Article Data

  • Views 1259
  • Dowloads 124

Original Research

Open Access

Ultrasonographic criteria and tumor marker assay are good procedures for the diagnosis of ovarian neoplasia in preselected outpatients

  • E.F.C. Murta1,*,
  • C.S. da Silva1
  • R.A.S. Gomes2
  • B.M. Tavares-Murta2
  • A.L.K.O. Melo3

1Discipline of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Brazil

2Department of Biological Sciences, Brazil

3Discipline cJj Imaging Science, Faculty of Medicine of Triiingulo Mineiro, Uberaba-MG, Brazil

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo200406707 Vol.25,Issue 6,November 2004 pp.707-712

Published: 10 November 2004

*Corresponding Author(s): E.F.C. Murta E-mail:

Abstract

Purpose of investigation: To identify parameters for the diagnosis of ovarian neoplasia using ultrasonography (US) and serum tumor marker (TM: CA125, CA19.9, CA15.3, AFP, CEA and estradiol) assay.

Methods: Prospective study which included 373 women with increased ovarian volume (> 18 cm3 in premenopause and > 8 cm3 in postmenopause). US criteria (> or = 1) for surgery were: persistent (> 4 months) or increased cyst, cysts with > 1 thick septum or > or = 2 thin septa, cyst diameter > or = 7 cm, vegetation, calcification or cystic predominance (> 50%), solid tumor (> 50%). Doppler with a resistance index (RI) < 0.4 was considered abnormal.

Results: Laparotomy was performed in 164 (44%) patients with 66 (40.2%) benign neoplasias and 19 (11.6%) malignant cases (73.6% at Stage I or II). Two hundred and nine patients were maintained on clinical follow-up. The sensitivity for neoplasia and malignant neoplasia was, respectively, for RI: 17 and 63.6 and RI plus TM: 53.1 and 90.9.

Conclusion: Ultrasound criteria and TM assay were indicated for the diagnosis of ovarian neoplasia.

Keywords

Ovarian neoplasia; Ultrasonography; Tumor markers; Doppler

Cite and Share

E.F.C. Murta,C.S. da Silva,R.A.S. Gomes,B.M. Tavares-Murta,A.L.K.O. Melo. Ultrasonographic criteria and tumor marker assay are good procedures for the diagnosis of ovarian neoplasia in preselected outpatients. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2004. 25(6);707-712.

References

[1] Quinn M.A.: "Screening for ovarian cancer". Aust. Fam. Physzcian., 2001, 30, 530.

[2] La Vecchia C.: "Epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a summary review". Eur. J. Cancer Prev., 2001, 10, 125.

[3] Sasaki H., Oda M., Ohmura M., Akiyama M., Liu C., Tsugane S. et al.:“Follow-up of women with simple ovarian cysts detected by transvaginal sonography in the Tokyo metropolitan area". Br. J Obstet. Gynaecol., 1999, 106 (5), 415.

[4] Christian J., Thomas H.: "Ovarian cancer chemotherapy". Cancer Treat. Rev., 2001, 27, 99.

[5] Buamah P.: "Benign conditions associated with raised serum CA-125 concentrations". J. Surg. Oneal., 2000, 75, 264.

[6] Engelen M.J., De Bruijn H.W., Hollema H., Tem Hoor K.A., Willemse P.H., Aalders J.G. et al.: "Serum CA 125, carcinoembryonic antigen, and CA 19-9 as tumor markers in borderline ovarian tumors". Gynecol. Oneal., 2000, 78 (1), 16.

[7] Meyer T., Rustin G.J.: "Role of tumour markers in monitonng epithelial ovarian cancer". Br. J. Cancer, 2000, 82, 1535.

[8] Rebischung C., Pautier P., Morice P., Lhomme C., Duvillard P.: "Alpha-fetoprotein production by a malignant mixed Mullerian tumor of the ovary··. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 77 (1), 203.

[9] Li T.C.,Hill A.S., Duncan S.B., Radstone D.J., Parsons M.A., Cooke T.D.: "Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary producing both oestrogen and progesterone. Case Report". Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1990, 97, 649.

[10] Menon U., Talaat A., Rosenthal A.N., Macdonald N.D., Jeyerajah A.R., Skatos SJ. et al.: "Performance of ultrasound as a second line test to serum CA 125 in ovarian cancer screening". Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2000, 107 (2), 165.

[11] Menon U., Jacobs I.J.: "Recent developments in ovarian cancer screening". Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 2000, 12, 39.

[12] Taylor K.J., Schwartz P.E.: "Cancer screening in a high-risk population: a clinical trial." Ultrasound Med. Biol., 2001, 27, 461.

[13] Franchesi S.: "Reproductive factors and cancer of the breast, ovary, and endometrium". Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol., 1989, 25, 1933.

[14] Eltabbakh G.H., Yadev P.R., Morgan A.: "Clinical picture of women with early stage ovarian cancer". Gynecol. Oncol., 1999, 75, 476.

[15] Finkler NJ.. Benacerraf B., Lavin P.T., Wojciechowski C., Knapp R.C.: "Comparison of serum CA125, clinical impression and ultrasound in the preoperative evaluation of ovarian masses" Ohstet. Gynecol., 1988, 72 (2), 659.

[16] Grazyna M.B., Malgorzata J., Andrzej M., Marek N., Marian S.: "Ovarian cysts in adolescent girls: report of 196 cases". Ginekol Pol., 1998, 69 (12), 1218.

[17] Jermy K., Luise C., Bourne T.: "The characterization of common ovarian cysts in premenopausal women". Ultrasound Ohstet Gynecol., 2001, 17, 140.

[18] Gerber B., Muller H., Kuiz T., Krouse A., Reimer T.: "Simple ovarian cysts in premenopausal patients". Int. J. Gynaecol Ohstet., 1997, 57 (1), 49.

[19] Pascual M.A., Hereter L., Tresserra F., Carreras 0., Ubeda A., Desceus S.:'Transvaginal sonographic appearance of functional ovarian cysts". Hum. Reprod., 1998, 12 (6), 503.

[20] Berlanda N., Ferrari M.M., Mezzopane R., Boero V., Grijuela B., Ferrazzi E., Pardi G.: "Impact of a multiparameter, ultrasoundbased triage on surgical management of adnexal masses". Ultrasound Ohstet. Gynecol., 2002, 20 (2), 181.

[21] Alexander-Sefre F., Menon U., Jacobs I.J.: "Ovanan cancer screening". Hosp. Med., 2002, 63, 210.

[22] Andersen E.S., Knudsen A., Rix P., Johansen B.: "Risk of maltgnancy index in the preoperative evaluation of patients with adnexal masses". Gynecol. Oncol., 2003, 90 (1), 109.

[23] Marchetti M., Zambon A., Lamaina V., Spadaro M., Marchioro S.: "Ultrasound as a possible screening method in ovarian cancer" Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2002, 23 (2), 123.

[24] Anderiesz C., Quinn M.A.: "Screening for ovarian cancer". Med. J. Aust., 2003, 178 (12), 655.

[25] Ugrinska A., Bombardieri E., Stokkel M.P., Crippa F., Pauwels E.K.: "Circnlating tumor markers and nuclear medicine imaging modalities: breast, prostate and ovarian cancer". Q. J. Nucl. Med., 2002, 46 (2), 88.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top