Cervical screening in Hungary: why does the “English model” work but the “Hungarian model” does not?

A comparison has been made between the English practice and the "Hungarian model" of cervical screening. In England, until 1986, extensive opportunistic screening was the practice, but - as it had no effect on cervical cancer mortality - afterwards, the screening policy was changed to be strictly in line with international recommendations. On the other hand, in Hungary, the "old practice" has been petrified: gynaecologists are the "gatekeepers", a "gynaecological examination completed with smear-taking for cytology" makes up the screening strategy. Although in the frame of a National Public Health Programme all the prerequisites for nationwide organised screening have been provided, and an up-to-date screening strategy declared, 20-times as many smears are taken and analysed outside as inside the programme, and the efforts have had no impact on cervical cancer mortality. This is because "old habits die hard". There is an urgent need to reconsider the screening strategy, and to reorganise the cervical screening practice in Hungary.

Opportunistic and organised screening for cervical cancer; Role of gynaecologists; Impact on mortality from cervical cancer

[1] Läära E., Day N., Hakama M.: “Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organised screening programmes”. Lancet, 1987, i, 1247.

[2] Hakama M., Miller A.B., Day N. (eds): “Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix”. IARC Sci. Publ. No. 76, WHO/IARC, Lyon, 1986.

[3] Council of the European Union: “Council recommendation of 2 December 2003 on cancer screening (2003/878/EC.)”. Official J. Eur. Union., 2003, 373, 34.

[4] Döbró´ssy L.: “A cytodiagnosztika hazai helyzetéró´l” (in Hungarian). Magyar Onkol. 1966, 10, 43.

[5] Döbró´ssy L.: “A rák cytológiai diagnózisának kérdései” (in Hungarian). Orvosképzés, 1968, 5, 377.

[6] Döbró´ssy L., Bodó M., Sugár J.: “A cytológiai tömegszo´rés helyzete és kilátásai” (in Hungarian). Orvosi Hetil., 1977, 118, 2121.

[7] Bodó M., Döbró´ssy L., Töttössy B., Péter Z.: “Megvalósulás útján a citológiai méhnyakszó´rés Magyarországon” (in Hungarian). Orvosképzés, 1982, 57, 266.

[8] Bodó M., Cseh I, Bó´sze P.: “Alarm-helyzet a cervixprogramban: kérdések és feladatok” (in Hungarian). Magyar Nó´orv. Lapja, 1991, 54, 373.

[9] Döbró´ssy L.: “Törekvések a rákszó´rés korszeró´sítésére Magyarországon: Modellprogramok Világbanki támogatással” (in Hungarian). Népegészségügy, 1999, 80, 23.

[10] Patnick J.: “Cervical cancer screening in England”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2000, 2205.

[11] National Audit Office: “Cervical and breast screening in England”. London, HMSO, 236, 1992.

[12] Quinn M., Babb P., Jones .J, Allen E.: “Effect of screening on the incidence and mortality from cancer of the cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics”. Br. Med. J., 1999, 318, 904.

[13] Sasieni P., Adams J., Cuzik J.: “Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories”. Brit. J. Cancer, 2003, 89, 88.

[14] Kovács A., Döbró´ssy L., Budai A., Boncz I., Cornides Á.: “A népegészségügyi méhnyakszó´rés helyzete Magyarországon 2006” (in Hungarian). Orv. Hetil., 2007, 148, 535.

[15] Papp Z. (ed.): “Szülészet-nó´gyógyászat tankönyve” (in Hungarian) . Budapest, Semmelweis Edit. Comp., 1999.