Article Data

  • Views 536
  • Dowloads 151

Original Research

Open Access

Fertility sparing in uterine sarcomas: single center experience of 13 patients

  • Mehmet Tunc1
  • Yusuf Aytac Tohma2,*,
  • Hanifi Sahin4
  • Huseyin Akilli2
  • Latife Atasoy Karakas2
  • Ozden Altundag3
  • Ali Haberal2
  • Ali Ayhan2

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Birecik State Hospital, Şanlıurfa, Turkey

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

3Department of Medical Oncology, Baskent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4502.2019 Vol.40,Issue 2,April 2019 pp.305-310

Accepted: 27 November 2017

Published: 10 April 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): Yusuf Aytac Tohma E-mail: aytactohma@hotmail.com

Abstract

Purpose of Investigation: The feasibility and safety of conservative surgery is not well defined for fertility sparing approach for uterine sarcoma due to very low incidence and poor prognosis. The authors present their experience regarding fertility preservation for uterine sarcoma. Materials and Methods: A total of 13 patients with uterine sarcoma were included in this retrospective case study; endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) (n=6) and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) (n=7). Patients data, including clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic information were extracted from medical records. Excision of mass and reconstruction of uterus was performed for fertility sparing in all patients and staging surgery (bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy ± omentectomy) as performed for five cases (one ESS case and four LMS cases). Results: The median size of the mass was 8.5 (range: 1-22) cm. Median follow-up time was 54 (range 13-142) months. Recurrence rate was 69.2% (9/13). The mean relapse interval was 30.69 months. Four patients died and all of them was diagnosed with LMS. Four pregnancies (37%) were recorded. Two of them occurred with assisted reproductive technologies (intracytoplasmic sperm injection), the other two pregnancies were spontaneous, and all of them had a cesarean delivery. Conclusion: Patients should be informed about prognosis of uterine sarcomas and risk of fertility preserving approach. Close follow-up is obligatory and complementary surgery should be performed after completion of fertility due to high recurrence rate and poor prognosis especially with LMS.

Keywords

Fertility preservation; Uterine sarcomas; Leiomyosarcoma; Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS)

Cite and Share

Mehmet Tunc,Yusuf Aytac Tohma,Hanifi Sahin,Huseyin Akilli,Latife Atasoy Karakas,Ozden Altundag,Ali Haberal,Ali Ayhan. Fertility sparing in uterine sarcomas: single center experience of 13 patients. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(2);305-310.

References

[1] Wu T.I., Yen T.C., Lai C.H.: “Clinical presentation and diagnosis of uterine sarcoma, including imaging”. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2011, 25, 681.

[2] D’Angelo E., Prat J.: “Uterine sarcomas: a review”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, 116, 131.

[3] Shah S.H., Jagannathan J.P., Krajewski K., O’Regan K.N., George S, Ramaiya N.H.: “Uterine sarcomas: then and now”. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol., 2012, 199, 213.

[4] Tse K.Y., Crawford R., Ngan H.Y.: “Staging of uterine sarcomas”. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2011, 25, 733.

[5] Trope C.G., Abeler V.M., Kristensen G.B.: “Diagnosis and treatment of sarcoma of the uterus. A review”. Acta Oncol., 2012, 51, 694.

[6] Prat J.: “FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2009, 104, 177.

[7] Bai H., Yang J., Cao D., Huang H., Xiang Y., Wu M., et al.: “Ovary and uterus-sparing procedures for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective study of 153 cases”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 132, 654.

[8] Choi M.C., Kim G., Hwang Y.Y.: “Fertility-sparing management combined with photodynamic therapy for endometrial stromal sarcoma: a case report”. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther., 2014, 11, 533.

[9] Madej J., Bocian J., Basta A.: “Possibilities of the organ-sparing surgical treatment of leiomyosarcoma in young women”. Ginekol. Pol., 1985, 56, 9.

[10] Lissoni A., Cormio G., Bonazzi C., Perego P., Lomonico S., Gabriele A., et al.: “Fertility-sparing surgery in uterine leiomyosarcoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1998, 70, 348.

[11] Ricci S., Stone R.L., Fader A.N.: “Uterine leiomyosarcoma: Epidemiology, contemporary treatment strategies and the impact of uterine morcellation”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, 145, 208.

[12] Zivanovic O., Leitao M.M., Iasonos A., Jacks L.M., Zhou Q., Abu- Rustum N.R., et al.: “Stage-specific outcomes of patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma: a comparison of the international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics and american joint committee on cancer staging systems”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2009, 27, 2066.

