European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology,2025,46(10):53-60 DOI:10.22514/ejgo.2025.132
Original Research

Phillyrin restrains breast cancer cell growth by inducing ferroptosis

Liangbo Yi1,*,, Feifei Yang2, Zhonglu Yi2

1Department of Rehabilitation, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng University, 024000 Chifeng, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China

2Department of General Practice, Southwest Village Clinic, 024000 Chifeng, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China

*Corresponding Author(s):lbyi999@163.com (Liangbo Yi)

History Submitted: 09 July 2025 | Accepted: 27 August 2025 | Published: 15 October 2025
Copyright:  ©2025  The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Collapse table of contents

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide, predominantly affecting women and associated with high mortality. Phillyrin (PHN), a bioactive compound isolated from Forsythia suspensa (Thunb.) Vahl has been confirmed to possess diverse biological activities, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-tumor effects. Nevertheless, its regulatory role in breast cancer progression remains unclear. Methods: Cell viability was assessed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay, while proliferative capacity was evaluated through colony formation assay. Apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry. The level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was measured by 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) staining. The concentrations of malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH), and Fe2+ were quantified using the corresponding detection kits. Protein expression levels were analyzed by western blotting. Results: PHN significantly inhibited breast cancer cell growth and induced ferroptosis. Treatment with 50 µmol/L PHN reduced cell proliferation, an effect that was reversed by Ferrostatin-1 (Fer-1), a ferroptosis inhibitor. Furthermore, PHN was shown to suppress activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt) signaling pathway. Conclusions: PHN inhibited breast cancer cell growth by inducing ferroptosis and suppressing the PI3K/Akt pathway. These findings suggest that PHN may represent a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of breast cancer.

Keywords:Phillyrin;Ferroptosis;PI3K/Akt pathway;Breast cancer
PDF(2.78 MB)|EndNote (RIS)|BibTeX|RefMan|RefWorks

Cite this article

Liangbo Yi, Feifei Yang, Zhonglu Yi. Phillyrin restrains breast cancer cell growth by inducing ferroptosis.European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology,2025,46(10):53-60 DOI:10.22514/ejgo.2025.132

1. Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women, and its incidence continues to increase annually, posing a significant threat to public health [1, 2]. Current treatment options for breast cancer primarily include surgery, postoperative radiotherapy, and chemotherapy [3], while hormone therapy and targeted therapy are also widely recognized as standard approaches [4, 5]. Nevertheless, recurrence and metastasis remain major clinical issues, making breast cancer treatment highly challenging [6]. Therefore, elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying tumor growth and identifying effective therapeutic agents remains essential for improving breast cancer management.

Phillyrin (PHN), a bioactive compound isolated from Forsythia suspensa (Thunb.) Vahl, has been demonstrated to exert diverse biological functions, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-tumor activities [7]. For instance, PHN inhibits activation of the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, thereby alleviating pulmonary inflammation induced by influenza A virus [8]. It also antagonizes endothelin-1 signaling to protect against myocardial remodeling [9]. In sepsis-induced acute lung injury, PHN mitigates damage by suppressing the pyroptosis pathway [10]. In addition, PHN inhibits cell proliferation and angiogenesis in colorectal cancer by targeting cluster of differentiation 147 (CD147) [11]. In hepatocellular carcinoma, PHN downregulates topoisomerase IIα (TOP2A), thereby modulating the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) pathway to reduce tumorigenesis [12]. Despite these findings, the precise regulatory effects of PHN and its associated pathways in breast cancer progression have not yet been clarified.

Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the role of PHN in breast cancer progression and explore its underlying molecular mechanisms, with particular attention to ferroptosis and the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Our findings demonstrated that PHN significantly inhibited breast cancer cell growth by inducing ferroptosis and suppressing PI3K/Akt pathway activation, supporting PHN as a potential therapeutic candidate breast cancer treatment.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Cell culture and treatment

Breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and BT549) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA) and cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; 11965084, Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented as recommended. Cells were maintained in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Phillyrin (PHN; S392602, Shanghai Selleck Chemicals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was used at concentrations of 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 200 µmol/L. Based on preliminary results, 25 and 50 µmol/L PHN were selected for subsequent experiments [12].

2.2 Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay

MDA-MB-231 and BT549 cells were seeded into 96-well plates and treated accordingly. CCK-8 solution (10 µL/well; CK04, Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) was added and incubated for 2 h. Absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer (ND-ONE-W, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to determine cell viability.

