Article Data

  • Views 511
  • Dowloads 150

Original Research

Open Access

Lymphovascular space invasion and positive peritoneal cytology are independent prognostic factors for lymph node metastasis and recurrence in endometrial cancer

  • N. Yildirim1,*,
  • A. Bilgi1
  • S.G. Gokulu1
  • L. Akman1
  • O. Zekioglu2
  • G. Serin2
  • N. Ozdemir2
  • S. Alanyali3
  • Z. Ozsaran3
  • A.A. Ozsaran1
  • M.C. Terek1

1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey

2Department of Pathology, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey

3Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo4539.2018 Vol.39,Issue 6,December 2018 pp.977-983

Published: 15 December 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): N. Yildirim E-mail: nuri-yildirim@hotmail.com

Abstract

Aim: The aim is to identify the risk factors for recurrence and lymphatic metastasis of endometrial cancer. Materials and Methods: Patients who were operated primarily for endometrial cancer between 2010-2016 were included. Parameters such as stage, grade, histology, depth of invasion, cytology status, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and tumor size were recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify pathological predictors of lymphatic dissemination and recurrence. Results: A total of 278 patients were evaluated. Mean age was 60. 80% were Stage I, 10% were Stage III, and 4% were Stage IV, and 36.7% of patients had LVSI. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 56% of patients and lymphatic metastasis was observed in 7.1% of patients. In 13 patients, recurrence occurred; seven were loco-regional and six were distant. Three patients who had recurrence (3/13) were in early stage. With multivariate analysis, LVSI [OR = 8.826;1.874-41.576 (95%CI), p = 0.006] and positive cytology [OR = 9.503;1.811- 49.876 (95%CI), p = 0.008] were independent factors for recurrence in endometrial cancer. Additionally, for lymphatic metastasis, LVSI [OR = 6.195;1.258-30.506 (95%CI), p = 0.025] and positive cytology [OR = 14.258; 2.330-87.247 (95%CI), p = 0.004] were found as significant risk factors. Conclusion: LVSI and positive cytology are significant risk factors for lymphatic metastasis and recurrence in endometrial cancer. Patients who had these risk factors should be followed-up more cautiously in terms of recurrence.

Keywords

Endometrial cancer; Lymph node; Lymphovascular space invasion; Peritoneal cytology; Recurrence.

Cite and Share

N. Yildirim,A. Bilgi,S.G. Gokulu,L. Akman,O. Zekioglu,G. Serin,N. Ozdemir,S. Alanyali,Z. Ozsaran,A.A. Ozsaran,M.C. Terek. Lymphovascular space invasion and positive peritoneal cytology are independent prognostic factors for lymph node metastasis and recurrence in endometrial cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2018. 39(6);977-983.

References

[1] Nicolaije K.A., Ezendam N.P., Vos M.C., Boll D., Pijnenborg J.M., Kruitwagen R.F., et al.: “Follow-up practice in endometrial cancer and the association with patient and hospital characteristics: a study from the population-based profiles registry”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 129, 324.

[2] Benedetti-Panici P., Basile S., Maneschi F., Alberto Lissoni A., Signorelli M., Scambia G, et al.: “Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs no lymphadenectomy in early stage endometrial carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2008, 100, 1707.

[3] ASTEC Study Group, Kitchener H., Swart A.M., Qian Q., Amos C., Parmar M.K.: “Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomized study”. Lancet, 2009, 373, 125.

[4] Pecorelli S.: “Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2009, 105, 103. Erratum in: Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2010, 108, 176.

[5] Zhang C., Wang C., Feng W.: “Clinicopathological risk factors for pelvic lymph node metastasis in clinical early-stage endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2012, 22, 1373.

[6] Chang S.J., Kong T.W., Kim W.Y., Yoo S.C., Yoon J.H., Chang K.H., et al.: “Lymph-vascular space invasion as a significant risk factor for isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer: a study of 203 consecutive patients”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2011, 18, 58.

