Laparoscopic coagulation of the uterine blood supply in laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy is associated with less blood loss

Background: Does laparoscopic coagulation of the uterine blood supply decrease blood loss compared with transvaginal ligature of the uterine vessels?

Methods: Intra- and postoperative data of 446 patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy at the Department of Gynecology, University of Jena, between 1998 and 2001 were analysed. In 213 patients the uterine blood supply was transected laparoscopically at the origin of the uterine vessels (LAVH type II) and in 233 patients (LAVH type I) transvaginally.

Results: Patients in both groups were comparable with respect to median age, Quetelet index, and parity. The drop of hemoglobin between the preoperative day and postoperative day 3 was 0.8 mmol/l or 0.6 mmol/l for LAVH type I without or with BSO vs 0.3 mmol/l or 0.4 mmol/l for LAVH type II without or with BSO (p = 0.001), respectively. Median operative time was similar for both techniques: LAVH type I 136 min or with BSO 128 min vs LAVH type II 126 min or with BSO 131 min. The weight of the removed uteri was significantly lower in LAVH type I vs type II (220 vs 270 grams), but similar when LAVH was combined with BSO (160 vs 178 grams). The rate of intraoperative complications was 2.2% vs 0.9% between LAVH type I or II (n.s.), but 9% vs 3.3% for overall postoperative complications (p = 0.01).

Conclusions: Laparoscopic coagulation of the uterine blood supply at the origin of uterine vessels is a safe technique which minimizes blood loss in LAVH. In patients with a low preoperative hemoglobin value this technique is indicated.

Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy; Laparoscopic coagulation of the uterine artery; Morbidity; Blood loss

[1] Dorsley J.H., Holtz P.M., Griffiths R.I., MacGrath M.M., Stemberg E.L.: "Cost and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy". New Engl. Med., 1996, 335, 476.

[2] Ellstrom M., Ferraz-Nunes J., Hahlin M.. Olsson J.-H.: "A randomized trial with a cost-consequence. Analysis after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy". Obstet. Gynecol., 1998, 91, 30.

[3]Falcone T., Fidela M., Edward M.: "Prospective randomized elmical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy". Ohstet. Gynecol., 1999, 180, 955.

[4] Fylstra D.L., Carter J.F.: "Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital: Decreasing the need for abdominal hysterectomy and increasing resident experience in vaginal surgery". J. Reprod. Med., 1996, 41,497

[5] Harkki-Siren P., Sjoberg J.: "Evaluation and the learning curve of the first one hundred laparoscopic hysterectomies". Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1995, 74, 638.

[6] Kankipati S.R., Barry J.A.: "A randomised prospective study of laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy each with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy". Br. J. Ohstet Gynaecol., 1994. 101, 1068.

[7] Kohler C., Hasenbein K., Klemm P., Tozzi R.. Schneider A (2002): "Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with lateral transsection of the uterine vessels". Surg. Endosc., 2003, 17 (3), 485.

[8] Kovac S.R.: "Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy". Obstet. Gynecol., 1995, 85, 18.

[9] Malik E., Schidt M., Scheidel P.: "Komplikationen nach 106 laparoskopischen Hysterektomien". Zentralblatt fiir Gyniikologie, 1997, 119, 611.

[10] Marana R.,Busacca M., Zupi E., Garcea N., Paparella P., Catalano G.F.: "Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective, randomized multicenter study". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1999, 180, 270.

[11] Munro M.G., Parker W.H.: "A classification system for laparoscopic hysterectomy". Ohstet. Gynecol., 1993, 82, 624.

[12] Nezhat F.,N ezhat C.H.,A dmon D.,G ordon S.,N azhat C.: "Complications and results of 361 hysterectomies performed at laparoscopy". J. Am. Coll. Surg., 1995, 180 (3), 307.

[13] Olsson J.H., Ellstrom M., Hahlin M.: "A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy" Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1996, 103, 345.

[14] Phipps J.H., John M., Nayak S.: "Comparison of laparoscopically aassisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-ophorectomy. Br. J. Ohstet. Gynaecol.. 1993, 100, 689.

[15] Song I.. Cho S.l., Park C.S., Kim S.H., Ku P.S., Lee M.A.: "Two uterine arterial management methods in laparoscopic hysterectomy". J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 1998, 24 (2). 145.

[16] Schlitz K., Possover M., Merker A., Michels W., Schneider A.: "Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) with abdominal hysterectomy (AH) for the treatment of the uterus weighing more tha 200 gram". Surg Endosc., 2002, 16, 121.

[17] Shwayder J.M.: "Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy''. Ohstet. Gynecol. Clin. North. America, 1999, 26, 169.

[18] Summitt R., Stovall T., Steege J., Lipscomb G.: "A multicenter randomised comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidates". Obstet. Gynecol., 1998, 92 (3), 321.

[19] Unger J.B.: "Vaginal hysterectomy for the woman with a moderately enlarged uterus weighing 200 to 700 grams". Am. J. Ohstet Gynecol., 1999, 180, 1337.

[20] Wilke G., Rath W., KulenkampffD., Kuhn W.: "Dielaparoskopisch assistierte vaginale Hysterektomie (L AVH) mit dem Endo GIA TM 30". Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde,1993, 53, 384.