2.3 Colony formation assay

MDA-MB-231 and BT549 cells were seeded in 6-well plates and incubated for 14 days. Colonies were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, stained with 0.1% crystal violet, and imaged. Colony numbers were subsequently counted for analysis.

2.4 Flow cytometry

MDA-MB-231 and BT549 cells were harvested and resuspended in binding buffer. The cells were stained in the dark with 5 µL FITC Annexin V (556420, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and 10 µL propidium iodide. Then, the apoptotic cells were quantified using a flow cytometer (FACSCanto II, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).

2.5 ROS examination

MDA-MB-231 and BT549 cells were mixed with 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA; E004-1-1, Nanjing Jiancheng Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China), and the corresponding fluorescence signals were captured using a fluorescence microscope (BX41, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

2.6 Detection of MDA, ROS and Fe2+

The levels of malondialdehyde (MDA; ab118970, Abcam, Shanghai, China), glutathione (GSH; ab112132, Abcam, Shanghai, China), and Fe2+ (ab83366, Abcam, Shanghai, China) were quantified using the corresponding commercial kits, following the manufacturers’ protocols.

2.7 Western blot

Proteins were extracted from MDA-MB-231 and BT549 cells and separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). They were subsequently transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). After blocking, membranes were incubated with primary antibodies for 12 h, followed by incubation with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:1000; ab7090, Abcam, Shanghai, China) for 2 h. Protein bands were visualized using a chemiluminescence detection kit (89880, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

The primary antibodies used includes: p-PI3K (1:1000; ab235266), PI3K (1:1000; ab40755), p-Akt (1:1000; ab8933), Akt (1:2000; ab8805), and β-actin (1:1000; ab8226).

2.8 Statistical analysis

All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Differences between groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1 PHN suppressed cell growth in breast cancer

Cell viability was significantly reduced following treatment with 100 and 200 µmol/L PHN, whereas no changes were observed at concentrations of 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 25, and 50 µmol/L (Fig. 1a), indicating that PHN exhibited no cytotoxicity at or below 50 µmol/L, and therefore 25 and 50 µmol/L were selected for subsequent experiments. Consistently, colony formation assays revealed that cell proliferative capacity was significantly reduced after treatment with 25 and 50 µmol/L PHN (Fig. 1b). Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis demonstrated that apoptosis was significantly increased under the same treatment conditions (Fig. 1c). These findings suggest that PHN may effectively suppress breast cancer cell growth.

PHN suppressed cell growth in breast cancer. (a) Cell viability 
was assessed by CCK-8 assay following treatment with PHN at concentrations of 0, 
2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 200 µmol/L. (b) Cell proliferation was 
evaluated by colony formation assay in the 0, 25, and 50 µmol/L PHN groups. 
(c) Cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry in the 0, 25, and 50 
µmol/L PHN groups. **p &lt; 0.01, 
***p &lt; 0.001. Abbreviations: PHN, Phillyrin; PI, propidium 
iodide; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate.

Fig. 1.PHN suppressed cell growth in breast cancer. (a) Cell viability was assessed by CCK-8 assay following treatment with PHN at concentrations of 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 200 µmol/L. (b) Cell proliferation was evaluated by colony formation assay in the 0, 25, and 50 µmol/L PHN groups. (c) Cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry in the 0, 25, and 50 µmol/L PHN groups. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Abbreviations: PHN, Phillyrin; PI, propidium iodide; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate.

3.2 PHN triggered ferroptosis in breast cancer

DCFH-DA staining revealed that intracellular ROS levels were significantly elevated following treatment with 25 and 50 µmol/L PHN (Fig. 2a). Consistently, MDA levels were also increased in response to PHN treatment (Fig. 2b). In contrast, GSH levels were markedly reduced after PHN exposure (Fig. 2c), and Fe2+ levels were significantly increased in PHN-treated cells (Fig. 2d). Together, these findings indicate that PHN induced ferroptosis in breast cancer cells.

PHN triggered ferroptosis in breast cancer. (a) Intracellular 
ROS levels were evaluated by DCFH-DA staining in the 0, 25, and 50 µmol/L 
PHN groups. (b) MDA levels were measured using the MDA assay kit. (c) GSH levels 
were determined with the GSH assay kit. (d) Fe2+ levels were quantified 
using the Fe2+ assay kit. *p &lt; 0.05, 
**p &lt; 0.01, ***p &lt; 0.001. Abbreviations: 
PHN, Phillyrin; GSH, glutathione.

