Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Surgical management of recurrent gynecological cancer: Complete resection is the key to longer survival
1Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima City, Fukushima, Japan
2Departments of Fukushima Medical Center for Children and Women, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima City, Fukushima, Japan
3Departments of Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima City, Fukushima, Japan
4Department of Gynecology, Miyagi Cancer Center, Medeshima-Shiode, Natori, Miyagi, Japan
5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shirakawa Kosei General Hospital, Toyochi, Shirakawa City, Fukushima, Japan
6Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Takeda General Hospital, Aizu, Wakamatsu City, Fukushima, Japan
7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwaki Kyoritsu General Hospital, Uchigo, Mimaya-machi, Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan
DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4181.2019 Vol.40,Issue 1,February 2019 pp.28-35
Accepted: 23 March 2017
Published: 10 February 2019
*Corresponding Author(s): S. Soeda E-mail: s-soeda@fmu.ac.jp
Purpose of investigation: This study was conducted to elucidate the efficacy and feasibility of surgical management of recurrent gynecological (cervical, endometrial, and ovarian) cancers. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing surgical management for recurrent gynecological cancers at Fukushima Medical University between January 2001 and December 2012 were evaluated. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were each estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Results: Fifty patients underwent surgery for recurrent gynecological cancers (13 cervical, 18 endometrial, and 19 ovarian). On univariate analysis, complete surgery was a significant prognostic factor in all cancer types. On multivariate analysis, there were significant differences in complete surgery and the number of recurrent tumors for endometrial cancer. Conclusion: These results suggest that, in a select group of patients, especially in recurrent endometrial cancer, surgical management improves survival of recurrent gynecologic cancer patients, and it is valuable therapeutic option.
Recurrent gynecological cancer; Surgical management; Complete surgery
S. Soeda,T. Watanabe,S. Nomura,M. Kojima,S. Furukawa,H. Endo,Z. Saze,T. Ozeki,H. Nishiyama,A. Kenjo,T. Takahashi,H. Yamada,K. Fujimori. Surgical management of recurrent gynecological cancer: Complete resection is the key to longer survival. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(1);28-35.
[1] National Comprehensive Cancer Network: “NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology cervical cancer V1”, 2016.
[2] Ebina Y., Yaegashi N., Katabuchi H., Nagase S., Udagawa Y., Hachisuga T., et al.: “Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines 2011 for the treatment of uterine cervical cancer”. Int. J. Clin. Oncol., 2015, 20, 240.
[3] Colombo N., Carinelli S., Colombo A., Marini C., Rollo D., Sessa C., et al.: “Cervical cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up”. Ann Oncol., 2012, 23, 27.
[4] Nagase S., Inoue Y., Umesaki N., Aoki D., Ueda M., Sakamoto H., et al.: “Evidence-based guidelines for treatment of cervical cancer in Japan. Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) 2007 edition”. Int. J. Clin. Oncol., 2010, 15, 117.
[5] Meyer L.A., Bohlke K., Powell M.A., Fader A.N., Franklin G.E., Lee L.J., et al.: “Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Endometrial Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of the American Society for Radiation Oncology Evidence-Based Guideline”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2015, 33, 2908.
[6] Colombo N., Preti E., Landoni F., Carinelli S., Colombo A., Marini C., et al.: “Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up”. Ann Oncol., 2013, 24, 33.
[7] Elshaikh M.A., Vance S., Gaffney DK., Biagioli M., Jhingran A., Jolly S., et al.: “ACR Appropriateness Criteria Management of Recurrent Endometrial Cancer”. Am. J. Clin. Oncol., 2016, 39, 507.
[8] Komiyama S., Katabuchi H., Mikami M., Nagase S., Okamoto A., Ito K., et al.: “Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines 2015 for the treatment of ovarian cancer including primary peritoneal cancer and fallopian tube cancer”. Int. J. Clin. Oncol., 2016, 21, 435.
[9] Dottino J.A., Cliby W.A., Myers E.R., Bristow R.E., Havrilesky L.J.: “Improving NCCN guideline-adherent care for ovarian cancer: Value of an intervention”. Gynecol Oncol., 2015, 138, 694.
[10] Bristow R.E., Chang J., Ziogas A., Campos B., Chavez L.R., AntonCulver H.: “Impact of National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Centers on ovarian cancer treatment and survival”. J. Am. Coll. Surg., 2015, 220, 940.
[11] Jurado M., Alcázar JL., Martinez-Monge R.: “Resectability rates of previously irradiated recurrent cervical cancer (PIRCC) treated with pelvic exenteration: is still the clinical involvement of the pelvis wall a real contraindication? a twenty-year experience”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, 116(1), 38-43.
[12] Tanaka S., Nagase S., Kaiho-Sakuma M., Nagai T., Kurosawa H., Toyoshima M., et al.: “Clinical outcome of pelvic exenteration in patients with advanced or recurrent uterine cervical cancer”. Int. J. Clin Oncol., 2014, 19, 133.
[13] Sardain H., Lavoue V., Redpath M., Bertheuil N., Foucher F., Lev- êque J.: “Curative pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical carcinoma in the era of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. A systematic review”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2015, 41, 975.
[14] Battista M.J., Schmidt M., Eichbaum M., Almstedt K., Heimes AS., Mallmann P., et al.: “Management of recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer in Germany: results of the nationwide AGO pat- tern of care studies from the years 2013, 2009 and 2006”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2015, 292, 1355.
[15] Ren Y., Shan B., Shi D., Wang H.: “Salvage cytoreductive surgery for patients with recurrent endometrial cancer: a retrospective study”. BMC Cancer, 2014, 26, 135.
[16] Papadia A., Bellati F., Ditto A., Bogani G., Gasparri M.L., Di Donato V., et al.: “Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: Time for a Paradigm Shift”. Ann Surg Oncol., 2015, 22, 4204.
[17] Harter P., du Bois A., Hahmann M., Hasenburg A., Burges A., Loibl S., et al.: “Surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer: the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) DESKTOP OVAR trial”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2006, 13, 1702.
[18] Tian W.J., Chi D.S., Sehouli J., Tropé C.G., Jiang R., Ayhan A., et al.: “A risk model for secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer: an evidence-based proposal for patient selection”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2012, 19, 597.
[19] Popovich M.J., Hricak H., Sugimura K., Stern J.L.: “The role of MR imaging in determining surgical eligibility for pelvic exenteration”. Am. J. Roentgenol.,1993, 160, 525.
[20] Seki M., Nakagawa K., Tsuchiya S., Matsubara T., Kinoshita I., Weng S.Y., et al.: “Surgical treatment of pulmonary metastases from uterine cervical cancer. Operation method by lung tumor size”. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 1992, 104, 876.
[21] Susumu N., Sagae S., Udagawa Y., Niwa K., Kuramoto H., Satoh S., et al.: “Randomised phase III trial of pelvic radiotherapy versus cisplatin-based combined chemotherapy in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol Oncol., 2008, 108, 226-233.
[22] Randall M.E., Filiaci V.L.., Muss H., Spirtos N.M., Mannel R.S., Fowler J., et al.: “Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2006, 24, 36.
Top