Preoperative work-up of early cervical cancer (Stages lb-Ila)

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of preoperative investigations in early cervical cancer.

Materials: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 309 patients with previously untreated early cervical carcinoma who completed pretreatment evaluation at "St. Savas" Cancer Hospital of Athens and "Metaxas" Memorial Hospital of Peireas between January 1986 and September 1, 2000. Ages ranged from 18-77 years old with a mean age of 48 and S.D. of 12.25. FIGO staging was Ib (200 pts.), IIa (105 pts.), IV (4 pts.). Histologic type was squamous (267 pts.), adenoid (35 pts.), adenosquamous (7 pts.). The patients were clinically examined and routinely evaluated with blood work-up, chest X-ray, IVP, abdominal CT scan, barium enema, sigmoidoscopy, cystoscopy, and/or urine cytology. Patients with early stage cervical carcinoma were treated with Wertheim-Meigs radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, while those with advanced stage cervical carcinoma were treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Results: In urinary tract investigation, CT showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99.67%. In gastrointestinal tract investigation CT showed a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 99.67%. When we compared the histologic findings of the pelvic lymph nodes that were extracted in surgically treated patients with the preoperative CT findings, we found that CT had a sensitivity of 63.33% and a specificity of 88.57%.

Conclusion: In our series of patients with early stage cervical carcinoma, imaging and endoscopic tests added limited information over pelvic examination and altered in four cases (1.29%) the choice of the appropriate treatment modality. CT scans proved adequate in this series of patients in the evaluation of the bladder and colon. All other tests could have been performed only when CT was suspicious of invasion. Moreover, CT served as a baseline examination for future comparative studies in the follow-up of patients.

Early cervical carcinoma; Preoperative work-up

[1] Benedet J. L. et al.: "FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynaecologic cancers" Internat. J. Gynecol. Obstet., 2000, 70, 209.

[2] Walsh J. W. et al.: "Prospective comparison between clinical and CT staging in primary cervical carcinoma". Amer. J. Roentgenol., 1981, 137, 997.

[3] Sundborg M. J. et al.: "Cystoscopy after computed tomography scan to identify bladder invasion in cervical cancer". Ohstet. Gynecol., 1981, 92, 364.

[4] Montana G. S. et al.: "Carcinoma of the cervix: Patterns of care studies: Review of 1978, 1983, and 1988-1989 surveys". Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 1995, 32, 5, 1481.

[5] Massad L. S. et al.: "Assessing disease extent in women with bulky or clinically evident metastatic cervical cacner: yield of pretreatment studies". Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 76, 383.

[6] Danforth's Obstetrics & Gynecology: "Disorders of the utenne cervix". 1999, Chapt., 49, 820.

[7] Feigen M. et al.:'The value of lymphoscintigraphy, lymphangiography and computer tomography scanning in the preoperative assessment of lymph nodes involved by pelvic malignant conditions". Surg., Gynecol. Obstet., 1987, 165, 107.

[8] Matsukuma K. et al.: "Preoperative CT study of lymph nodes in cervical cancer-its correlation with histologic findings". Gynecol. Oncol., 1989, 33, 168.