Fig. 2.PHN triggered ferroptosis in breast cancer. (a) Intracellular ROS levels were evaluated by DCFH-DA staining in the 0, 25, and 50 µmol/L PHN groups. (b) MDA levels were measured using the MDA assay kit. (c) GSH levels were determined with the GSH assay kit. (d) Fe2+ levels were quantified using the Fe2+ assay kit. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Abbreviations: PHN, Phillyrin; GSH, glutathione.

3.3 PHN restrained breast cancer cell growth by inducing ferroptosis

Colony formation assays demonstrated that cell proliferation was markedly reduced following treatment with 50 µmol/L PHN; however, this inhibitory effect was reversed by the ferroptosis inhibitor Fer-1 (Fig. 3a). Similarly, flow cytometry revealed that apoptosis was significantly increased after 50 µmol/L PHN treatment, whereas co-treatment with Fer-1 attenuated this effect (Fig. 3b). In addition, western blot analysis showed that the protein expression levels of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11) were reduced after PHN exposure, but this reduction was reversed by Fer-1 treatment (Fig. 3c). Collectively, these findings indicate that PHN inhibited breast cancer cell growth by inducing ferroptosis.

PHN restrained breast cancer cell growth by inducing 
ferroptosis. (a) Cell proliferation was evaluated by colony formation assay in 
the 0 µmol/L PHN, 50 µmol/L PHN, and 50 µmol/L PHN + Fer-1 
groups. (b) Cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry under the same 
treatment conditions. (c) The protein expression levels of GPX4 and SLC7A11 were 
determined by western blot analysis. ***p &lt; 0.001 
vs. 0 µmol/L PHN group; ##p &lt; 0.01, ###p &lt; 0.001 vs. 50 µmol/L PHN group. Abbreviations: PHN, Phillyrin; 
Fer-1, Ferrostatin-1; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4; SLC7A11, solute carrier 
family 7 member 11.

Fig. 3.PHN restrained breast cancer cell growth by inducing ferroptosis. (a) Cell proliferation was evaluated by colony formation assay in the 0 µmol/L PHN, 50 µmol/L PHN, and 50 µmol/L PHN + Fer-1 groups. (b) Cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry under the same treatment conditions. (c) The protein expression levels of GPX4 and SLC7A11 were determined by western blot analysis. ***p < 0.001 vs. 0 µmol/L PHN group; ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 vs. 50 µmol/L PHN group. Abbreviations: PHN, Phillyrin; Fer-1, Ferrostatin-1; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4; SLC7A11, solute carrier family 7 member 11.

3.4 PHN retarded the PI3K/Akt pathway

Western blot analysis revealed that the ratios of p-PI3K/PI3K and p-Akt/Akt were significantly reduced following PHN treatment at 25 and 50 µmol/L (Fig. 4a). Furthermore, the downregulation of p-PI3K/PI3K and p-Akt/Akt induced by 50 µmol/L PHN was reversed by co-treatment with Fer-1 (Fig. 4b). These findings indicate that PHN inhibited activation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, and that this effect was dependent on ferroptosis.

PHN inhibited the PI3K/Akt pathway. (a) Protein expression 
levels of p-PI3K, PI3K, p-Akt, and Akt were analyzed by western blot in the 0, 
25, and 50 µmol/L PHN groups. ***p &lt; 0.001. (b) Protein 
expression levels of p-PI3K, PI3K, p-Akt, and Akt were determined by western blot 
in the 0 µmol/L PHN, 50 µmol/L 
PHN, and 50 µmol/L PHN + Fer-1 groups. ***p &lt; 0.001 
vs. 0 µmol/L PHN group; ##p &lt; 0.01, ###p &lt; 0.001 vs. 50 µmol/L PHN group. Abbreviations: PHN, Phillyrin; 
Fer-1, Ferrostatin-1; p-PI3K, phosphorylated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; 
p-Akt, phosphorylated protein kinase B.

Fig. 4.PHN inhibited the PI3K/Akt pathway. (a) Protein expression levels of p-PI3K, PI3K, p-Akt, and Akt were analyzed by western blot in the 0, 25, and 50 µmol/L PHN groups. ***p < 0.001. (b) Protein expression levels of p-PI3K, PI3K, p-Akt, and Akt were determined by western blot in the 0 µmol/L PHN, 50 µmol/L PHN, and 50 µmol/L PHN + Fer-1 groups. ***p < 0.001 vs. 0 µmol/L PHN group; ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 vs. 50 µmol/L PHN group. Abbreviations: PHN, Phillyrin; Fer-1, Ferrostatin-1; p-PI3K, phosphorylated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; p-Akt, phosphorylated protein kinase B.

