European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology,2025,46(9):71-76 DOI:10.22514/ejgo.2025.122
Original Research
Downregulation of TSPAN1 inhibits angiogenesis in triple-negative breast cancer cells by regulating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway
Yange Wu1,*,, Wenxiu Chen1, Jing Zhang1

1Department of Pathology, Pingshan District People’s Hospital, 518100 Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

*Corresponding Author(s):ygwu6153@163.com (Yange Wu)

History Submitted: 20 May 2025 | Accepted: 21 July 2025 | Published: 15 September 2025
Copyright:  ©2025 The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Collapse table of contents

Abstract

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) progression and invasion highly depends on abnormal angiogenesis. While tetraspanin 1 (TSPAN1) has been implicated in the malignant progression of TNBC, its relationship in tumor angiogenesis remains poorly understood. Methods: Tumor samples were collected from patients with TNBC and analyzed using clinical pathological and Western blot analyses. TSPAN1 expression was knocked down in the TNBC cell line, Hs-578T using siRNA technology. The angiogenic ability of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) was evaluated by lumen formation assay. The Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase (PI3K)/Protein Kinase B (Akt) signaling pathway was detected using western blots. Results: TSPAN1 overexpression in TNBC tumors is linked to metastasis and PI3K/Akt pathway activation. Knockdown of TSPAN1 in TNBC cells, significantly suppressed the tube formation ability of co-cultured HUVECs. Mechanistically, TSPAN1 knockdown significantly inhibited the activity of the PI3K/Akt pathway. Conclusions: In conclusion, TSPAN1 promotes TNBC angiogenesis via activation of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.

Keywords:Triple-negative breast cancer;TSPAN1;PI3K/Akt;Angiogenesis
PDF(8.99 MB)|EndNote (RIS)|BibTeX|RefMan|RefWorks

Cite this article

Yange Wu, Wenxiu Chen, Jing Zhang. Downregulation of TSPAN1 inhibits angiogenesis in triple-negative breast cancer cells by regulating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology,2025,46(9):71-76 DOI:10.22514/ejgo.2025.122

1. Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common disease in women worldwide, with a distinct subtype, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), with a high metastasis index and proliferation rate [1, 2]. Even though breast cancer diagnostics and therapeutics have advanced significantly, TNBC poses a high risk of angiogenesis, metastasis, and drug resistance due to lack of particular targets and focused medicines [3]. Angiogenesis has a crucial part in the metastatic process. Tumor cells can spread to other locations by using new blood vessels as a means of leaving the original tumor and establishing colonies at distant sites [4, 5]. New therapeutic approaches for TNBC require a deeper comprehension of the molecular processes controlling angiogenesis and metastasis.

Tetraspanin 1 (TSPAN1) belongs to the class of tiny transmembrane proteins known as the tetraspanin family. Studies demonstrate that TSPAN regulates the malignant features of cancer cells, such as invasion, metastasis, apoptosis, and proliferation [6]. TSPAN1 is an oncogene that plays important role in tumor growth by increasing its expression in a variety of human malignancies [7, 8, 9]. Previous research revealed that TSPAN1 promotes the proliferation and spread of breast cancer cells [10]. Additionally, TSPAN1 gene expression is linked to advanced gastric cancer and may play a role in angiogenesis and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition [11]. Furthermore, TSPAN1 has been found to enhance breast cancer cell proliferation and metastasis through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt) pathway [10]. It also promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and facilitates metastasis of bile duct carcinoma via PI3K/Akt signaling [12].

The signaling pathway between PI3K and Akt is essential for tumor development, neovascularization, and cell proliferation [13]. Previous research discovered that PI3K/Akt/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) signaling is critical and this signaling pathway is dysregulated in nearly all cases of advanced TNBC [14]. The purpose of this study was to look at TSPAN1’s involvement and mechanism in regulating tumor angiogenesis in TNBC.

