European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology,2025,46(11):21-26 DOI:10.22514/ejgo.2025.135
Original Research
Delayed colposcopy outcomes and risk factors at a tertiary center in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic
Esra Isci Bostanci1,*,, Yasin Durmus2, Ayse Sinem Duru Coteli3, Fulya Kayikcioglu3, Nurettin Boran3

1The Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, 06560 Ankara, Turkey

2The Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, 55070 Samsun, Turkey

3The Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Etlik Zübeyde Hanim Women’s Health Training and Research Hospital, 06010 Ankara, Turkey

*Corresponding Author(s):dresrai@yahoo.com.tr (Esra Isci Bostanci)

History Submitted: 23 April 2025 | Accepted: 04 July 2025 | Published: 15 November 2025
Copyright:  ©2025  The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Collapse table of contents

Abstract

Background: We aimed to assess the impact of colposcopies being delayed because of the pandemic and determine whether any causes of lagging at the time of colposcopy for abnormal cytology or human papilloma virus (HPV) positive cases. Methods: This is a retrospectice cohort study. Delayed colposcopy due to COVID-19 pandemic was performed to a total number of 158 patients and are analysed for the following informations; age of diagnosis, smoking status, age at first coitus, oral contraceptive use, number of sexual partner, menopausal status, colposcopy delayed duration (from the date of the HPV-cytology result to the colposcopy date), cytology, HPV status, colposcopic findings and pathologic results. Results: There were significances between smoking status/colposcopic biopsy results and HPV status/colposcopic biopsy results. We also investigated the correlation between the length of the duration (latency) and the other parameters such as HPV status, colposcopic results (histopathological results) and colposcopic highest lesions. According to statistical analysis, there was no relationship between the length of duration and colposcopic histopathological results. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic had affected healthcare systems all around the world. It had changed the treatment and control durations of the diseases for a period. Smoking status has a great role for the progression into high grade lesions in HPV positive cases. On the other hand, latency up to 6 months does not affect the progression to a high grade lesion so this is important in follow-up duration.

Keywords:COVID-19 pandemic;Delayed colposcopy;HPV status
PDF(303.41 kB)|EndNote (RIS)|BibTeX|RefMan|RefWorks

Cite this article

Esra Isci Bostanci, Yasin Durmus, Ayse Sinem Duru Coteli, Fulya Kayikcioglu, Nurettin Boran. Delayed colposcopy outcomes and risk factors at a tertiary center in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic.European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology,2025,46(11):21-26 DOI:10.22514/ejgo.2025.135

1. Introduction

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) represents the preinvasive disease of the uterine cervix. Progression from a CIN to invasive cervical cancer is typically slow, offering a valuable window for intervention. Prevention programs that combine high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) DNA testing with cervical cytology provides early detection of the cervical abnormalities and help minimize missed diagnoses [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic, profoundly altering healthcare delivery worldwide. During a pandemic, to preserve critical resources, each country introduced various system-wide modifications [6]. As a result, most surgical procedures were deferred, with many cancer patients experiencing significant delays. Professional societies stratified interventions by urgency and recommended postponement of all elective procedures. Likewise, screening programs and colposcopic evaluation of preinvasive cervical and vulvar lesions were incorporated into this triage framework.

The Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) classified vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN II–III), vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN II–III) and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN II–III) as non-urgent, permitting delays of up to 12 weeks. The American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical pathology (ASCCP) guidelines similarly allowed follow-up for high-grade cervical screening abnormalities to be deferred for up to three months, and for low-grade abnormalities for 6–12 months. Furthermore, individuals with high-grade cervical disease without suspicion of invasion were advised to schedule evaluation within three months, while those with suspected invasive disease required assessment within four weeks of the initial report [7, 8].

