Article Data

  • Views 621
  • Dowloads 115

Original Research

Open Access

Comparison of surgical outcomes between laparoscopy and laparotomy for early-stage ovarian cancer

  • Se Hyun Nam1
  • Woo Young Kim1,*,

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4399.2019 Vol.40,Issue 2,April 2019 pp.262-267

Accepted: 26 September 2017

Published: 10 April 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): Woo Young Kim E-mail: obgykim@gmail.com

Abstract

To investigate the surgical and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy compared with laparotomy in early-stage ovarian cancer, the authors reviewed medical records of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer at Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Korea, between January 2001 and December 2014. Forty-nine patients were diagnosed with FIGO Stage I or II epithelial ovarian cancer and 25 and 24 patients underwent surgical staging by laparoscopy and laparotomy, respectively. Most of the clinicopathologic characteristics showed no statistical difference between the two groups. However, incidence of intraoperative tumor rupture was higher in the laparoscopy group (6/25 [24%] vs. 1/24 [4.2%]), although the primary tumor size was smaller (7.9 ± 4.2 vs. 15.0 ± 5.9, p = 0.05). There was no statistical difference between laparotomy and laparoscopy groups according to five-year overall survival (77.2% vs. 81.7%, p = 0.53) or five-year disease-free survival (76.5% vs. 81.3%, p = 0.77). Laparoscopic staging surgery showed similar surgical and oncologic outcomes to the laparotomy procedure in early-stage ovarian cancer.

Keywords

Laparoscopy; Laparotomy; Early-stage ovarian cancer; Survival

Cite and Share

Se Hyun Nam,Woo Young Kim. Comparison of surgical outcomes between laparoscopy and laparotomy for early-stage ovarian cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(2);262-267.

References

[1] Ghezzi F., Cromi A., Uccella S., Bergamini V., Tomera S., Franchi M., et al.: “Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the surgical management of apparent early stage ovarian cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 105, 409.

[2] Liu M., Li L., He Y., Peng D., Wang X., Chen W., et al.: “Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the surgical management of early-stage ovarian cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2014, 24, 352.

[3] Jemal A., Siegel R., Xu J., Ward E.: “Cancer statistics, 2010”. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2010, 60, 277.

[4] Koo Y.J., Kim J.E., Kim Y.H., Hahn H.S., Lee I.H., Kim T.J., et al.: “Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for the management of early-stage ovarian cancer: surgical and oncological outcomes”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 25, 111.

[5] Park J.Y., Kim D.Y., Suh D.S., Kim J.H., Kim Y.M., Kim Y.T., et al.: “Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in surgical staging of early-stage ovarian and fallopian tubal cancer”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2008, 15, 2012.

[6] Bogani G., Cromi A., Serati M., Di Naro E., Casarin J., Pinelli C., et al.: “Laparoscopic and open abdominal staging for early-stage ovarian cancer: our experience, systematic review, and meta-analysis of comparative studies”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2014, 24, 1241.

[7] Chi D.S., Abu-Rustum N.R., Sonoda Y., Ivy J., Rhee E., Moore K., et al.: “The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgical staging of apparent stage I ovarian and fallopian tube cancers”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2005, 192, 1614.

[8] Lee M., Kim S.W., Paek J., Lee S.H., Yim G.W., Kim J.H., et al.: “Comparisons of surgical outcomes, complications, and costs between laparotomy and laparoscopy in early-stage ovarian cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2011, 21, 251.

[9] Park J.Y., Bae J., Lim M.C., Lim S.Y., Seo S.S., Kang S., et al.: “Laparoscopic and laparotomic staging in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison of feasibility and safety”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2008, 18, 1202.

[10] Brockbank E.C., Harry V., Kolomainen D., Mukhopadhyay D., Sohaib A., Bridges J.E., et al.: “Laparoscopic staging for apparent early stage ovarian or fallopian tube cancer. First case series from a UK cancer centre and systematic literature review”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2013, 39, 912.

[11] Ghezzi F., Cromi A., Fanfani F., Malzoni M., Ditto A., De Iaco P., et al.: “Laparoscopic fertility-sparing surgery for early ovarian epithelial cancer: A multi-institutional experience”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2016, 141, 461.

[12] Nezhat F.R., Ezzati M., Chuang L., Shamshirsaz A.A., Rahaman J., Gretz H.: “Laparoscopic management of early ovarian and fallopian tube cancers: surgical and survival outcome”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2009, 200, 83.

[13] Tozzi R., Kohler C., Ferrara A., Schneider A.: “Laparoscopic treatment of early ovarian cancer: surgical and survival outcomes”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 93, 199.

[14] Leblanc E., Querleu D., Narducci F., Occelli B., Papageorgiou T., Sonoda Y.: “Laparoscopic restaging of early stage invasive adnexal tumors: a 10-year experience”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 94, 624.

