Article Data

  • Views 533
  • Dowloads 142

Original Research

Open Access

Surgical management of recurrent gynecological cancer: Complete resection is the key to longer survival

  • S. Soeda1,*,
  • T. Watanabe1
  • S. Nomura1
  • M. Kojima1
  • S. Furukawa5
  • H. Endo3
  • Z. Saze3
  • T. Ozeki6
  • H. Nishiyama7
  • A. Kenjo3
  • T. Takahashi2
  • H. Yamada4
  • K. Fujimori1

1Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima City, Fukushima, Japan

2Departments of Fukushima Medical Center for Children and Women, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima City, Fukushima, Japan

3Departments of Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima City, Fukushima, Japan

4Department of Gynecology, Miyagi Cancer Center, Medeshima-Shiode, Natori, Miyagi, Japan

5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shirakawa Kosei General Hospital, Toyochi, Shirakawa City, Fukushima, Japan

6Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Takeda General Hospital, Aizu, Wakamatsu City, Fukushima, Japan

7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwaki Kyoritsu General Hospital, Uchigo, Mimaya-machi, Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4181.2019 Vol.40,Issue 1,February 2019 pp.28-35

Accepted: 23 March 2017

Published: 10 February 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): S. Soeda E-mail: s-soeda@fmu.ac.jp

Abstract

Purpose of investigation: This study was conducted to elucidate the efficacy and feasibility of surgical management of recurrent gynecological (cervical, endometrial, and ovarian) cancers. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing surgical management for recurrent gynecological cancers at Fukushima Medical University between January 2001 and December 2012 were evaluated. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were each estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Results: Fifty patients underwent surgery for recurrent gynecological cancers (13 cervical, 18 endometrial, and 19 ovarian). On univariate analysis, complete surgery was a significant prognostic factor in all cancer types. On multivariate analysis, there were significant differences in complete surgery and the number of recurrent tumors for endometrial cancer. Conclusion: These results suggest that, in a select group of patients, especially in recurrent endometrial cancer, surgical management improves survival of recurrent gynecologic cancer patients, and it is valuable therapeutic option.

Keywords

Recurrent gynecological cancer; Surgical management; Complete surgery

Cite and Share

S. Soeda,T. Watanabe,S. Nomura,M. Kojima,S. Furukawa,H. Endo,Z. Saze,T. Ozeki,H. Nishiyama,A. Kenjo,T. Takahashi,H. Yamada,K. Fujimori. Surgical management of recurrent gynecological cancer: Complete resection is the key to longer survival. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(1);28-35.

References

[1] National Comprehensive Cancer Network: “NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology cervical cancer V1”, 2016.

[2] Ebina Y., Yaegashi N., Katabuchi H., Nagase S., Udagawa Y., Hachisuga T., et al.: “Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines 2011 for the treatment of uterine cervical cancer”. Int. J. Clin. Oncol., 2015, 20, 240.

[3] Colombo N., Carinelli S., Colombo A., Marini C., Rollo D., Sessa C., et al.: “Cervical cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up”. Ann Oncol., 2012, 23, 27.

[4] Nagase S., Inoue Y., Umesaki N., Aoki D., Ueda M., Sakamoto H., et al.: “Evidence-based guidelines for treatment of cervical cancer in Japan. Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) 2007 edition”. Int. J. Clin. Oncol., 2010, 15, 117.

[5] Meyer L.A., Bohlke K., Powell M.A., Fader A.N., Franklin G.E., Lee L.J., et al.: “Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Endometrial Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of the American Society for Radiation Oncology Evidence-Based Guideline”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2015, 33, 2908.

[6] Colombo N., Preti E., Landoni F., Carinelli S., Colombo A., Marini C., et al.: “Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up”. Ann Oncol., 2013, 24, 33.

[7] Elshaikh M.A., Vance S., Gaffney DK., Biagioli M., Jhingran A., Jolly S., et al.: “ACR Appropriateness Criteria Management of Recurrent Endometrial Cancer”. Am. J. Clin. Oncol., 2016, 39, 507.

[8] Komiyama S., Katabuchi H., Mikami M., Nagase S., Okamoto A., Ito K., et al.: “Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines 2015 for the treatment of ovarian cancer including primary peritoneal cancer and fallopian tube cancer”. Int. J. Clin. Oncol., 2016, 21, 435.

[9] Dottino J.A., Cliby W.A., Myers E.R., Bristow R.E., Havrilesky L.J.: “Improving NCCN guideline-adherent care for ovarian cancer: Value of an intervention”. Gynecol Oncol., 2015, 138, 694.

[10] Bristow R.E., Chang J., Ziogas A., Campos B., Chavez L.R., AntonCulver H.: “Impact of National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Centers on ovarian cancer treatment and survival”. J. Am. Coll. Surg., 2015, 220, 940.

[11] Jurado M., Alcázar JL., Martinez-Monge R.: “Resectability rates of previously irradiated recurrent cervical cancer (PIRCC) treated with pelvic exenteration: is still the clinical involvement of the pelvis wall a real contraindication? a twenty-year experience”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, 116(1), 38-43.

[12] Tanaka S., Nagase S., Kaiho-Sakuma M., Nagai T., Kurosawa H., Toyoshima M., et al.: “Clinical outcome of pelvic exenteration in patients with advanced or recurrent uterine cervical cancer”. Int. J. Clin Oncol., 2014, 19, 133.

[13] Sardain H., Lavoue V., Redpath M., Bertheuil N., Foucher F., Lev- êque J.: “Curative pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical carcinoma in the era of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. A systematic review”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2015, 41, 975.

[14] Battista M.J., Schmidt M., Eichbaum M., Almstedt K., Heimes AS., Mallmann P., et al.: “Management of recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer in Germany: results of the nationwide AGO pat- tern of care studies from the years 2013, 2009 and 2006”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2015, 292, 1355.

[15] Ren Y., Shan B., Shi D., Wang H.: “Salvage cytoreductive surgery for patients with recurrent endometrial cancer: a retrospective study”. BMC Cancer, 2014, 26, 135.

[16] Papadia A., Bellati F., Ditto A., Bogani G., Gasparri M.L., Di Donato V., et al.: “Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: Time for a Paradigm Shift”. Ann Surg Oncol., 2015, 22, 4204.

[17] Harter P., du Bois A., Hahmann M., Hasenburg A., Burges A., Loibl S., et al.: “Surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer: the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) DESKTOP OVAR trial”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2006, 13, 1702.

[18] Tian W.J., Chi D.S., Sehouli J., Tropé C.G., Jiang R., Ayhan A., et al.: “A risk model for secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer: an evidence-based proposal for patient selection”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2012, 19, 597.

[19] Popovich M.J., Hricak H., Sugimura K., Stern J.L.: “The role of MR imaging in determining surgical eligibility for pelvic exenteration”. Am. J. Roentgenol.,1993, 160, 525.

[20] Seki M., Nakagawa K., Tsuchiya S., Matsubara T., Kinoshita I., Weng S.Y., et al.: “Surgical treatment of pulmonary metastases from uterine cervical cancer. Operation method by lung tumor size”. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 1992, 104, 876.

[21] Susumu N., Sagae S., Udagawa Y., Niwa K., Kuramoto H., Satoh S., et al.: “Randomised phase III trial of pelvic radiotherapy versus cisplatin-based combined chemotherapy in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol Oncol., 2008, 108, 226-233.

[22] Randall M.E., Filiaci V.L.., Muss H., Spirtos N.M., Mannel R.S., Fowler J., et al.: “Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2006, 24, 36.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top