[13] Reed N.S.: “The management of uterine sarcomas”. Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.), 2008, 20, 470.

[14] Olah K.S., Gee H., Blunt S., Dunn J.A., Kelly K., Chan K.K.: “Retrospective analysis of 318 cases of uterine sarcoma”. Eur. J. Cancer, 1991, 27, 1095.

[15] Van Dinh T., Woodruff J.D.: “Leiomyosarcoma of the uterus”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1982, 144, 817.

[16] Davids A.M.: “Myomectomy; surgical technique and results in a series of 1,150 cases”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1952, 63, 592.

[17] He L., Li J.D., Xiong Y., Huang X., Huang L., Lin J.X., et al.: “Clinicopathological and molecular markers associated with prognosis and treatment effectiveness of endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective study in China”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2014, 289, 383.

[18] Litta P., Saccardi C., Conte L., Florio P.: “Reverse hysterectomy: another technique for performing a laparoscopic hysterectomy”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2013, 20, 631.

[19] Rauh-Hain J.A., del Carmen M.G.: “Endometrial stromal sarcoma: a systematic review”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2013, 122, 676.

[20] Chan J.K., Kawar N.M., Shin J.Y.., Osann K., Chen L.M., Powell C.B., et al.: “Endometrial stromal sarcoma: a population-based analysis”. Br. J. Cancer, 2008, 99, 1210.

[21] Yan L., Tian Y., Fu Y., Zhao X.: “Successful pregnancy after fertility-preserving surgery for endometrial stromal sarcoma”. Fertil. Steril., 2010, 93, 269 e1.

[22] Mansi J.L., Ramachandra S., Wiltshaw E., Fisher C.: “Endometrial stromal sarcomas”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1990, 36, 113.

[23] Lissoni A., Cormio G., Perego P., Gabriele A., Cantú M.G., Bratina G.: “Conservative management of endometrial stromalsarcoma in young women”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 1997, 7, 364.

[24] Stadsvold J.L., Molpus K.L., Baker J.J., Michael K., Remmenga S.W.: “Conservative management of a myxoid endometrial stromal sarcoma in a 16-year-old nulliparous woman”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 99, 243.

[25] Koskas M., Morice P., Yazbeck C., Duvillard P., Walker F., Madelenat P.: “Conservative management of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma followed by pregnancy and severe recurrence”. Anticancer Res., 2009, 29, 4147.

[26] Delaney A.A., Gubbels A.L., Remmenga S., Tomich P., Molpus K.: “Successful pregnancy after fertility-sparing local resection and uterine reconstruction for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2012, 120, 486.

[27] Sanchez-Ferrer M.L., Machado-Linde F., Ferri-Niguez B., Sanchez- Ferrer M., Parrilla-Paricio J.J.: “Reproductive outcome after uterine-sparing surgery for endometrial stromal sarcoma”. Gynecol. Oncol. Case Rep., 2012, 3, 4.

[28] Dong R., Mao H., Zhang P.: “Conservative management of endometrial stromal sarcoma at stage III: a case report”. Oncol. Lett., 2014, 8, 1234.

[29] Morimoto A., Tsubamoto H., Inoue K., Ikeda Y., Hirota S.: “Fatal case of multiple recurrences of endometrial stromal sarcoma after fertility-sparing management”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2015, 41, 162.

[30] Noventa M., Gizzo S., Conte L., Dalla Toffola A., Litta P., Saccardi C.: “Fertility sparing surgery in young women affected by endometrial stromal sarcoma: an oncologic dilemma or a reliable option? review of literature starting from a peculiar case”. Onco. Targets Ther., 2015, 8, 29.

[31] Zhan R., Wen H., Gao X., Yin L.: “Successful term pregnancy after laparoscopic surgery of low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma”. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.), 2014, 127, 391.

[32] Jin Y., Li Y., Deng C.Y., Tian Q.J., Chen H., Pan L.Y.: “Fertility- sparing treatment of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma”. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med., 2015, 8, 5818.

[33] Laurelli G., Falcone F., Scaffa C., Messalli E.M., Del Giudice M., Losito S., et al.: “Fertility-sparing management of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: analysis of an institutional series and review of the literature”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2015, 195, 61.

[34] Xie W., Cao D., Yang J., Jiang X., Shen K., Pan L., et al.: “Fertility- sparing surgery for patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma”. Oncotarget, 2017, 8, 10602.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top