Article Data

  • Views 539
  • Dowloads 151

Original Research

Open Access

Proteomic approach to identify biomarkers for invasive cervix cancer - a prospective pilot study

  • D. Mysona2
  • A. Pyrzak2
  • J. Allen2
  • M. Powell2
  • D. Kleven2
  • W. Zhi1
  • A. Sharma1
  • S. Bai1
  • Jin-Xiong She1
  • B. Rungruang2
  • S.Ghamande2,*,

1Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, GA (USA)

2Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA (USA)

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4357.2018 Vol.39,Issue 5,October 2018 pp.737-742

Published: 10 October 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): S.Ghamande E-mail: sghamande@augusta.edu

Abstract

Purpose of Investigation: Cervical cancer (CC) is the second most common cancer of women worldwide and a leading cause of mortality. Unfortunately, this disease has no current viable serum biomarkers capable of diagnosing CC or predicting prognosis. The present authors’ objective was to examine novel serum biomarkers capable of identifying patients with invasive CC and determine their utility in monitoring disease status. Materials and Methods: In this IRB approved prospective study, luminex bead array was used to measure 18 different serum protein concentrations in CC patients (n=23), women with precancerous lesions (CIN2-3) (n=20) and patients with normal cervical cytology (n=20). CC patients had blood samples drawn within 30 days of diagnosis and repeat samples post-completion of therapy. MMP7 expression was confirmed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and scored independently by two pathologists. Results: Multiple proteins had different levels in CC, controls, and CIN (p < 0.05). MMP7 was most promising for identifying invasive cancer (sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity 95%, p < 0.001). IHC confirmed MMP7 expression in invasive CC. MMP7 serum levels were an indicator for progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 3.82, CI: 1.10–13.29, p = 0.025) and overall survival (OS) (HR 7.96, CI: 0.91– 69.32, p = 0.03). Conclusion: MMP7 serum concentration was altered when comparing CC, controls, and CIN2-3, and shows potential as being a future biomarker for both identifying invasive CC and patient prognosis. Based on this study, MMP7 warrants further investigation as a biomarker of invasive CC.

Keywords

Cervical cancer; Serum proteomics; Biomarkers.

Cite and Share

D. Mysona,A. Pyrzak,J. Allen,M. Powell,D. Kleven,W. Zhi,A. Sharma,S. Bai,Jin-Xiong She,B. Rungruang,S.Ghamande. Proteomic approach to identify biomarkers for invasive cervix cancer - a prospective pilot study. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(5);737-742.

References

[1] Ibeanu O.A.: “Molecular pathogenesis of cervical cancer”. Cancer Biol. Ther., 2011, 11, 295.

[2] Franco L.E., Schlecht F.N., Saslow D.: “The epidemiology of cervical cancer”. Cancer J., 2003, 9, 348.

[3] Tewari K.S., Sill M.W., Long H.J. 3rd., Penson R.T., Huang H., Ramondetta L.M., et al.: “Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer”. New Engl. J. Med., 2014, 370, 734.

[4] Partridge E.E., Abu-Rustum N.R., Campos S.M., Fahey P.J., Farmer M., Garcia R.L., et al.: “Cervical cancer screening”. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw., 2010, 8, 1358.

[5] Goldie S.J., Kuhn L., Denny L., Pollack A., Wright T.C.: “Policy analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies in low-resource settings: clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness”. JAMA, 2001, 285, 3107.

[6] Schiffman M., Castle P.E., Jeronimo J., Rodriguez A.C., Wacholder S.: “Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer”. Lancet, 2007, 370, 890.

[7] Giuliano A.R., Palefsky J.M., Goldstone S., Moreira E.D. Jr., Penny M.E., Aranda C., et al.: “Efficacy of quadrivalent HPV vaccine against HPV Infection and disease in males”. New Engl. J. Med., 2011, 364, 401.

[8] Waggoner S.E.: “Cervical cancer”. Lancet, 2003, 361, 2217.

[9] Gadducci A., Cosio S., Carpi A., Nicolini A., Genazzani A.R.: “Serum tumor markers in the management of ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer”. Biomed. Pharmacother., 2004, 58, 24.