[15] Schreuder H.W., Pattij T.O., Zweemer R.P., van Baal M.W., Verheijen R.H.: “Increasing experience in laparoscopic staging of early ovarian cancer”. Gynecol. Surg., 2012, 9, 89.

[16] Colomer A.T., Jimenez A.M., Bover Barcelo M.I.: “Laparoscopic treatment and staging of early ovarian cancer”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2008, 15, 414.

[17] Jung U.S., Lee J.H., Kyung M.S., Choi J.S.: “Feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic management of ovarian cancer”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2009, 35, 113.

[18] Damak T., Ben Hassouna J., Chargui R., Gamoudi A., Hechiche M., Dhieb T., et al.: “Borderline tumors of the ovary”. Tunis. Med., 2014, 92, 411.

[19] Park J.Y., Kim D.Y., Suh D.S., Kim J.H., Kim Y.M., Kim Y.T., et al.: “Outcomes of pediatric and adolescent girls with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2015, 137, 418.

[20] Grauso F., Messalli E.M., Salzillo M.E., Di Martino L., Falcone F., Orabona P., et al.: “Ovarian fibrosarcoma: case report and latest trends in diagnostic and therapeutic management”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2015, 36, 742.

[21] Bacalbasa N., Balescu I., Dima S., Popescu I.: “Ovarian sarcoma carries a poorer prognosis than ovarian epithelial cancer throughout all FIGO stages: a single-center case-control matched study”. Anti-cancer Res., 2014, 34, 7303.

[22] Lowe K.A., Chia V.M., Taylor A., O’Malley C., Kelsh M., Mohamed M., et al.: “An international assessment of ovarian cancer incidence and mortality”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 130, 107.

[23] Choi M., Fuller C.D., Thomas C.R., Jr., Wang S.J.: “Conditional survival in ovarian cancer: results from the SEER dataset 1988-2001”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 109, 203.

[24] Siegel R., Ward E., Brawley O., Jemal A.: “Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths”. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2011, 61, 212.

[25] Zhang Y., Fan S., Xiang Y., Duan H., Sun L.: “Comparison of the prognosis and recurrence of apparent early-stage ovarian tumors treated with laparoscopy and laparotomy: a meta-analysis of clinical studies”. BMC Cancer, 2015, 15, 597.

[26] Bogani G., Cromi A., Uccella S., Serati M., Casarin J., Mariani A., et al.: “Laparoscopic staging in women older than 75 years with early-stage endometrial cancer: comparison with open surgical operation”. Menopause, 2014, 21, 945.

[27] Fagotti A., Vizzielli G., De Iaco P., Surico D., Buda A., Mandato V.D., et al.: “A multicentric trial (Olympia-MITO 13) on the accuracy of laparoscopy to assess peritoneal spread in ovarian cancer”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2013, 209, 462.

[28] Benedet J.L., Bender H., Jones H., 3rd, Ngan H.Y., Pecorelli S.: “FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2000, 70, 209.

[29] Manolitsas T.P., Fowler J.M.: “Role of laparoscopy in the management of the adnexal mass and staging of gynecologic cancers“. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol., 2001, 44, 495.

[30] Yousef Y., Pucci V., Emil S.: “The Relationship between Intraoperative Rupture and Recurrence of Pediatric Ovarian Neoplasms: Preliminary Observations”. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol., 2016, 29, 111.

[31] Vergote I., De Brabanter J., Fyles A., Bertelsen K., Einhorn N., Sevelda P., et al.: “Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma”. Lancet, 2001, 357, 176.

[32] Tothill R.W., Tinker A.V., George J., Brown R., Fox S.B., Lade S., et al.: “Novel molecular subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome”. Clin. Cancer Res., 2008, 14, 5198.

[33] Kuntz C., Wunsch A., Bodeker C., Bay F., Rosch R., Windeler J., et al.: “Effect of pressure and gas type on intraabdominal, subcutaneous, and blood pH in laparoscopy”. Surg. Endosc., 2000, 14, 367.

[34] Schilling M.K., Redaelli C., Krahenbuhl L., Signer C., Buchler M.W.: “Splanchnic microcirculatory changes during CO2 laparoscopy”. J. Am. Coll. Surg., 1997, 184, 378.

[35] Wang P.H., Yuan C.C., Lin G., Ng H.T., Chao H.T.: “Risk factors contributing to early occurrence of port site metastases of laparoscopic surgery for malignancy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1999, 72, 38.

[36] Abu-Rustum N.R., Rhee E.H., Chi D.S., Sonoda Y., Gemignani M., Barakat R.R.: “Subcutaneous tumor implantation after laparoscopic procedures in women with malignant disease”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2004, 103, 480.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top