Article Data

  • Views 213
  • Dowloads 100

Original Research

Open Access

Robotic surgery in gynecology

  • J.F. Magrina1,*,

1Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo20070277 Vol.28,Issue 2,March 2007 pp.77-82

Published: 10 March 2007

*Corresponding Author(s): J.F. Magrina E-mail:

Abstract

Robotic technology is nothing more than an enhancement along the continuum of laparoscopic technological advances and rep­resents only the beginning of numerous more forthcoming advances. It constitutes a major improvement in the efficiency, accuracy, ease, and comfort associated with the performance of laparoscopic operations.

Instrument articulation, downscaling of movements, absence of tremor, 3-D image, and comfort for the surgeon, assistant and scrub nurse are all new to the practice of laparoscopy. In our hands, robotic operative times for simple and radical hysterectomy are shorter than those obtained by conventional laparoscopy. Robotic technology is preferable to conventional laparoscopic instrumen­talion for the surgical treatment of gynecologic malignancies and most operations for benign disease of certain complexity such as hysterectomy myomectomy, and invasive pelvic endometriosis.

Keywords

Robotics; Gynecology; Hysterectomy

Cite and Share

J.F. Magrina. Robotic surgery in gynecology . European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2007. 28(2);77-82.

References

[1] Margossian H., Falcone T.: "Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and adnexal surgery". J. Laparoendosc Adv. Surg. Tech. A., 2001, 11,161.

[2] Margossian H., Garcia-Ruiz A., Falcone T., Goldberg J.M., Attaran M., Gagner M.: "Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical uterine horn anastomosis". Fertil. Steril., 1998, 70, 530.

[3] Falcone T., Goldberg J.M., Margossian H., Stevens L.: "Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study" Fertil. Steril., 2000, 73, 1040.

[4] Pra.sad S.M., Prasad S.M., Maniar H.S., Chu C., Schuessler R.B., Damiano R.J. Jr.: "Surgical robotics: impact of motion scaling on task per­formance". J. Am. Coll. Surg., 2004, 199, 863.

[5] Dakin G.F., Gagner M.: "Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems". Surg. Endosc., 2003, 17, 574.

[6] De Ugarte D.A., Etzioni D.A., Gracia C., Atkinson J.B.: "Robotic surgery and resident training". Surg. Endosc., 2003, 17, 960.

[7] Chang L., Satava R.M., Pellegrini C.A., Sinanan M.N.: "Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill". Surg. Endosc., 2003, 17, 1744.

[8] Sarle R., Tewari A., Shrivastava A., Peabody J., Menon M.: "Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills". J. Endourol., 2004, 18, 63.

[9] Kho R., Magtibay P., Magrina J.F.: "Robotic hysterectomy: morbidty and results". Submitted to Am J Obstet Gynecol., 2006.

[10] Yohannes P., Rotariu P., Pinto P., Smith A.D., Lee B.R.: "Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learn­ing curve?". Urology, 2002, 60, 39.

[11] Moorthy K., Munz Y., Dosis A., Hernandez J., Martin S.. Bello F., et al.: "Dexterity enhancement with robotic 、urgery". Surg. Endosc., 2004, 18, 790.

[12] Marescaux J., Leroy J.. Rubino F., Smith M., Vix M., Simone M., et al.: "Transcontinental robot-as、isted remote telesurgery: feassibility and potential applications". Ann. Surg., 2002, 235, 487.

[13] Anvari M., McKinley C., Stein H.: "Establishment of the world's first telerobotic remote surgical service: for provision of advanced laparo­scopic surgery in a rural community··. Ann. Surg., 2005, 241, 460.

[14] Janetschek G.. Bartsch G., Kavoussi L.R.:'Transcontinental interactive laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Europe". J. Urol., 1998, 160, 1413.

[15] Rodrigues Netto N. Jr., Mitre A.I., Lima S.Y., Fugita O.E., Lima M.L., Stoianovici D. et al.: "Telementoring between Brazil and the United States: initial experience". J. Endourol.. 2003, 17, 217.

[16] Schulam P.G., Docimo S.G., Saleh W., Breitenbach C., Moore R.G., Kavoussi L.:'Telesurgical mentoring. Initial clinical experience". Surg Endosc., 1997. I I, 1001.

[17] Diaz-Arrastia C., Jurnalov C., Gomez G., Townsend C. Jr.: "Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot". Surg Endosc., 2002, 16, 1271.

[18] Sundarm B.M., Kalidasan G., Hema! A.K.: "Robotic repair of vesicovaginal fistula: case series of five patients". Urology, 2006, 67, 970.

[19] Marchal F., Rauch P., Vandromme J., Laurent I., Lobontiu A., Ahcel B. et al.: "Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and oncologic pathologies: initial clinical experience with 30 patients". Surg. Endo.,·c.. 2005, 19, 826.

[20] Elliott D.S., Frank I., Dimarco D.S., Chow G.K.: "Gynecologic use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: Sacrocolpopexy for thetreatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse. Am. J. Surg:, 2004, 188, (suppl. 4A), 52S.

[21] Melamud _0., Eichel L., Turbow B., Shanberg _ A.: "Laparoscopic vesicovaginal fistula repair with robotic reconstruction". Urology, 2005, 65, 165.

[22] Magrina J.F.: "Laparoscopic surgery for gynecologic cancers". Clin. Obstet. Gynecol., 2000, 43, 619.

[23] Magrina J.F., Kho R., Magtibay P.: "Comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy". Unpublished data. 2006.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top