[7] Kumar S., Podratz K.C., Bakkum-Gamez J.N., Dowdy S.C., Weaver A.L., McGree M.E., et al.: “Prospective assessment of the prevalence of pelvic, paraaortic and high paraaortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 132, 38.

[8] Creutzberg C.L., van Putten W.L., Koper P.C., Lybeert M.L., Jobsen J.J., Warlam-Rodenhuis C.C., et al.: “Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicenter randomized trial. PORTEC Study Group. Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma”. Lancet, 2000, 355, 1404.

[9] Keys H.M., Roberts J.A., Brunetto V.L., Zaino R.J., Spirtos N.M., Bloss J.D., et al.: “Gynecologic Oncology Group:A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 92, 744. Erratum in: Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 94, 241.

[10] ASTEC/EN.5 Study Group, Blake P., Swart A.M., Orton J., Kitchener H., Whelan T., Lukka H., et al.: “Adjuvant external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC and NCIC CTG EN.5 randomized trials): pooled trial results, systematic review, and meta-analysis”. Lancet, 2009, 373, 137.

[11] Creasman W.T., Odicino F., Maisonneuve P., Quinn M.A., Beller U., Benedet J.L., et al.: “Carcinoma of the corpus uteri. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2006, 95, S105.

[12] Hahn H.S., Lee I.H., Kim T.J., Lee K.H., Shim J.U., Kim J.W., et al.: “Lymphovascular space invasion is highly associated with lymph node metastasis and recurrence in endometrial cancer”. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2013, 53, 293.

[13] Solmaz U., Mat E., Dereli M., Turan V., Gungorduk K., Hasdemir P., et al.: “Lymphovascular space invasion and cervical stromal invasion are independent risk factors for nodal metastasis in endometrioid endometrial cancer”. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2015, 55, 81.

[14] Briët J.M., Hollema H., Reesink N., Aalders J.G., Mourits M.J., ten Hoor K.A., et al.: “Lymphvascular space involvement: an independent prognostic factor in endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 96, 799.

[15] Vaizoglu F., Yuce K., Salman M.C., Basaran D., Calış P., Ozgul N., et al.: “Lymphovascular space involvement is the sole independent predictor of lymph node metastasis in clinical early stage endometrial cancer”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2013, 288, 1391.

[16] Koskas M., Bassot K., Graesslin O., Aristizabal P., Barranger E., Clavel-Chapelon F., et al.: “Impact of lymphovascular space invasion on a nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 129, 292.

[17] Jorge S., Hou J.Y., Tergas A.I., Burke W.M., Huang Y., Hu J.C., et al.: “Magnitude of risk for nodal metastasis associated with lymphvascular space invasion for endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2016, 140, 387.

[18] Mariani A., Webb M.J., Keeney G.L., Lesnick T.G., Podratz K.C.: “Surgical stage I endometrial cancer: predictors of distant failure and death”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2002, 87, 274.

[19] Weinberg L.E., Kunos C.A., Zanotti K.M.: “Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is an isolated poor prognostic factor for recurrence and survival among women with intermediate to high-risk earlystage endometrioid endometrial cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2013, 23, 1438.

[20] Milgrom S.A., Kollmeier M.A., Abu-Rustum N.R., Makker V., Gardner G.J., Barakat R.R., et al.: “Positive peritoneal cytology is highly predictive of prognosis and relapse patterns in stage III (FIGO 2009) endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 130, 49.

[21] Han K.H., Park N.H., Kim H.S., Chung H.H., Kim J.W., Song Y.S.: “Peritoneal cytology: a risk factor of recurrence for non-endometrioid endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 134, 293.

[22] Garg G., Gao F., Wright J.D., Hagemann A.R., Zighelboim I., Mutch D.G., et al.: “The risk of lymph node metastasis with positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2013, 23, 90.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top