2. Methods

2.1 Cell lines

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and TNBC Hs-578T cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). These cells were cultivated at 37 °C in presence of 5% carbon dioxide (CO2) and humidity in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, MT10013CV, Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 3.7 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, FB12999102, Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA), and 50 units/mL of penicillin and streptomycin (15-140-163, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

2.2 Cell transfection

TSPAN1 expression in Hs-578T cells was inhibited by specific siRNA targeting TSPAN1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Scrambled siRNA-transfected cells (si-NC, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) served as controls. The sequences of the TSPAN1 si-1 group were 5′-GGCUCACGACCAAAAAGUAtt-3′ (sense) and 5′-UACUUUUUGGUCGUGAGCCtt-3′ (antisense). The sequences of the TSPAN1 si-2 group were: 5′-GCUUUUGUAUGACAUCCGAtt-3′ (sense), 5′-UCGGAUGUCAUACAAAAGCtg-3′ (antisense). The sequences of the scrambled siRNA group were 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUdTdT-3′ (sense), 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAAdTdT-3′ (antisense). Lipofectamine 3000 (L3000008, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to transfect Hs-578T cells with 50 nM siRNA following manufacturer’s instructions. TSPAN1 expression was detected 48 h after transfection.

2.3 Angiogenesis assays

For this assay, 50 μL Matrigel (8 mg/mL, CB-40234C, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was added into the lower chamber of a 24-well Transwell and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Following this, 1 × 104 HUVECs and Hs-578T cells were co-cultured at 37 °C for 24 h in the lower and upper chambers of Transwell, respectively. Images of tubular structures were captured using an optical microscope (Inverted Fluorescence Microscope, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and the images were counted using ImageJ software (v2021.8.0).

2.4 Western blot analysis

Total protein was extracted from tissues and cells using Radioimmunoprecipitation Assay (RIPA) buffer (P0013B, Beyotime, Shanghai, China), and the concentration was measured using a Bicinchoninic Acid Assay (BCA) kit (P0009, Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Isolated proteins were split into various pieces based on their molecular weights using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The samples were then transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (PVDF, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), blocked with 5% skim milk for 1 h at 25 °C, and incubated with the corresponding primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. After that, the membrane was treated for 1 h with a secondary antibody coupled with horseradish peroxidase (P2369, Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Ultimately, an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (P10010, NCM Biotech, Shanghai, China) was used to visualize the protein band. The bands were quantified using ImageJ 8.0 software, with Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as the internal reference protein. The primary antibodies (1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) analysed were as follows: TSPAN1 (ab254730), PI3K (ab302958), p-PI3K (ab278545), Akt (ab314110), p-Akt (ab8805), Cluster of Differentiation 31 (CD31, ab281583), Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP-2, ab92536), MMP-9 (ab76003) and GAPDH (ab32096).

2.5 Tumor samples

Paraffin-embedded specimens from 126 patients with triple-negative breast cancer admitted to Pingshan District People’s Hospital between January 2021 and December 2023 were gathered for retrospective investigation. Patient’s age at diagnosis, their tumor grade, tumor size, clinical stage, and lymph node status were obtained from the medical data record. The Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) method served as the basis for the histological type. Prior to the follow-up deadline, all patients received routine follow-ups by phone or in-person visits. Informed consent was obtained from those patients in their follow-up visit and their tissue specimens were taken for further investigation. All these cancer tissues were tested for the expression of TSPAN1 by immunohistochemistry.

2.6 Inclusion criteria

Confirmed diagnosis: all patients included in the study were diagnosed with TNBC by pathological examination. Specifically, their tumor showed no expression of the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2).

Sample integrity: the patient’s tumor tissue and corresponding clinical data (including age, tumor size, tumor grade, clinical staging, and lymph node status, etc.) were complete and available.

Ethical approval: all patients or their legal representatives signed an informed consent form, agreeing that their anonymized clinical information will be used for research purposes. The hospital’s ethics committee approved the research plan (approval number: 2023013).

2.7 Exclusion criteria

Non-primary tumor: patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer or non-primary breast cancer confirmed by pathological evaluation were excluded.

