Article Data

  • Views 856
  • Dowloads 148

Case Reports

Open Access Special Issue

Stage IA endometrial cancer recurrence around the ureter after laparoscopic surgery

  • Rikiya Sano1,*,
  • Yoshiaki Ota1,*,
  • Soichiro Suzuki1
  • Takuya Moriya2
  • Mitsuru Shiota1

1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, 701-0192 Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan

2Department of Pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, 701-0192 Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo.2021.02.2292 Vol.42,Issue 2,April 2021 pp.360-364

Submitted: 02 October 2020 Accepted: 22 December 2020

Published: 15 April 2021

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology)

*Corresponding Author(s): Rikiya Sano E-mail: sano_r@med.kawasaki-m.ac.jp
*Corresponding Author(s): Yoshiaki Ota E-mail: yoshimon@cj8.so-net.ne.jp

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery has become a standard treatment for early-stage endometrial cancer. Its outcomes are not inferior to those of open surgery, and it has a good prognosis. Thus, there have been a few studies on recurrence patterns in low-risk endometrial cancer. We described the case of a 45-year-old multiparous woman with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA, grade 1 endometrioid endometrial cancer, who was treated with laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. The patient developed isolated recurrence around the left ureter 27 months later, which was also laparoscopically resected. Pathologically, she had a low risk of recurrence; therefore, we had to review our surgical procedures. The findings of a recent study have led to the development of the theory that there is a laparoscopy-specific recurrence pattern. We discussed this recurrence pattern in relation to our patient’s case and aimed that our findings will prompt to reconsider laparoscopic surgery in preventing tumor spread and recurrence in early-stage low risk endometrial cancer.

Keywords

Minimally invasive surgery; Endometrial cancer recurrence; Modified radical hysterectomy;Stage IA endometrial endometrioid cancer

Cite and Share

Rikiya Sano,Yoshiaki Ota,Soichiro Suzuki,Takuya Moriya,Mitsuru Shiota. Stage IA endometrial cancer recurrence around the ureter after laparoscopic surgery. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2021. 42(2);360-364.

References

[1] Morice P, Leary A, Creutzberg C, Abu-Rustum N, Darai E. Endometrial cancer. The Lancet. 2016; 387: 1094–1108.

[2] Keys HM, Roberts JA, Brunetto VL, Zaino RJ, Spirtos NM, Bloss JD, et al. A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecologic Oncology. 2004; 92: 744–751.

[3] Creutzberg CL, van Putten WLJ, Koper PC, Lybeert MLM, Jobsen JJ, Wárlám-Rodenhuis CC, et al. Survival after relapse in patients with endometrial cancer: results from a randomized trial. Gynecologic Oncology. 2003; 89: 201–209.

[4] Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2012; 30: 695–700.

[5] Han KH, Kim HS, Lee M, Chung HH, Song YS. Prognostic factors for tumor recurrence in endometrioid endometrial cancer stages IA and IB. Medicine. 2017; 96: e6976.

[6] Carey MS, O’Connell GJ, Johanson CR, Goodyear MD, Murphy KJ, Daya DM, et al. Good outcome associated with a standardized treatment protocol using selective postoperative radiation in patients with clinical stage I adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Gynecologic Oncology. 1995; 57: 138–144.

[7] Belinson JL, Lee KR, Badger GJ, Pretorius RG, Jarrell MA. Clinical stage I adenocarcinoma of the endometrium-analysis of recurrences and the potential benefit of staging lymphadenectomy. Gynecologic Oncology. 1992; 44: 17–23.

[8] Ureyen I, Karalok A, Turkmen O, Kimyon G, Akdas YR, Akyol A, et al. Factors predicting recurrence in patients with stage IA endometrioid endometrial cancer: what is the importance of LVSI? Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2020; 301: 737–744.

[9] Bendifallah S., Ouldamer L, Lavoue L, Canlorbe G, Raimond E, Coutant C, et al. Patterns of recurrence and outcomes in surgically treated women with endometrial cancer acording to ESMOESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference risk groups: results from the FRANCOGYN study Group. Gynecologic Oncology. 2017; 144: 107–112.

[10] Nikolaos F, Panagiotis A, Konstantinos B, Vassilios S, Iraklis P. Distant ureteral metastasis from colon adenocarcinoma: report of a case and review of literature. Case Reports in Urology. 2014; 2014: 196425.

[11] Shimoyama Y, Ohashi M, Hashiguchi N, Ishihara M, Sakata M, Tamura A, et al. Gastric cancer recognized by metastasis to the ureter. Gastric Cancer. 2000; 3: 102–105.

[12] Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Van Limbergen E, Vergote I. Endometrial cancer. The Lancet. 2005; 366: 491–505.