4. Discussion

PHN has been reported to exert anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-tumor activities [8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. However, its regulatory role in breast cancer has remained unclear. In the present study, we demonstrated that PHN suppressed breast cancer cell growth, providing new insights into its potential therapeutic value.

Ferroptosis is a recently identified form of iron-dependent programmed cell death that has attracted considerable attention in cancer research in recent years [13]. Significant progress has been made in understanding its role in breast cancer. For example, neutrophils can regulate aconitate decarboxylase 1 to suppress ferroptosis, thereby promoting breast cancer metastasis [14]. Metformin has been shown to inhibit ubiquitin-fold modifier 1 (UFMylation) of SLC7A11, leading to ferroptosis induction in breast cancer [15]. In contrast, DnaJ/Hsp40 homolog subfamily C, member 12 (DNAJC12) can inhibit doxorubicin-induced ferroptosis, resulting in chemotherapy resistance [16]. Furthermore, curcumenol enhances ferroptosis in triple‑negative breast cancer by regulating the SLC7A11/NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells)/TGF-β (transforming growth factor beta) pathway [17]. Notably, PHN has been reported to increase tumor cell sensitivity to ferroptosis in lung cancer [18]. Consistent with these findings, our results demonstrated that PHN induced ferroptosis in breast cancer cells. In particular, treatment with 50 µmol/L PHN significantly reduced cell proliferation, whereas this effect was reversed by the ferroptosis inhibitor Fer-1, confirming the involvement of ferroptosis in the anti-tumor action of PHN.

The PI3K/Akt pathway plays a pivotal role in tumorigenesis [19], and increasing evidence indicates that it is critically involved in breast cancer progression. For example, baicalein suppresses breast cancer growth by blocking the PI3K/Akt pathway and enhancing autophagy [20]. Similarly, curcumol inhibits breast cancer development by modulating this signaling cascade [21], while polyphyllin II restrains tumorigenesis by regulating the same pathway [22]. Beyond cancer, PHN has also been reported to inhibit the PI3K/Akt pathway in non-malignant conditions, such as diabetic nephropathy, where it alleviates pathological changes [23] and reduces oxidative stress and inflammation [24]. In line with these observations, our study demonstrated that PHN inhibited the PI3K/Akt pathway in breast cancer cells, and this effect was closely associated with ferroptosis induction.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated that PHN inhibited breast cancer cell growth by inducing ferroptosis and suppressing the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. However, several limitations should be acknowledged: (1) the absence of clinical studies; (2) the lack of human samples; (3) the absence of in vivo animal experiments; and (4) the limited evaluation of PHN concentrations. Future investigations could address these limitations by including lower PHN concentrations, expanding the range of experimental groups, and incorporating both animal models and clinical samples, for a more comprehensive understanding of the specific effects of PHN in breast cancer.

Availability of data and materials

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and any raw data can be obtained from the corresponding author upon request.

Author contributions

LBY—designed the study and carried them out. LBY, FFY, ZLY—supervised the data collection; analyzed the data; interpreted the data; prepared the manuscript for publication and reviewed the draft of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Barzaman K, Karami J, Zarei Z, Hosseinzadeh A, Kazemi MH, Moradi-Kalbolandi S, et al. Breast cancer: biology, biomarkers, and treatments. International Immunopharmacology. 2020; 84: 106535.

[Google Scholar]

Valente S, Roesch E. Breast cancer survivorship. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2024; 130: 8–15.

[Google Scholar]

Xiong X, Zheng LW, Ding Y, Chen YF, Cai YW, Wang LP, et al. Breast cancer: pathogenesis and treatments. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2025; 10: 49.

[Google Scholar]

Korde LA, Somerfield MR, Carey LA, Crews JR, Denduluri N, Hwang ES, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted therapy for breast cancer: ASCO guideline. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2021; 39: 1485–1505.

[Google Scholar]

Lau KH, Tan AM, Shi Y. New and emerging targeted therapies for advanced breast cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23: 2288.

[Google Scholar]

Gouri A, Benarba B, Dekaken A, Aoures H, Benharkat S. Prediction of late recurrence and distant metastasis in early-stage breast cancer: overview of current and emerging biomarkers. Current Drug Targets. 2020; 21: 1008–1025.

