Clinical results of a split sample liquid-based cytology (ThinPrep) study of 4,322 patients in a Turkish institution

Purpose: A prospective study was carried out to compare the efficacy of liquid-based cytology (ThinPrep) with the conventional Pap smear using a split-sample design in a Turkish university hospital outpatient gynecology clinic.

Methods: 4,322 consecutive patients were recruited for the study between 2002 and 2003. All the patients underwent conventional Pap tests followed by a ThinPrep test for screening of cervical cancer. The results were evaluated in terms of the Bethesda III classification. All the patients with abnormal tests underwent colposcopy and directed biopsy.

Results: While 2.3% of the specimens were unsatisfactory for evaluation in the conventional Pap test group, this rate was 1.7% for the ThinPrep group. Epithelial cell abnormalities were observed in 42 (1.0%) patients in the conventional Pap test group and in 36 (0.8%) patients in the ThinPrep group. ASCUS was observed in 26 patients in the conventional Pap test group whereas the ThinPrep group had 20 cases of ASCUS as the leading cause of abnormal cytology. Biopsy of these cases revealed CIN 1 in two CIN 2-3 in three and cervical/endometrial adenocarcinoma in three patients. The ThinPrep application led to diagnoses of one additional case of CIN 2-3 and one case of adenocarcinoma among the negative or unsatisfactory for evaluation categories of the conventional Pap test group.

Conclusion: Despite an adverse bias introduced by the split-sample study design, application of ThinPrep showed an improved rate of specimen adequacy and increased sensitivity for more significant cervical precursor lesions over the conventional Pap test.

ThinPrep; Liquid-based cytology; Pap test; Cervical cancer

[1] Papanicolaou G., Traut H.F.: "The diagnosis of uterine cancer by the vaginal smear". New York Commonwealth Fund., 1943.

[2] Fidler H.K., Boyes D.A., Worth A.J.: "Cervical cancer detection in British Columbia. A progress report". J. Obstet. Br. Comm., 1968, 75, 392.

[3] Benedet J.L., Anderson G.H.: "Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in British Columbia: A comprehensive program for detection, diagnosis and treatment". Gynecol. Oncol., 1981, 12, S280.

[4] Canadian Task Force Report: Can. Med. Assoc. J., 1976,114, 1003.

[5] Johannesson G., Geitsson G., Day N.: "The effect of mass screening in Iceland. 1965-1974, on the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer". Int. J. Cancer, 1978, 21, 418.

[6] Laara E., Day N.E., Hakama M.: "Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: Association with organized screening programmes". Lancet, 1987, 1, 1247.

[7] Yule R.: "False-negative cytology in a randomly selected group of women". Acta. Cytol., 1972, 16, 389.

[8] Spitzer M.: "Cervical screening adjuncts: recent advances". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1998, 179, 544.

[9] Fahey M.T., Irwig I., Macaskill P.: "Meta-analysis of Papanicolaou test accuracy". Am. J. Epidemiol., 1995, 141, 680.

[10] Nanda K., McCrory D.C., Myers E.R., Bastian L.A., Hasselblad V., Hickey J.D. et al.: "Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review". Ann. Intern. Med., 2000, 132, 810.

[11] Sawaya G.F., Grimes D.A.: "New Technologies in cervical cancer screening: a word of caution". Obstet. Gynecol., 1999, 94, 307.

[12] Bur M., Krowles K., Pekow P., Corral 0., Donovan J.: "Comparison of ThinPrep preparations with conventional cervicovaginal smears: practical considerations". Acta. Cytol., 1995, 39, 631.

[13] Wilbur D.C., BuBeshter B., Angel C., Atkinson K.M.: "Use of thin layer preperations for gynecologic smears with emphasis on cytopathology of high grade intraepithelial lesions and carcinomas". Diagn. Cytopathol., 1996, 14, 201.

[14] Sheets E.E., Constantine N.M., Dinisco S., Dean B., Cibas E.S.: "Colposcopically directed biopsies provide a basis for comparing the accuracy of ThinPrep and Papanicolaou smears". J. Gynecol. Technol., 1995, 1, 27.

[15] Wilbur D.C., Edmund C.S., Merritts S., James L.P., Berger B.M., Bonfiglio T.A.: "ThinPrep processor: clinical trends demonstrate an increased detection rate of abnormal cervical cytologic specimens". Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 1994, 101, 209.

[16] Agency for healthcare policy and research: Evidence report/technology assessment. Number 5. Evaluation of cervical cytology. Maryland. AHCPR Publication No. 99-EOIO, February 1999.

[17] Bishop J.W., Eigner S.H., Colgan T.J. et al.: "Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte Prep thin layers with matched conventional smeras. Including initial biopsy results". Acta. Cytol., 1998, 42, 189.

[18] Hutchinson M.L., Isenstein L.M., Goodman A. et al.: "Homogenous sampling accounts for the increased diagnostic accuracy using the ThinPrep processor accuracy using the ThinPrep processor". Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 1994, 101, 205.

[19] Awen C., Hathway S., Eddy W. et al.: "Efficacy of ThinPrep preparation of cervical smears: a 1000-case, investigator-sponsored study". Diagn. Cytopathol., 1994, 11, 33.

[20] Spitzer M., Johnson C.: "The Papanicolaou smear. In: Apgar B.S., Brotzman G.I., Spitzer M. (eds.). Colposcopy. Principles and practice". Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Company, 2002, 41.

[21] Cheung A.N.Y., Szeto E.F., Leung B.S. Y., Khoo U., Ng A.W.Y.: "Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears. A comparison study in an Asian screening population". Cancer Cytopathol., 2003, 99, 331.

[22] Coste J., Cochand-Priollet B., de Cremoux P., Le Gales C., Cartier I., Molinie V. et al.: "Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening". B.M.J., 2003, 326, 733.

[23] Roberts J.M., Gurley AM., Thurloe J.K., Bowditch R., Laverty C.R.: "Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test as an adjunct to the conventional Pap smear". Med. J. Aust., 1997, 167, 466.

[24] Lee K.R., Ashfaq R., Birdsong G.G., Corkill M.E., McIntosh K.M., Inhorn S.L.: "Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening". Obstet. Gynecol., 1997, 90, 278.

[25] Schorge J.O., Saboorian M.H., Hynan L., Ashfaq R.: "ThinPrep detection of cervical and endometrial adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study". Cancer. Cytopathol., 2002, 96, 338.

[26] Harkness C.B., Theofrastous J.P., Ibrahim S.N., Galvin S.L., Lawrence H.: "Papanicolaou and thin-layer cervical cytology with colposcopy biopsy control. A comparison". J. Reprod. Med., 2003, 48, 681.