Concurrent malignancies: patients diagnosed with other malignant tumors before or at the time as TNBC diagnosis were excluded.

Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy: patients who had received chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or other systemic treatments before surgery were excluded, as these treatments could affect the biological characteristics of the tumor.

Incomplete clinical data: patients with missing or incomplete clinical data were excluded to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility of research results.

2.8 Statistical analyses

The statistical analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS software (version 25, Armonk, NY, USA). The relationship between TSPAN1 expression levels and clinicopathological characteristics was investigated using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact probability method. Differences between the two groups were examined using two-tailed Student’s t-test. Tukey’s post hoc test was employed to determine significance in the group differences. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1 TSPAN1/PI3K/Akt signaling is upregulated in triple-negative breast cancer

To study the significance of TSPAN1 in breast cancer, we first reviewed data from a public database, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and showed that TSPAN1 expression was much greater in breast cancer tissues than in normal breast tissues (Fig. 1A) (p < 0.05). We then tested cancer and adjacent tissues from 20 TNBC patients and found that the expression of TSPAN1 and CD31 was higher in TNBC tissues, accompanied by PI3K/Akt signaling pathway activation (Fig. 1B) (p < 0.001). These results suggested that high expression of TSPAN1, activation of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, and angiogenesis are closely related to the development of TNBC.

TSPAN1/PI3K/Akt signaling is upregulated in triple-negative 
breast cancer. (A) GEPIA website analysis of the expression difference of TSPAN1 
in breast cancer tissues and normal tissues. (B) Protein expression of TSPAN1, 
PI3K, p-PI3K, Akt, p-Akt and CD31 in TNBC cancer tissue and adjacent tissue. 
*: p &lt; 0.05; ***: p &lt; 0.001. n = 20. 
PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; Akt: protein kinase B; TSPAN1: tetraspanin 1; 
TPM: Transcripts Per Million; BRCA: Breast 
invasive carcinoma; CD: Cluster of Differentiation; GAPDH: 
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Fig. 1.TSPAN1/PI3K/Akt signaling is upregulated in triple-negative breast cancer. (A) GEPIA website analysis of the expression difference of TSPAN1 in breast cancer tissues and normal tissues. (B) Protein expression of TSPAN1, PI3K, p-PI3K, Akt, p-Akt and CD31 in TNBC cancer tissue and adjacent tissue. *: p < 0.05; ***: p < 0.001. n = 20. PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; Akt: protein kinase B; TSPAN1: tetraspanin 1; TPM: Transcripts Per Million; BRCA: Breast invasive carcinoma; CD: Cluster of Differentiation; GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

We further examined the association between TSPAN1 expression in TNBC tumor samples and clinical pathological features of breast cancer, such as age, tumor size, T classification, N classification, and TNM stage. Table 1 illustrates the approximate correlation between TSPAN1 expression in TNBC and lymph node metastases, N classification, and T classification. These findings showed that TSPAN1 might play a major role in TNBC metastasis.

Table 1.Association of expression of TSPAN1 with pathological categories in BRCA tumor samples.
Pathological categoryTotalTSPAN1 expressχ2p
LowHigh
Age (yr)
≥426819490.1440.704
<42581840
Tumor size (cm)
≥36285415.947<0.001
<3642935
T category
T12012811.4940.003
T2972473
T3918
N category
N06221411.3980.497
N1451233
N219415
TNM stage
I1310316.236<0.001
II912368
IIIA22418
p < 0.05 was considered significant. n = 126. T: Tumor; N: Node; TSPAN1: tetraspanin 1; TNM: Tumor-Node-Metastasis.