[10] Gadducci A., Tana R., Cosio S., Genazzani A.R.: “The serum assay of tumour markers in the prognostic evaluation, treatment monitoring and follow-up of patients with cervical cancer: a review of the literature”. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol., 2008, 66, 10.

[11] Smith L., Lind M.J., Welham K.J., Cawkwell L., Cancer Biology Proteomics Group: “Cancer proteomics and its application to discovery of therapy response markers in human cancer. Cancer, 2006, 107, 232.

[12] Eisenhauer E.A., Therasse P., Bogaerts J., Schwartz L.H., Sargent D., Ford R., et al.: “New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2009, 45, 228.

[13] Huang Y.F., Shen M.R., Hsu K.F., Cheng Y.M., Chou C.Y.: “Clinical implications of insulin-like growth factor 1 system in early-stage cervical cancer”. Br. J. Cancer, 2008, 99, 1096.

[14] Mathur S.P., Mathur R.S., Gray E.A., Lane D., Underwood P.G., Kohler M., et al.: “Serum vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) as a specific biomarker for advanced cervical cancer: Relationship to insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II), IGF binding protein 3 (IGF-BP3) and VEGF-A [corrected]”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 98, 467.

[15] Sheu B.C., Lien H.C., Ho H.N., Lin H.H., Chow S.N., Huang S.C., et al.: “Increased expression and activation of gelatinolytic matrix metalloproteinases is associated with the progression and recurrence of human cervical cancer”. Cancer Res., 2003, 63, 6537.

[16] Herfs M., Yamamoto Y., Laury A., Wang X., Nucci M.R., McLaughlin-Drubin M.E., et al.: “A discrete population of squamocolumnar junction cells implicated in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, 2012, 109, 10516.

[17] Wu S.H., Zhang J., Li Y., Li J.M.: “Expression of ETV5 and MMP7 in early stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma and its role in lymphatic metastasis”. Ai Zheng, 2006, 25, 315.

[18] Klupp F., Neumann L., Kahlert C., Diers J., Halama N., Franz C., et al.: “Serum MMP7, MMP10 and MMP12 level as negative prognostic markers in colon cancer patients”. BMC Cancer, 2016, 16, 494.

[19] Wang S.C., Parekh J.R., Porembka M.R., Nathan H., D’Angelica M.I., DeMatteo R.P., et al.: “A Pilot Study Evaluating Serum MMP7 as a Preoperative Prognostic Marker for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients”. J. Gastrointest. Surg., 2016, 20, 899.

[20] Renema N., Navet B., Heymann M.F., Lezot F., Heymann D.: “RANK-RANKL signalling in cancer”. Biosci. Rep., 2016, 36, pii: e00366.

[21] Demoulin S.A., Somja J., Duray A., Guenin S., Roncarati P., Delvenne P.O., et al.: “Cervical (pre)neoplastic microenvironment promotes the emergence of tolerogenic dendritic cells via RANKL secretion”. Oncoimmunology, 2015, 4, e1008334.

[22] Shang W.Q., Li H., Liu L.B., Chang K.K., Yu J.J., Xie F., et al.: “RANKL/RANK interaction promotes the growth of cervical cancer cells by strengthening the dialogue between cervical cancer cells and regulation of IL-8 secretion”. Oncol. Rep., 2015, 34, 3007.

[23] Yoldi G., Pellegrini P., Trinidad E.M., Cordero A., Gomez-Miragaya J., Serra-Musach J., et al.: “RANK signaling blockade reduces breast cancer recurrence by inducing tumor cell differentiation”. Cancer Res., 2016, 76, 5857.

[24] Weber G.F., Lett G.S., Haubein N.C.: “Osteopontin is a marker for cancer aggressiveness and patient survival”. Br. J. Cancer, 2010, 103, 861.

[25] Maeda N., Ohashi T., Chagan-Yasutan H., Hattori T., Takahashi Y., Harigae H., et al.: “Osteopontin-integrin interaction as a novel molecular target for antibody-mediated immunotherapy in adult T-cell leukemia”. Retrovirology, 2015, 12, 99.

[26] Huang X., Qian Y., Wu H., Xie X., Zhou Q., Wang Y., et al.: “Aberrant expression of osteopontin and E-cadherin indicates radiation resistance and poor prognosis for patients with cervical carcinoma”. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 2015, 63, 88.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top