The first case of the novel coronavirus was reported in March 2020 in Turkey. Following a circular issued that month by the Turkish Ministry of Health, all elective surgeries were suspended, and both the national screening program and colposcopic evaluation of preinvasive cervical and vulvar lesions were postponed. In this study, we reported our center’s experience with delayed colposcopies and explore potential causes of these delays. We also examine the relationship between oral contraceptive use and tobacco use with the HPV status and colposcopic biopsy outcomes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate colposcopy delays during the COVID-19 pandemic, and it may serve as a guide for managing similar latency in future public health crises.

2. Materials and methods

Our colposcopy unit is one of three referral centers for Turkey’s national HPV cancer screening program, which is coordinated by the Early Diagnosis, Screening and Training of Cancer Centers (KETEM). This program relies on primary high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) testing, with colposcopy ordinarily scheduled 15–30 days after referral. However, at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, all scheduled colposcopies were cancelled.

Patients whose appointments were postponed received detailed explanations of the delay; once the “new normal” protocols were in place, the unit reopened in June 2020 and patients were rescheduled. Between March and June 2020, 220 women had been booked for colposcopy; 158 ultimately attended follow-up, while the remainder were lost to follow-up. This retrospective cohort study was approved by Etlik Zübeyde Hanim Women’s Health, Training and Research Hospital Training Plan and Coordination Board Committee (05/2020-No: 7). Ethics approval and consent to participate were obtained.

In this retrospective study, we recruited 158 patients and analysed the following information; age of diagnosis, smoking status, age at first coitus, oral contraceptive use, number of sexual partner, menopausal status, colposcopy delayed duration (from the date of the HPV-cytology result to the colposcopy date), cytology, HPV status, colposcopic findings and pathologic results based on the patients’ charts and medical files. While we included all cases that refer to the colposcopy unit; patients who had refuse to apply excluded. We could not obtain any information about these lost cases.

All colposcopies were performed by gynecologic oncologists using a Leica CLS 150 XC MS5 colposcope (Wetzlar, HE, Germany). After applying 3% acetic acid to the cervix, lesions were described according to color, borders, and vascular patterns. Punch biopsy procedure performed in the cases that have abnormal colposcopic findings such as acetowhite area, mosaic pattern, punctuation, rag sign, ulceration and inadequate colposcopic procedure. Histopathologic diagnoses were categorized as: negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM), low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL).

Statistical data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 21 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables were assessed for normality using histograms, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and the Shapiro-Wilk test. The categorical data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods and correlations between length of duration and clinicopathological variables were compared by chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. For continuous data, comparisons utilized Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate. All statistical tests were two-sided, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

The demographic, behavioral, and clinical characteristics of the 158 women are presented in Table 1. The mean age was 42.3 ± 8.7 years (range, 22–64 years), and the mean age at first coitus was 19.6 ± 3.7 years (range, 13–35 years). Correlation of oral contraceptive use, smoking status, age, and HPV status with the colposcopic biopsy results were mentioned in Table 2. A significant relationship was observed between smoking status and biopsy result (p = 0.034), as well as between HPV status and biopsy result (p = 0.032). There were only two patients with cervical cancer who have the initial cytolgy of atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H) and latency of colposcopic evaulation were under 3 months.

Table 1.Characteristics of the patients.
CharacteristicsPatients
(n = 158)
Percentage (%)
Age (yr)42.3 (22–64)
Oral contraceptive use
Yes5434.1
No10465.9
Smoking status
Yes6943.6
No8956.4
HPV status
HPV negative127.6
HPV 16/18/other HR-HPV positive10365.2
HPV other HR-HPV positive4327.2
Cytology
NILM8654.4
ASCUS2415.2
ASC-H117.0
LSIL117.0
HSIL21.3
AGC-NOS53.2
EC/TZ Absent/Insufficient1912.0
SCCnone
Histopathology
Normal9660.8
LSIL3119.6
HSIL2213.9
SIL74.4
SCC21.3
Colposcopy findings
Normal3924.7
AWA9962.7
Mosaic pattern74.4
Punctuation85.1
Rag sign21.3
Ulceration21.3
Inadequate10.6

HR-HPV: high-risk human papillomavirus; NILM: negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy; ASCUS: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; HSIL: high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; LSIL: low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; ASC-H: atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude HSIL; AGC-NOS: atypical glandular cells not otherwise specified; EC/TZ: Endocervics/Transformation zone; SCC: squamous cell carcinoma; SIL: squamous intraepithelial lesion; AWA: Acetowhite area.

