Article Data

  • Views 521
  • Dowloads 121

Original Research

Open Access

Risk factors for breast cancer development in patients with borderline breast lesions: a retrospective analysis of our outpatient facility

  • C. Cedolini1,†
  • S. Bertozzi1,†,*,
  • A. P. Londero2
  • I. Pradelle1
  • S. Bernardi3
  • V. Londero4
  • A. Uzzau1
  • M. Bazzocchi4
  • C. Zuiani4
  • A. Risaliti1

1Clinic of Surgery, DMBS, DISM, University of Udine, Udine, Italy

2Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Polo Hospital, Monfalcone (GO), Italy

3Unit of Surgery, Hospital of Latisana, Latisana (UD), Italy

4Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, DMBS, University of Udine, Udine, Italy

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4536.2019 Vol.40,Issue 4,August 2019 pp.572-578

Accepted: 06 November 2017

Published: 10 August 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): S. Bertozzi E-mail: dr.bertozzi@gmail.com

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Introduction: Women affected by benign or borderline lesions will undergo a follow-up which includes both regular, usually yearly, clinical examinations and imaging repetition. The present study aims to determine how many women with a previous diagnosis of breast lesion of uncertain significance develop breast cancer during follow-up and to assess their risk factors. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included women followed up in the present surgical outpatient facility who underwent a diagnosis of breast lesion of uncertain malignant potential (classified equal or greater than B3 or equal or greater than C3) between January 2003 and June 2014. Main outcomes were the occurrence of breast cancer during follow up and the analysis of possible risk factors for breast cancer development. Results: Among 513 included women, 15 developed breast cancer during the follow up for a borderline breast lesion. The cumulative incidence of new breast cancer diagnosis among women with a previous histological or cytological diagnosis of breast lesion of uncertain malignant potential was 4.3% (95% CI, 1.9-6.6%) at seven years of follow up. Furthermore, the presence of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and lobular intraepithelial neoplasia (LIN) in the surgical excision specimen, as well as the coexistence of hypothyroidism, resulted to be significant risk factors for new breast cancer development among these patients. Conclusions: Due to the great heterogeneity of benign breast disease, further studies are required to better define its risk to evolve into breast cancer, and consequently to optimize their follow up and management in order to reduce over-treatment of low-risk patients, while improving breast cancer diagnosis among high-risk women.

Keywords

Breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential; Breast cancer; Risk factors; Hypothyroidism; Predictive factors

Cite and Share

C. Cedolini,S. Bertozzi,A. P. Londero,I. Pradelle,S. Bernardi,V. Londero,A. Uzzau,M. Bazzocchi, C. Zuiani,A. Risaliti. Risk factors for breast cancer development in patients with borderline breast lesions: a retrospective analysis of our outpatient facility. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(4);572-578.

References

[1] Cedolini C., Bertozzi S., Londero A.P., Bernardi S., Seriau L., Concina S., et al.: “Type of breast cancer diagnosis, screening, and survival”. Clin. Breast Cancer,. 2014, 14, 235.

[2] Driul L., Bernardi S., Bertozzi S., Schiavon M., Londero A.P., Petri R.: “New surgical trends in breast cancer treatment: conservative interventions and oncoplastic breast surgery”. Minerva Ginecol., 2013, 65, 289.

[3] Perry N., Broeders M., de Wolf C., Törnberg S., Holland R., von Karsa L., et al.: “European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis” 4th ed. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2006.

[4] Bernardi S., Londero A.P., Bertozzi S., Driul L., Marchesoni D., Petri R.: “Breast-feeding and benign breast disease”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2012, 32, 58.

[5] Reefy S., Osman H., Chao C., Perry N., Mokbel K.: “Surgical excision for B3 breast lesions diagnosed by vacuum-assisted core biopsy”. Anticancer Res., 2010, 30, 2287.

[6] Londero A.P., Bernardi S., Bertozzi S., Angione V., Gentile G., Dri C., et al.: “Synchronous and metachronous breast malignancies: a cross-sectional retrospective study and review of the literature”. Biomed. Res. Int., 2014, 2014, 250727.

[7] Bernardi S., Bertozzi S., Londero A.P., Angione V., Petri R., Giacomuzzi F.: “Prevalence and risk factors of intraoperative identification failure of sentinel lymph nodes in patients affected by breast cancer”. Nucl. Med. Commun., 2013, 34, 664.

[8] Bernardi S., Bertozzi S., Londero A.P., Gentile G., Angione V., Petri R.: “Influence of surgical margins on the outcome of breast cancer patients: a retrospective analysis”. World J. Surg., 2014, 38, 2279.

[9] Cedolini C., Bertozzi S., Seriau L., Londero A.P., Concina S., Cattin F., et al.: “Eight-year experience with the intraoperative frozen section examination of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer in a North-Italian university center”. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol., 2014, 7, 364.

