Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Taxanes in the first-line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer: Review
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the University-Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baden, Gennany
*Corresponding Author(s): M. Friedrich E-mail:
Taxanes belong to the most effective agents in the treatment of advanced and non-hormone responsive breast cancer. Several recently published phase III studies have examined the role of taxane-anthracycline combinations in the first line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Especially, patients with symptomatic visceral spread seem to benefit from taxanes containing polychemotherapy that is adequately dosed. Polychemotherapy with taxanes appears to be more effective than monotherapy. But at present, there are no adequate data concerning the comparison of taxane-monotherapy and anthracycline-containing polychemotherapy. New hopeful results with respect to efficacy and toxicity are reported from the docetaxel-capecitabine polychemotherapy. Thus, the combination of anthracyclines (adriamycin, doxorubicin) and taxanes (docetaxel, paclitaxel) is a promising tool in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. New interesting combinations are under investigation.
Breast cancer; Metastases; Chemotherapy; Taxanes
M. Friedrich,D. Diesing,C. Villena-Heinsen,R. Felberbaum,H.C. Kolberg,K. Diedrich. Taxanes in the first-line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer: Review. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2004. 25(1);66-70.
[1] Landis S.H., Murray T., Bolden S.: "Cancer Statistics, 1999". CA. Cancer J. Clin., 1999, 49, 8.
[2] Cooper R.G.: "Combination chemotherapy in hormone-resistant breast cancer". Proc. Am. Soc. Cancer Res., 1969, 10, 15.
[3] Hoogstraaten B., George S.L., Sama! B.: "Combination chemotherapy and adriamycin in patients with advanced breast cancer". Cancer, 1976, 38, 13.
[4] Mouridsen H.T.: "Systemic therapy of advanced breast cancer". Drugs, 1992, 44, 17.
[5] Ingle J.N., Maillard J.A., Schaid D.J. et al.: "Randomized trial of doxorubicin alone or combined with vincritsine and mitomycin C in women with metastatic breast cancer". Am. J. Clin. Oncol., 1989, 12, 474.
[6] Neidhart J.A., Gochnour D., Roach R. et al.: "A comparison of mitoxantrone and doxorubicin in breast cancer". J. Clin. Oncol., 1986, 4, 672.
[7] Vaughn C.B., Green S.J., O'Bryan R. et al.: "VP-16 + adriarnycin versus adriamycin in advanced adenocarcinoma of the breast: Phase II, a randomized trial - A Southwest Oncology Group Study". Med. Pediatr. Oncol., 1988, 16, 312.
[8] Henderson LC., Allegra J.C., Woodcock T. et al.: "Randomized clinical trial comparing mitoxantrone with doxorubicin in previously treated patients with metastatic breast cancer". J. Clin. Oncol., 1989, 7, 560.
[9] Hortobabyi G.N., Yap H.Y., Kau S.W. et al.: "A comparative study of doxorubicin and epirubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer". Am. J. Clin. Oncol., 1989, 12, 57.
[10] Perez D.J., Harvey V.J., Robinson B.A. et a/.: "A randomized comparison of single-agent doxorubicin and epirubicin as first-line cytotoxic therapy in advanced breast cancer". J. Clin. Oncol., 1991, 9, 2148.
[11] van Oosterom A.T.: "Docetaxel (taxotere): An effective agent in the management of second-line breast cancer". Semin. Oncol., 1995, 22 (suppl. 13), 22.
[12] Fumeleau P., Seidman A.D., Trudeau M.E. et al.: "Docetaxel: A new active agent in the therapy of metastatic breast cancer". Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs, 1997, 6, 1853.
[13] Trudeau M.E.: "Docetaxel (Taxotere): An overview of first-line monotherapy". Semin. Oncol., 1995, 22 (suppl. 13), 17.
[14] Parideans R., Biganzoli L., Bruning P. et al.: "Paclitaxel versus doxorubicin as fust-line single-agent chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized study with crossover". J. Clin. Oncol., 2000, 18, 724.
[15] Sledge G.W., Neuberg D., Ingle J. et al.: "Phase III trial of doxorubicin (A) versus paclitaxel (T) versus doxorubicin + paclitaxel (A + T) as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC): an Intergroup trial". Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 1997, 16 (abstr. 2), la.