Table 2.Correlation of oral contraceptive use, smoking status, age and HPV status between the colposcopic biopsy results.
≤Low-grade lesions
(≤LSIL)
High-grade lesions
(HSIL, SCC)
p value
OCP status
Yes34110.129
No7513
Smoking status
Yes43150.034*
No669
Age
<24 yr510.704
>30 yr10423
HPV status
HPV 16/18 positive76210.032*
HPV other HR-HPV positive383

*: statistically significant; OCP: Oral contraceptive pill; LSIL: low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; HSIL: high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; SCC: squamous cell carcinoma; HR-HPV: high-risk human papillomavirus.

The mean interval between receipt of the HPV-cytology report and performance of colposcopy was 140 days (range, 21–340 days). Patients were stratified into three delay categories: ≤3 months, 3–6 months, and >6 months. Correlations between delay interval and HPV status, highest colposcopic lesion, and histopathological outcome are summarized in Table 3. There were no significant associations between delay duration and histopathological grade (p = 0.642), HPV status (p = 0.126), or severity of the highest colposcopic lesion (p = 0.930).

Table 3.Correlation of colposcopic histopathologic results, HPV status, and colposcopic highest lesion between the delayed duration.
<3 mon3–6 mon>6 monp value
Colposcopic histopathologic results
Low-grade lesions1882250.642
High-grade lesions5146
HPV status
HPV negative11010.126
HPV 16/18 positive215923
HPV other HR-HPV positive3328
Colposcopic highest lesion
Low-grade lesions1773230.930
High-grade lesions5146

HR-HPV: high-risk human papillomavirus.

4. Discussion

The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly altered global healthcare dynamics, and its impact is evident in gynecologic practice. In response, guidelines and national health policies introduced modified algorithms that became entrenched in clinical workflows. Although several publications have addressed colposcopic management of abnormal cervical screening results during the pandemic, literature remains limited [1, 9, 10, 11, 12].

The joint recommendations of the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) and the European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO) stratify urgency based on cytologic and histologic findings. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), atypical glandular cells-favor neoplastic (AGC-FN), endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ, or adenocarcinoma required evaluation within four weeks of their results. Those with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H), or atypical glandular cells not otherwise specified (AGC-NOS) should undergo assessment within one to three months. Conversely, individuals with a positive high-risk HPV test and normal cytology, a positive high-risk HPV test with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) may safely defer evaluation for up to six to twelve months, provided they remain asymptomatic [9]. Given these guidelines, we investigated the extent of diagnostic delays induced by the pandemic and their potential associations with clinical and histopathological outcomes.

Appropriate follow-up intervals are critical to reduce the progression of the preinvasive lesions. Clinicians must clearly communicate recommended surveillance schedules while managing patient anxiety. The challenge is to avoid both overtreatment and undertreatment. In our cohort, delays of ≤3 months, 3–6 months, and >6 months were not significantly associated with differences in histopathological outcomes on colposcopic biopsy.

Personalized risk-based management of cervical disease has gained traction under the ASCCP 2019 Guidelines [7]. These guidelines aim to reduce reliance on colposcopy a costly and subjective procedure by leveraging both the declining prevalence of HSIL in vaccinated populations and individualized risk stratification to guide direct referral [10].

In this research, the significant relation between smoking status and colposcopic biopsy results supports the strong influence of smoking on HPV persistence and progression. According to the results of a cohort study that includes 1976 women, smoking increases the risk of HPV by reducing immunity. It increases susceptibility to high-risk HPV infection particularly HPV 16, by lowering specific antibody titers, whereas past smoking exposure exerts no comparable cumulative effect [13]. In a Chinese study the association between smoking behaviors during follow-up and clearance of HPV infection in women with HPV-positive and pathologically normal uterine cervix, investigated using a propensity score matching analysis.