3.2 Knockdown of TSPAN1 inhibits angiogenesis in breast cancer cells

To elucidate the role and mechanism of TSPAN1 in the development of TNBC, we performed siRNA-mediated knockdown of TSPAN1 in the TNBC cell line Hs-578T (Fig. 2A) (p < 0.001). The results showed that knockdown of TSPAN1 could inhibit the expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 angiogenic factors (Fig. 2A) (p < 0.001). Additionally, HUVECs angiogenesis assay showed that knockdown of TSPAN1 could reduce the number of blood vessels (Fig. 2B) (p < 0.001). The above results showed that knockdown of TSPAN1 inhibits angiogenesis by reducing MMP-2 and MMP-9.

Knockdown of TSPAN1 inhibits angiogenesis in breast cancer 
cells. (A) Western blotting to detect the expression of TSPAN1, MMP-2, MMP-9. 
(B) Detection of angiogenesis ability of HUVECs. Values are presented as mean 
± SD. **p &lt; 0.01 vs. si-NC group; ***p &lt; 0.001 vs. si-NC group. n = 3. 
si-NC: siRNA-transfected cells; TSPAN: tetraspanin; MMP: Matrix 
Metalloproteinase; GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Fig. 2.Knockdown of TSPAN1 inhibits angiogenesis in breast cancer cells. (A) Western blotting to detect the expression of TSPAN1, MMP-2, MMP-9. (B) Detection of angiogenesis ability of HUVECs. Values are presented as mean ± SD. **p < 0.01 vs. si-NC group; ***p < 0.001 vs. si-NC group. n = 3. si-NC: siRNA-transfected cells; TSPAN: tetraspanin; MMP: Matrix Metalloproteinase; GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

3.3 Knockdown of TSPAN1 inhibits the PI3K/Akt pathway

Because previous results showed elevation of TSPAN1 and increased activation of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in TNBC tissues, we next investigated whether TSPAN1 regulates the PI3K/Akt pathway in TNBC cells. Knocking down TSPAN1 affects the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway (Fig. 3) (p < 0.001), leading to decreased angiogenesis in TNBC. These findings imply that TSPAN1 plays an essential role in TNBC angiogenesis via the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.

Knockdown of TSPAN1 inhibits the PI3K/Akt 
pathway. Western blotting to detect the expression of TSPAN1, PI3K, p-PI3K, Akt, 
p-Akt in TNBC Hs-578T cells. Values are presented as mean ± SD. 
***p &lt; 0.001 vs. si-NC group. n = 3. TSPAN: 
tetraspanin; PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; Akt: protein kinase B; si-NC: 
siRNA-transfected cells; GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Fig. 3.Knockdown of TSPAN1 inhibits the PI3K/Akt pathway. Western blotting to detect the expression of TSPAN1, PI3K, p-PI3K, Akt, p-Akt in TNBC Hs-578T cells. Values are presented as mean ± SD. ***p < 0.001 vs. si-NC group. n = 3. TSPAN: tetraspanin; PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; Akt: protein kinase B; si-NC: siRNA-transfected cells; GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

4. Discussion

Numerous physiological and pathological processes, such as cancer, the immune system, fertility, and infectious diseases, have been linked to TSPAN1. In the context of tumorigenesis, TSPAN1 may stimulate tumor growth through its effects on angiogenesis, immune function, platelet coagulation, and infection [15]. The association between TSPAN1 expression and TNBC was carefully assessed in this study. TSPAN1 was shown to be strongly expressed in TNBC, its expression was connected to the clinicopathological features and metastasis in patients with TNBC. Additionally, TSPAN1 was shown to suppress the angiogenic potential of HUVECs in TNBC cells. These findings revealed that TSPAN1 may be involved in TNBC angiogenesis by controlling the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. These findings point to TSPAN1 as a viable therapeutic target for treating TNBC.