[13] Turan T, Yilmaz SS, Hizli D, Gündoğdu B, Boran N, Tulunay G, et al. A prospective evaluation of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: is it adequate to perform lymph node dissection up to the inferior mesenteric artery? International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2011; 21: 864–869.

[14] Zhang C, Wang C, Feng W. Clinicopathological risk factors for pelvic lymph node metastasis in clinical early-stage endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2012; 22: 1373–1377.

[15] Briët JM, Hollema H, Reesink N, Aalders JG, Mourits MJE, ten Hoor KA, et al. Lymphvascular space involvement: an independent prognostic factor in endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2005; 96: 799–804.

[16] Guntupalli SR, Zighelboim I, Kizer NT, Zhang Q, Powell MA, Thaker PH, et al. Lymphovascular space invasion is an independent risk factor for nodal disease and poor outcomes in endometrioid endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2012; 124: 31–35.

[17] O’Brien DJ, Flannelly G, Mooney EE, Foley M. Lymphovascular space involvement in early stage well-differentiated endometrial cancer is associated with increased mortality. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2009; 116: 991–994.

[18] Hachisuga T, Kaku T, Enjoji M. Carcinoma of the lower uterine segment. Clinicopathologic analysis of 12 cases. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 1989; 8: 26–35.

[19] Phelan C, Montag AG, Rotmensch J, Waggoner SE, Yamada SD, Mundt AJ. Outcome and management of pathological stage I endometrial carcinoma patients with involvement of the lower uterine segment. Gynecologic Oncology. 2001; 83: 513–517.

[20] Gemer O, Gdalevich M, Voldarsky M, Barak F, Ben Arie A, Schneider D, et al. Lower uterine segment involvement is associated with adverse outcome in patients with stage I endometroid endometrial cancer: results of a multicenter study. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2009; 35: 865–869.

[21] Galaal K., Donkers H., Bryant A., Lopes A. D. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018; 10: Cd006655.

[22] He H, Zeng D, Ou H, Tang Y, Li J, Zhong H. Laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer: systematic review. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2013; 20: 413–423.

[23] Onda T, Yoshikawa H, Mizutani K, Mishima M, Yokota H, Nagano H, et al. Treatment of node-positive endometrial cancer with complete node dissection, chemotherapy and radiation therapy. British Journal of Cancer. 1997; 75: 1836–1841.

[24] Lee M, Kim YT, Kim SW, Kim S, Kim JH, Nam EJ. Effects of uterine manipulation on surgical outcomes in laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2013; 23: 372–379.

[25] Favero G, Miglino G, Köhler C, Pfiffer T, Silva e Silva A, Ribeiro A, et al. Vaginal morcellation inside protective pouch: a safe strategy for uterine extration in cases of bulky endometrial cancers: operative and oncological safety of the method. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2015; 22: 938–943.

[26] Favero G, Anton C, Silva e Silva A, Ribeiro A, Araújo MP, Miglino G, et al. Vaginal morcellation: a new strategy for large gynecological malignant tumor extraction: a pilot study. Gynecologic Oncology. 2012; 126: 443–447.

[27] Seidman MA, Oduyebo T, Muto MG, Crum CP, Nucci MR, Quade BJ. Peritoneal dissemination complicating morcellation of uterine mesenchymal neoplasms. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e50058.

[28] George S, Barysauskas C, Serrano C, Oduyebo T, Rauh–Hain JA, Del Carmen MG, et al. Retrospective cohort study evaluating the impact of intraperitoneal morcellation on outcomes of localized uterine leiomyosarcoma. Cancer. 2014; 120: 3154–3158.

[29] Della Badia C, Karini H. Endometrial stromal sarcoma diagnosed after uterine morcellation in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2010; 17: 791– 793.

[30] Palomba S, Falbo A, Russo T, La Sala GB. Port-site metastasis after laparoscopic surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a systematic review of the published and unpublished data. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2012; 19: 531–537.

[31] Hewett PJ, Thomas WM, King G, Eaton M. Intraperitoneal cell movement during abdominal carbon dioxide insufflation and laparoscopy. An in vivo model. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 1996; 39: S62–S66.

[32] Jones DB, Guo LW, Reinhard MK, Soper NJ, Philpott GW, Connett J, et al. Impact of pneumoperitoneum on trocar site implantation of colon cancer in hamster model. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1995; 38: 1182–1188.

[33] Lee SW, Southall J, Allendorf J, Bessler M, Whelan RL. Traumatic handling of the tumor independent of pneumoperitoneum increases port site implantation rate of colon cancer in a murine model. Surgical Endoscopy. 1998; 12: 828–834.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top