The main finding of the study was that smoking is associated with a decreased clearance of HPV [14].

In our cohort, HPV genotype was significantly associated with lesion grade, whereas no correlation emerged between delay duration and HPV status. A prospective Chinese study demonstrated that HSILs associated with HPV 16 were the largest, followed by those related to HPV 31/33 and HPV 18 [15]. Consistent with these findings, we observed that HSILs driven by HPV 16/18 were more prevalent and pronounced than lesions attributed to other high-risk genotypes.

In the present study, neither age at first intercourse nor oral contraceptive use was associated with colposcopic biopsy outcomes, likely reflecting our limited sample size. However, previous research has linked early onset of sexual activity to increased risk of disease progression among HPV-positive women [16, 17]. While active HPV infection often reflects recent exposure, latent or persistent infections may be influenced by past sexual behavior [18]. Conversely, oral contraceptive use has been identified as a key risk factor for cervical neoplasia and potentially accelerating epithelial maturation and lesion development [19, 20].

5. Conclusions

Cervical cancer preventive strategies continue to evolve, with variations in implementation and timing across different real-world settings. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare systems all around the world. It had changed the timelines for diagnosis, treatment, and disease. These circumstances highlighted the need for structured management approaches for cervical preinvasive lesions [21, 22]. Although the sample is old and that is the limitation of this study, our findings highlighted the significant role of smoking and HPV genotype in the development of high-grade lesions. Importantly, delays of up to six months did not appear to influence progression to high-grade disease, suggesting that such latency may be acceptable in follow-up protocols.

Abbreviations

HR-HPV, High risk Human Papillomavirus; VIN, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia; VAIN, vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; ASCUS, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; LSIL, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; HSIL, high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; AGC-NOS, atypical glandular cells not otherwise specified; AGC-FN, atypical glandular cells, favor neoplastic; ASCCP, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical pathology; EFC, European Federation for Colposcopy; ESGO, European Society of Gynecological Oncology; SGO, Society of Gynecologic Oncology; KETEM, Early Diagnosis, Screening and Training of Cancer Centers; NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy; SIL, squamous intraepithelial lesion; ASC-H, atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude HSIL.

Availability of data and materials

The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Author contributions

EIB, FK—Concept/design. EIB, YD, ASDC—Data collection and processing. YD—Analysis and interpretation. EIB—Writing manuscript. NB, EIB—Critical review.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Etlik Zübeyde Hanim Women’s Health, Training and Research Hospital (2020-07). As a retrospective study, the requirement for informed consent was waived by the IRB.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Wang Y, Kang Y, Yu F, Zhong FH, Huang K, Zhou X, et al. TruScreen detection of cervical tissues for high-risk human papillomavirus-infected women during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Future Oncology. 2021; 17: 1197–1207.

[Google Scholar]

March C, Landoni F, Mahner S, McCormack M, Gonzalez-Martin A, Colombo N; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Cervical cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology. 2017; 28: iv72–iv83.

[Google Scholar]

McCredie MR, Sharples KJ, Paul C, Baranyai J, Medley G, Jones RW, et al. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet Oncology. 2008; 9: 425–434.

[Google Scholar]

Vink MA, Bogaards JA, van Kemenade FJ, de Melker HE, Meijer CJ, Berkhof J. Clinical progression of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: estimating the time to preclinical cervical cancer from doubly censored national registry data. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2013; 178: 1161–1169.

[Google Scholar]

Cox JT, Castle PE, Behrens CM, Sharma A, Wright TC III, Cuzick J; Athena HPV Study Group. Comparison of cervical cancer screening strategies incorporating different combinations of cytology, HPV testing, and genotyping for HPV 16/18: results from the ATHENA HPV study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013; 208: 184.e1–184.11.