Angiogenesis, adhesion, degradation, migration, and reattachment are all components of tumor metastasis. A variety of adhesion molecules, proteolytic enzymes, and cytokines participate in these processes [16]. Studies have demonstrated that TSPAN1 expression is positively linked with tumor angiogenesis [11]. Tumor cells can release a range of angiogenic molecules like vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that can directly cause angiogenesis in endothelial cells by stimulating the production of new blood arteries from preexisting ones, which in turn can activate endothelial cells [17]. Additionally, MMPs—primarily MMP-9 and MMP-2—secreted by endothelial cells contribute to the invasive and morphogenic processes that occur during angiogenesis [18]. MMP-2 and MMP-9 promote angiogenesis by degrading basement membrane and extracellular matrix, providing space for endothelial cell migration and invasion. Furthermore, MMP-9 can release VEGF by degrading matrix proteins, enhancing angiogenesis [19]. Our study showed that knockdown of TSPAN1 in TNBC cells could inhibit angiogenesis by suppressing the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9.

Studies have indicated a strong association between angiogenesis and the activation of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. In addition to regulating angiogenic factors, such as angiopoietin and carbon monoxide, activation of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway has been observed to increase the synthesis of VEGF [20]. The PI3K/Akt signaling pathway can also directly activate matrix metalloproteinases such as MMP-2 and MMP-9. Because of this activation, MMP can break down the extracellular matrix, creating channels and room for endothelial cell migration and the angiogenesis process, thus creating new blood vessels [21]. Our findings revealed that TSPAN1 knockdown might decrease the activity of the PI3K/Akt pathway in TNBC cells, consequently decreasing angiogenesis.

The high expression of TSPAN1 in TNBC and its critical involvement in tumor angiogenesis and activation of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway suggest that TSPAN1 is a highly promising therapeutic target. Targeting TSPAN1, through gene silencing, small molecule inhibitors or antibody drugs, is expected to provide more effective treatment options for TNBC patients. Future studies are needed to further verify the safety and efficacy of TSPAN1-targeted therapies. Future studies should also focus on clinical application and optimizing combination treatment strategies to promote the clinical application of TSPAN1 targeted therapy.

This study also has some limitations. The present research on TSPAN1 and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways in triple-negative breast cancer relies solely on in vitro models, which may not fully simulate the complex physiological and pathological environment in the human body. Future studies are needed to better investigate the specific mechanism of action of TSPAN1 in tumor cells and confirm in vivo angiogenesis in xenograft models, combining multi-target treatment strategies to improve the therapeutic effect.

5. Conclusions

Our findings show that TSPAN1 expression is substantially associated with TNBC metastasis, suggesting that it could be a therapeutic target for anti-metastatic TNBC treatment. Additionally, knockdown of TSPAN1 inhibits the angiogenesis of TNBC by inhibiting MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression, as well as the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.

Availability of data and materials

The data analyzed in this study were derived from the medical records of 126 patients with triple-negative breast cancer admitted to Pingshan District People’s Hospital between January 2021 and December 2023. The use of these data was approved by the Ethics Committee of Pingshan District People’s Hospital (Approval no. 2023013). The data are available for review upon reasonable request, subject to patient confidentiality and ethical considerations.

Author contributions

YGW—designed the study and carried them out. YGW, WXC, JZ—supervised the data collection; interpreted the data; prepared the manuscript for publication and reviewed the draft of the manuscript. YGW, WXC—analyzed the data. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Pingshan District People’s Hospital (Approval no. 2023013). Written informed consent was obtained from a legally authorized representative for anonymized patient information to be published in this article.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by Shenzhen City Pingshan District People’s Hospital 2022 President’s Fundation (Grant No. 202210).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Li Y, Zhang H, Merkher Y, Chen L, Liu N, Leonov S, et al. Recent advances in therapeutic strategies for triple-negative breast cancer. Journal of Hematology & Oncology. 2022; 15: 121.

[Google Scholar]

Abbas MA, Al-Kabariti AY, Sutton C. Comprehensive understanding of the role of GPER in estrogen receptor-alpha negative breast cancer. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2024; 241: 106523.

[Google Scholar]

Adrada BE, Moseley TW, Kapoor MM, Scoggins ME, Patel MM, Perez F, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: histopathologic features, genomics, and treatment. RadioGraphics. 2023; 43: e230034.