[Google Scholar]

Zhou C, Lu M, Cheng J, Rohani ER, Hamezah HS, Han R, et al. Review on the pharmacological properties of phillyrin. Molecules. 2022; 27: 3670.

[Google Scholar]

Zhang S, Sun F, Zhu J, Qi J, Wang W, Liu Z, et al. Phillyrin ameliorates influenza a virus-induced pulmonary inflammation by antagonizing CXCR2 and inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Journal of Virology. 2023; 20: 262.

[Google Scholar]

Luo Q, Liu Q, Tang K, Zhong B, Yang S, Li X. Phillyrin improves myocardial remodeling in salt-sensitive hypertensive mice by reducing endothelin1 signaling. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2024; 76: 672–680.

[Google Scholar]

Ji C, Hao X, Li Z, Liu J, Yan H, Ma K, et al. Phillyrin prevents sepsis-induced acute lung injury through inhibiting the NLRP3/caspase-1/GSDMD-dependent pyroptosis signaling pathway. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. 2024; 57: 447–462.

[Google Scholar]

Huang Y, Cheng N, Zhi Y, Qiao D, Wang Y, Ma M, et al. Phillyrin from Forsythia suspensa suppresses the proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis of colorectal cancer via targeting CD147. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2025; 347: 119759.

[Google Scholar]

Zhu Y, Huang F, Liu X, Hou Y, Huang Y. Phillyrin regulates the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway by inhibiting TOP2A expression to accelerate ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology Reports. 2025; 53: 43.

[Google Scholar]

Jiang X, Stockwell BR, Conrad M. Ferroptosis: mechanisms, biology and role in disease. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2021; 22: 266–282.

[Google Scholar]

Zhao Y, Liu Z, Liu G, Zhang Y, Liu S, Gan D, et al. Neutrophils resist ferroptosis and promote breast cancer metastasis through aconitate decarboxylase 1. Cell Metabolism. 2023; 35: 1688–1703.e10.

[Google Scholar]

Yang J, Zhou Y, Xie S, Wang J, Li Z, Chen L, et al. Metformin induces Ferroptosis by inhibiting UFMylation of SLC7A11 in breast cancer. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research. 2021; 40: 206.

[Google Scholar]

Shen M, Cao S, Long X, Xiao L, Yang L, Zhang P, et al. DNAJC12 causes breast cancer chemotherapy resistance by repressing doxorubicin-induced ferroptosis and apoptosis via activation of AKT. Redox Biology. 2024; 70: 103035.

[Google Scholar]

Li F, Qi Q, Qiao Y, Huang Y, Lu Y, Gu K, et al. Curcumenol inhibits malignant progression and promotes ferroptosis via the SLC7A11/NF‑κB/TGF‑β pathway in triple‑negative breast cancer. International Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2025; 56: 111.

[Google Scholar]

Tang X, Teng J, Lu K. Phillyrin sensitizes lung cancer cells to ferroptosis through inhibiting FTH1/SLC7A11 axis. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2024; 62: 8–19.

[Google Scholar]

Glaviano A, Foo ASC, Lam HY, Yap KCH, Jacot W, Jones RH, et al. PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling transduction pathway and targeted therapies in cancer. Molecular Cancer. 2023; 22: 138.

[Google Scholar]

Yan W, Ma X, Zhao X, Zhang S. Baicalein induces apoptosis and autophagy of breast cancer cells via inhibiting PI3K/AKT pathway in vivo and vitro. Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 2018; 12: 3961–3972.

[Google Scholar]

Wei ZL, Juan W, Tong D, Juan LX, Sa LY, Jie HFM, et al. Curcumol inhibits breast cancer growth via NCL/ERα36 and the PI3K/AKT pathway. Food & Function. 2023; 14: 874–885.

[Google Scholar]

Miao W, Wang Z, Gao J, Ohno Y. Polyphyllin II inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation via the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Molecular Medicine Reports. 2024; 30: 224.

[Google Scholar]

Wang T, Wen X, Zhang Z, Xie M, Zhou J. Phillyrin ameliorates diabetic nephropathy through the PI3K/Akt/GSK-3β signalling pathway in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Human & Experimental Toxicology. 2021; 40: S487–S496.

[Google Scholar]

Yang C, Bao L, Shi Z, Xv X, Jiang D, You L. Phillyrin alleviates high glucose-induced oxidative stress and inflammation in HBZY-1 cells through inhibition of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2024; 76: 776–787.

[Google Scholar]