Article Data

  • Views 1068
  • Dowloads 107

Original Research

Open Access

Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: value of a morphologic scoring system

  • S. Topuz1,*,
  • H. Saygili1
  • S. Akhan1
  • E. Yavuz2
  • A. Turfanda1
  • S. Berkman1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

2Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo200502209 Vol.26,Issue 2,March 2005 pp.209-212

Published: 10 March 2005

*Corresponding Author(s): S. Topuz E-mail:

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the value of conventional gray-scale ultrasonography, based on a morphologic scoring system, in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign adnexal tumors.

Material and methods: A total of 58 adnexal masses in 51 patients were classified prospectively as suggestive of malignant or benign, on the basis of gray-scale ultrasonographic morphology. The results were correlated with histopathological diagnosis.

Results: Histopathology of 42 masses was found to be benign and 16 masses were found to be malignant. On gray-scale analysis 15 of 16 malignant masses were classified as suggestive of malignant and 37 of 42 benign masses were classified as suggestive of benign. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value are calculated as 93%, 88%, 75%, and 97%, respectively.

Conclusion: Prediction of malignancy using gray scale ultrasonograhy based on a morphological scoring system was reliable (NPV = 97%, PPV = 93%). However further investigations about the assessment of adnexal masses with ultrasonography are needed

Keywords

Adnexal masses; Gray-scale ultrasonography; Malignancy

Cite and Share

S. Topuz,H. Saygili,S. Akhan,E. Yavuz,A. Turfanda,S. Berkman. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: value of a morphologic scoring system. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2005. 26(2);209-212.

References

[1] Rodriquez M.: "The use of transvaginal sonography for evaluation of postmenopausal ovarian size and morphology". Am. J. Obstet Gynecol., 1988, 159, 810.

[2] VanNagel J., DePriest P., Puls L.: "Ovarian Cancer Screening in asymptomatic postmenopausal women by transvaginal sonography". Cancer, 1991, 68, 458.

[3] Adolf E.: "Sonography of the female pelvis with emphasis on ovarian tumors. Thesis for the department of obstetrics and gynecology. University of Lund, Sweden, 1989, 7.

[4] Granberg S., Norsom A., Wikland M.: "Tumors of the lower pelvis as imaged by vaginal sonography". Gynecol. Oneal., 1990, 37, 224.

[5] Jacobs I., Oran D., Fairbanks J.: "A risk of malignancy index incorparating CA 125 ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate diagnosis of ovarian cancer". Br. J. Obst et. Gynaecol., 1990, 97, 922.

[6] Sassone A.M., Timor-Tritsch I.E., Artner A.: "Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: Evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy". Obstet. Gynecol., 1991, 78, 70.

[7] Lerner J.P., Timor-Tritsch I.E., Federman A., Abramovich G.: "Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses with an improved, weighted scoring system". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1994, 170, 81.

[8] Fleischer A.C., Rodgers W.H., Keeple D.M. et al.: "Color Doppler sonography of ovarian masses: a multi-parameter analysis". J. Ultrasound Med., 1993, 12, 41.

[9] Jain K.: "Prospective evaluation of adnexal masses with endovaginal gray-scale duplex and color Doppler US: Correlation with pathological findings". Radiology, 1994, 191, 63.

[10] Timor-Tritsch I.E., Lerner J.P., Monteagudo A., Santos R.: "Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses by means of color flow directed measurements and morphological scoring system". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1993, 168, 909.

[11] Kurjak A., Zalud I., Alfirevic Z.: "Evaluation of adnexal masses with transvaginal color ultrasound". J. Ultrasound Med., 1991, 10, 295.

[12] Fleischer A.C., Rodgers W.H., Bao B.K. et al.: "Assessment of ovarian tumor vascularity with transvaginal color Doppler sonography". J. Ultrasound Med., 1991, 10, 563.

[13] Brown D.L., Frates M.C., Laing F.C. et al.: "Ovarian masses: Can benign and malignant lesions be differentiated with color and pulsed Doppler US?". Radiology, 1994, 190, 333.

[14] Timmerman D., Bourne T.H. et al.: "A comparison of methods for preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses: The development of a new logistic regression model". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1999, 181, 57.

[15] Stein S., Laifer Narin S., Johnson M.B., Roman L.: "Differentiation of benign and malign adnexal masses: Relative value of gray scale, color Doppler and spectral Doppler sonography". A.R.J., 1995, 164, 381.

[16] Rehn M., Lohmann K., Rewmper A.: "Transvaginal sonography of adnexal masses: Evaluation of B mode technique and Doppler sonography". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 175, 97.

[17] Roman L.D., Muderspach L.I., Stein S.M., Laifer-Narin S.: "Pelvic examination, tumor marker level, gray scale and Doppler sonography in prediction of pelvic cancer". Obstet. Gynecol., 1997, 89, 493.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top