[Google Scholar]

Elayat G, Selim A. Angiogenesis in breast cancer: insights and innovations. Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2024; 24: 178.

[Google Scholar]

de Heer EC, Jalving M, Harris AL. HIFs, angiogenesis, and metabolism: elusive enemies in breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2020; 130: 5074–5087.

[Google Scholar]

Richardson MM, Jennings LK, Zhang XA. Tetraspanins and tumor progression. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis. 2011; 28: 261–270.

[Google Scholar]

Wang MD, Li HT, Peng LX, Mei Y, Zheng LS, Li CZ, et al. TSPAN1 inhibits metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma via suppressing NF-kB signaling. Cancer Gene Therapy. 2024; 31: 454–463.

[Google Scholar]

Huang H, Li H, Zhao T, Khan AA, Pan R, Wang S, et al. TSPAN1-elevated FAM110A promotes pancreatic cancer progression by transcriptionally regulating HIST1H2BK. Journal of Cancer. 2022; 13: 906–917.

[Google Scholar]

Han J, Xie C, Liu B, Wang Y, Pang R, Bi W, et al. Tetraspanin 1 regulates papillary thyroid tumor growth and metastasis through c-Myc-mediated glycolysis. Cancer Science. 2023; 114: 4535–4547.

[Google Scholar]

Wu Y, Chen W, Gong Y, Liu H, Zhang B. Tetraspanin 1 (TSPAN1) promotes growth and transferation of breast cancer cells via mediating PI3K/Akt pathway. Bioengineered. 2021; 12: 10761–10770.

[Google Scholar]

Cai Y, Zheng M, Zhao Z, Huang H, Fu W, Xu X. Expression of Tspan-1 gene in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Oncology Letters. 2017; 14: 2996–3000.

[Google Scholar]

Wang Y, Liang Y, Yang G, Lan Y, Han J, Wang J, et al. Tetraspanin 1 promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of cholangiocarcinoma via PI3K/Akt signaling. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research. 2018; 37: 300.

[Google Scholar]

Hinz N, Jucker M. Distinct functions of Akt isoforms in breast cancer: a comprehensive review. Cell Communication and Signaling. 2019; 17: 154.

[Google Scholar]

Zhang HP, Jiang RY, Zhu JY, Sun KN, Huang Y, Zhou HH, et al. PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway: an important driver and therapeutic target in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2024; 31: 539–551.

[Google Scholar]

Huang R, Sun H, Lin R, Zhang J, Yin H, Xian S, et al. The role of tetraspanins pan-cancer. iScience. 2022; 25: 104777.

[Google Scholar]

Yousefi T, Mohammadi Jobani B, Taebi R, Qujeq D. Innovating cancer treatment through cell cycle, telomerase, angiogenesis, and metastasis. DNA and Cell Biology. 2024; 43: 438–451.

[Google Scholar]

Guo X, Yang Y, Tang J, Xiang J. Ephs in cancer progression: complexity and context-dependent nature in signaling, angiogenesis and immunity. Cell Communication and Signaling. 2024; 22: 299.

[Google Scholar]

Deryugina EI, Quigley JP. Tumor angiogenesis: MMP-mediated induction of intravasation- and metastasis-sustaining neovasculature. Matrix Biology. 2015; 44–46: 94–112.

[Google Scholar]

Li L, Fan P, Chou H, Li J, Wang K, Li H. Herbacetin suppressed MMP9 mediated angiogenesis of malignant melanoma through blocking EGFR-ERK/Akt signaling pathway. Biochimie. 2019; 162: 198–207.

[Google Scholar]

Wang T, Chen S, Wang Z, Li S, Fei X, Wang T, et al. KIRREL promotes the proliferation of gastric cancer cells and angiogenesis through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2024; 28: e18020.

[Google Scholar]

Jiang BH, Liu LZ. PI3K/PTEN signaling in angiogenesis and tumorigenesis. Advances in Cancer Research. 2009; 102: 19–65.

[Google Scholar]