technique to cover the whole breast using an automated breast volume scanner”. Jpn. J. Radiol., 2010, 28, 325.

[14] Chang J.M., Moon W.K., Cho N., Park J.S., Kim S.J.: “Radiologists’ performance in the detection of benign and malignant masses with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS)”. Eur. J. Radiol., 2011, 78, 99.

[15] Wang Z.L., Xw J.H., Li J.L., Huang Y., Tang J.: “Comparison of automated breast volume scanning to hand-held ultrasound and mammography”. Radiol. Med., 2012, 117, 1287.

[16] Choi W.J., Cha J.H., Kim H.H., Shin H.J., Kim H., Chae E.Y., et al.: “Comparison of automated breast volume scanning and hand-held ultrasound in the detection of breast cancer: an analysis of 5,566 patient evaluations”. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2013, 15, 9101.

[17] Adler D.D., Carson P.L., Rubin J.M., Quinn-Reid D.: “Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings”. Ultrasound Med. Biol., 1990, 16, 553.

[18] D’orsi C., Bassett L., Berg W., Feig S., Jackson V., Kopans D.: “Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADSmammography”. American College of Radiology (ACR), Reston, 2003.

[19] DeSantis C., Siegel R., Bandi P., Jemal A.: “Breast cancer statistics, 2011”. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2011, 61, 408.

[20] Zhang J., Lai X.J., Zhu Q.L., Wang H.Y., Jiang Y.X., Liu H., et al.: “Interobserver agreement for sonograms of breast lesions obtained by an automated breast volume scanner”. Eur. J. Radiol., 2012, 81, 2179.

[21] Wang H.Y., Jiang Y.X., Zhu Q.L., Zhang J., Dai Q., Liu H., et al.: “Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations”. Eur. J. Radiol., 2012, 81, 3190.

[22] Krizmanich-Conniff K., Paramagul C., Patterson S.K., Helvie M.A., Roubidoux M.A., Myles J.D., et al.: “Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Imaging and Clinical Characteristics”. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol., 2012, 199, 458.

[23] Kamitani K., Ono M., Toyoshima S., Mitsuyama S., Anan K., Ikeda Y.: “Isoechoic axillary lymph node metastases of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: a case report”. Breast Cancer, 2006, 13, 382.

[24] Kamitani K., Kamitani T., Ono M., Toyoshima S., Mitsuyama S.: “Ultrasonographic findings of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: correlation between internal echogenicity and histological findings”. Breast Cancer, 2012, 19, 349.

[25] Warm M., Duda V., Eichler C., Harbeck N., Gossmann A., Thomas A., et al.: “3D breast ultrasound: a significant predictor in breast cancer reduction under pre-operative chemotherapy”. Anticancer Res., 2011, 31, 4039.

[26] Rotten D., Levaillant J., Zerat L.: “Analysis of normal breast tissue and of solid breast masses using three-dimensional ultrasound mammography”. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol., 1999, 14, 114.

[27] Stavros A.T., Thickman D., Rapp C.L., Dennis M.A., Parker S.H., Sisney G.A.: “Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions”. Radiology, 1995, 196, 123.

[28] Kotsianos-Hermle D., Hiltawsky K., Wirth S., Fischer T., Friese K., Reiser M.: “Analysis of 107 breast lesions with automated 3D ultrasound and comparison with mammography and manual ultrasound”. Eur. J. Radiol., 2009, 71, 109.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top