[Google Scholar]

Allan M, Lievre M, Laurenson-Schafer H, de Barros S, Jinnai Y, Andrews S, et al. The World Health Organization COVID-19 surveillance database. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2022; 21: 167.

[Google Scholar]

Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, Chelmow D, Einstein MH, Garcia F, et al. 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 2020; 24: 102–131.

[Google Scholar]

Fader AN, Huh WK, Kesterson J, Pothuri B, Wethington S, Wright JD, et al. When to operate, hesitate and reintegrate: Society of Gynecologic Oncology surgical considerations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gynecologic Oncology. 2020; 158: 236–243.

[Google Scholar]

Ciavattini A, Carpini GD, Giannella L, Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Joura EA, et al. European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) joint considerations about human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, screening programs, colposcopy, and surgery during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2020; 30: 1097–1100.

[Google Scholar]

Winata IGS, Juniarti SE. Cervical cancer screening in COVID-19 pandemic era. Hong Kong Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2020; 3: 01–04.

[Google Scholar]

Ciavattini A, Delli Carpini G, Giannella L, De Vincenzo R, Frega A, Cattani P, et al. Expert consensus from the Italian Society for Colposcopy and Cervico-Vaginal Pathology (SICPCV) for colposcopy and outpatient surgery of the lower genital tract during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2020; 149: 269–272.

[Google Scholar]

Jach R, Mazurec M, Trzeszcz M, Zimmer M. Possible deferral of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for patients with abnormal screening tests results in cervical cancer secondary prevention in current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic interim guidelines of the Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians and the Polish Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathophysiology. Ginekologia Polska. 2020; 91: 428–431.

[Google Scholar]

Eldridge RC, Pawlita M, Wilson L, Castle PE, Waterboer T, Gravitt PE, et al. Smoking and subsequent HPV infection: a mediation analysis. Annals of Epidemiology. 2017; 27: 724–730.

[Google Scholar]

Ma K, Li S, Wu S, Zhu J, Yang Y. Impact of smoking exposure on human papillomavirus clearance among Chinese women: a follow-up propensity score matching study. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 2023; 21: 42.

[Google Scholar]

Zhou Q, Gong Y, Qiu X, Sui L, Zhang H, Wang Y, et al. Visual appearance of the uterine cervix differs on the basis of HPV type status in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: the results of a reliable method. BMC Women’s Health. 2022; 22: 24.

[Google Scholar]

Mosciscki AB. HPV infections in adolescents. Disease Markers. 2007; 23: 229–234.

[Google Scholar]

Ribeiro AA, Costa MC, Alves RR, Villa LL, Saddi VA, Carneiro MA, et al. HPV infection and cervical neoplasia: associated risk factors. Infectious Agents and Cancer. 2015; 10: 16.

[Google Scholar]

Lenselink CH, Melchers WJG, Quint WGV, Hoebers AMJ, Hendriks JCM, Massuger LFAG, et al. Sexual behaviour and HPV infections in 18 to 29 year old women in the pre-vaccine era in the Netherlands. PLOS ONE. 2008; 3: e3743.

[Google Scholar]

Hwang LY, Ma Y, Benningfield SM, Clayton L, Hanson EN, Jay J, et al. Factors that influence the rate of epithelial maturation in the cervix in healthy young women. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2009; 44: 103.

[Google Scholar]

Yetimalar H, Kasap B, Cukurova K, Yildiz A, Keklik A, Soylu F. Cofactors in human papillomavirus infection and cervical carcinogenesis. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2012; 285: 805–810.

[Google Scholar]

Willows K, Selk A, Auclair MH, Jim B, Jumah N, Nation J, et al. 2023 Canadian colposcopy guideline: a risk-based approach to management and surveillance of cervical dysplasia. Current Oncology. 2023; 30: 5738–5768.

[Google Scholar]

Alimena S, Lykken JM, A Tiro J, Chubak J, Kamineni A, Haas JS, et al. Timing of colposcopy and risk of cervical cancer. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2023; 142: 1125–1134.

[Google Scholar]