[16] Chan S., Friedrichs K., Noel D. et al.: "Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The 303 Study Group". J. Clin. Oncol., 1999, 17, 2341.
[17] Nabholtz J.M., Senn H.J., Bezwoda W.R. et al.: "Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus mitomycin C plus vinblastine in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy". J. Clin. Oncol., 1999, 17, 1413.
[18] Sjostrom J., Blomquist C., Mouridsen H. et al.: "Docetaxel compared with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced breast cancer after anthracycline failure: A randomized phase III study with crossover on progression by th Scandinavian Bresat Group". Eur. J. Cancer, 1999, 35, 1194.
[19] Bonneterre J., Monnier A., Roche H. et al.: "Taxotere versus 5-fluorouracil + nevelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer as second line chemotherapy". Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 1997, 50 (abstr. 564), 162a.
[20] Friedrich M., Wasemann C., Ertan A.K. et al.: "Randomized phase II study of docetaxel vs epirubicin/cyclophosphamide to optimize first-line therapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC): Preliminary results of the TIPP Study". Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oneal., 2002 (abstr. 2028), 21a.
[21] Nabholtz J.M., Falkson G., Campos D. et al.: "A phase III trial comparing doxorubicin (A) and docetaxel (T) (AT) to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) as first line chemotherapy for MBC". Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oneal., 1999, 18 (abstr. 485), 125a.
[22] Nabholtz J.M., Paterson A., Dirix L. et al.: "A phase III randomized trial comparing docetaxel (T), doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) to PAC as first line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer". Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 2001, 20 (abstr. 83), 22a.
[23] Bonneterre J.M., Dieras V., Tubiana-Hulin M. et al.: "Epiru bicin/docetaxel (ET) versus 5-FU/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (PAC) as first line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer". Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 2001, 69 (abstr. 27), 215a.
[24] Jassem J., Pienkowski T., Pluzanska A. et al.: "Doxorubicin and pacliatxel versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: results of randomized phase III multicenter trial". J. Clin. Oncol., 2001, 19, 1707.
[25] Biganzoli L., Cufer T., Bruning P. et al.: "Doxorubicin(A)/taxol(T) versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (C) as first line chemotherapy inb metastatic breast cancer: A phase III study". Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 2000, 19 (abstr. 282), 73a.
[26] Carmichael J.: "UKCCR trial of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) versus epirubicin and taxol (ET) in the first line treatment in women withmetastatic breast cancer". Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 2001, 20 (abstr. 84), 22a.
[27] Liick H.J., Thomssen C., Untch M. et al.: "Multicentric phase III study in first line treatment of advanced metastatic breast cancer. Epirubicin/paclitaxel (ET) versus epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC). A study of the AGO Breast Cancer Group". Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 2000, 19 (abstr. 280), 73a.
[28] O'Shaugnessy J., Miles D., Vukelja S. et al.: "Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracydine- pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results". J. Clin. Oncol., 2002, 20 (12), 2812.
[29] Nabholtz J.M., Gelman K., Bontenbal M. et al.: "Multicenter randimized comparative study of two doses of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer". J. Clin. Oncol., 1996, 14, 1858.
[30] Peretz T., Sulkes A., Chollet P. et al.: "A multicenter randomized study of two schedules of paclitaxel (ptx) in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC)". Eur. J. Cancer, 1995, 31a (abstr. 345), 75 .
[31] Winer E., Berry D., Duggan D. et al.: "Failure of higher dose paclitaxel to improve outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer - results from CALGB 9342". Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 1998, 17 (abstr. 388), 101a.
[32] Smith R.E., Brown A.M., Mamounas E.P. et al.: "Randomized trial of 3-h versus 24-h infusion of high-dose paclitaxel in patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast: National Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-26. J. Clin. Oncol., 1999, 17, 3403.
[33] Holmes F.A., Valero V., Buzdar A.U. et al.: "Final results: randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel of 3-h versus 96-h infusion in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer: the long and short of it". Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 1998, 15 (abstr. 426), 106a.
Top