[10] Bernardi S., Bertozzi S., Londero A.P., Giacomuzzi F., Angione V., Dri C., et al.: “Nine years of experience with the sentinel lymph node biopsy in a single Italian center: a retrospective analysis of 1,050 cases”. World J. Surg., 2012, 36, 714.

[11] Cedolini C., Bertozzi S., Seriau L., Londero A.P., Concina S., Moretti E., et al.: “Feasibility of concervative breast surgery and intraoperative radiation therapy for early breast cancer: a single-center, open, non-randomized, prospective pilot study”. Oncol. Rep., 2014, 31, 1539.

[12] Bernardi S., Bertozzi S., Londero A.P., Gentile G., Giacomuzzi F., Carbone A.: “Incidence and risk factors of the intraoperative localization failure of nonpalpable breast lesions by radio-guided occult lesion localization: a retrospective analysis of 579 cases”. World. J. Surg., 2012, 36, 1915.

[13] Goehring C., Morabia A.: “Epidemiology of benign breast disease, with special attention to histologic types”. Epidemiol. Rev., 1997, 19, 310.

[14] Liang J., Shang Y.: “Estrogen and cancer”. Annu. Rev. Physiol., 2013, 75, 225.

[15] Chlebowski R.T., Manson J.E., Anderson G.L., Cauley J.A., Aragaki A.K., Stefanick M.L., et al.: “Estrogen plus progestin and breast cancer incidence and mortality in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2013, 105, 526.

[16] Kahlenborn C., Modugno F., Potter D.M., Severs W.B.: “Oral contraceptive use as a risk factor for premenopausal breast cancer: a meta-analysis”. Mayo Clin. Proc., 2006, 81, 1290.

[17] Charlton B.M., Rich-Edwards J.W., Colditz G.A., Missmer S.A., Rosner B.A., Hankinson S.E., et al.: “Oral contraceptive use and mortality after 36 years of follow-up in the Nurses’ Health Study: prospective cohort study”. BMJ, 2014, 349, g6356.

[18] Zervoudis S., Iatrakis G., Tomara E., Bothou A., Papadopoulos G., Tsakiris G.: “Main controversies in breast cancer”. World J. Clin. Oncol., 2014, 5, 359.

[19] Feig S.A.: “Screening mammography benefit controversies: sorting the evidence”. Radiol. Clin. North Am., 2014, 52, 455.

[20] Houssami N., Abraham L.A., Onega T., Collins L.C., Sprague B.L., Hill D.A., et al.: “Accuracy of screening mammography in women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical hyperplasia of the breast”. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 2014, 145, 765.

[21] Cuneo K.C., Dash R.C., Wilke L.G., Horton J.K., Koontz B.F.: “Risk of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in women with atypical papillary lesions of the breast”. Breast J., 2012, 18, 475.

[22] Garmendia Madariaga A., Santos Palacios S., Guillén-Grima F., Galofré J.C.: “The incidence and prevalence of thyroid dysfunction in Europe: a meta-analysis”. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 2014, 99, 923.

[23] De Sibio M.T., de Oliveira M., Moretto F.C.F., Olimpio R.M.C, Conde S.J., Luvizon A.C., et al.: “Triiodothyronine and breast cancer”. World J. Clin. Oncol., 2014, 5, 503.

[24] Hardefeldt P.J., Eslick G.D., Edirimanne S.: “Benign thyroid disease is associated with breast cancer: a meta-analysis”. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 2012, 133, 1169.

[25] Kalache A., Vessey M.P., McPherson K.: “Thyroid disease and breast cancer: findings in a large case-control study”. Br. J. Surg., 1982, 69, 434.

[26] Goldman M.B.: “Thyroid diseases and breast cancer”. Epidemiol. Rev., 1990, 12, 16.

[27] Cristofanilli M., Yamamura Y., Kau S.W., Bevers T., Strom S., Patangan M., et al.: “Thyroid hormone and breast carcinoma. Primary hypothyroidism is associated with a reduced incidence of primary breast carcinoma”. Cancer, 2005, 103, 1122.

[28] Kuijpens J.L.P., Nyklíctek I., Louwman M.W.J., Weetman T.A.P., Pop V.J.M., Coebergh J.W.W.: “Hypothyroidism might be related to breast cancer in post-menopausal women”. Thyroid, 2005, 15, 1253.

[29] Ditsch N., Liebhardt S., Von Koch F., Lenhard M., Vogeser M., Spitzweg C., et al.: “Thyroid function in breast cancer patients”. Anticancer Res., 2010, 30, 1713.

[30] Heywang-Köbrunner S.H., Nährig J., Hacker A., Sedlacek S., Höfler H.: “B3 Lesions: Radiological Assessment and Multi-Disciplinary Aspects”. Breast Care (Basel), 2010, 5, 209.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top