Article Data

  • Views 1451
  • Dowloads 126

Original Research

Open Access

Laparoscopic versus laparotomic approach to endometrial cancer

  • A.M. Perrone1,*,
  • B. Di Marcoberardino1
  • M. Rossi1
  • F. Pozzati2
  • A. Pellegrini1
  • M. Procaccini1
  • D. Santini1
  • P. De Iaco1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Oncologic Gynecology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital Bologna, Italy

2Department of Pathology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo201204376 Vol.33,Issue 4,July 2012 pp.376-381

Published: 10 July 2012

*Corresponding Author(s): A.M. Perrone E-mail: amperrone@libero.it

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our study was to compare the feasibility, morbidity, long-term safety, disease-free survival, and overall survival of the laparoscopic (LPS) approach to early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) compared to the traditional laparotomic approach. Methods: We reviewed retrospective data of patients who underwent primary surgery from 1997 to 2009. We recorded clinical parameters, surgical stage, histological type, operative and pen-operative complications, time to resumption of normal functions, conversion to laparotomy, overall survival, and disease-free survival. Results: LPS, did not increase operative risk and pen-operative complications even in obese and older women. The number of pelvic lymph and aortic nodes removed was similar for the two groups. One hundred and eight patients had a follow-up of 60 months. The two groups were similar for disease-free survival and overall survival. Conclusions: Laparoscopic approach to EC provides a reduction in postoperative complications and hospital stay compared to the laparotomic approach.

Keywords

Endometrial cancer; Laparoscopy; Laparotomy; Hysterectomy

Cite and Share

A.M. Perrone,B. Di Marcoberardino,M. Rossi,F. Pozzati,A. Pellegrini,M. Procaccini,D. Santini,P. De Iaco. Laparoscopic versus laparotomic approach to endometrial cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012. 33(4);376-381.

References

[1] Ries L.A., Wingo P.A., Miller D.S., Howe H.L., Weir H.K., Rosenberg H.M., Vernon S.W.: “The annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer”. Cancer, 2000, 88, 2398.

[2] Edwards B.K., Munstedt K., Grant P., Woenckhaus J., Roth G., Tinneberg H.R.: “Cancer of the endometrium: current aspects of diagnostics and treatment”. World J. Surg. Oncol., 2004, 2, 24.

[3] Brinton L.A., Sakoda L.C., Frederiksen K., Sherman M.E., Kiaer S.K., Graubard B.I. et al.: “Relationship of uterine and ovarian tumors to pre-existing chronic conditions”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 107, 487.

[4] Purdie D.M., Green A.C.: “Epidemiology of endometrial cancer”. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Gynaecol., 2001, 15, 341.

[5] Creasman W.T.: “Announcement: FIGO stages-1988 revisions”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1989, 35, 125.

[6] Barakat R.R., Lev G., Hummer A.J., Sonada Y., Chi D.S., Alektiar K.M. et al.: “Twelve-year experience in the management of endometrial cancer: a change in surgical and postoperative radiation approaches”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 105, 150.

[7] Walker J.L., Piedmonte M., Spirtos N.M., Eisenkop S.M., Schlaerth J.B., Mannel R.S. et al.: “Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (LAP 2)”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2009, 27, 5331.

[8] Gehrig P.A., Cantrell L.A., Shafer A., Abaid L.N., Mendivil A., Boggess J.F.: “What is the optimal minimally invasive procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 111, 41.

[9] Scribner D.R., Walker J.L., Johnson G.A., McMeekin S.D., Gold M.A., Mannel R.S.: “Surgicalmanagement of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2001, 83, 536.

[10] Magrina J.F.: “Outcomes of laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer”. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 2005, 17, 343.

[11] Mercuriali F., Inghilleri G., Biffi E., Colotti M.T., Vinci A., Scalamogna R., Zanella A.: “Erythropoietin treatment to increase autologous blood donation in patients with low basal hematocrit undergoing elective orthopedic surgery”. Clin. Investig., 1994, 72 (6 suppl.), S16.

[12] Perrone A.M., Casadio P., Formelli G., Levorato M., Ghi T., Costa S et al.: “Cervical and hysteroscopic injection for identification of sentinel lymph node in endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 111, 62.

[13] Eid I., Birch D.W., Sharma A.M., Sherman V., Karmali S.: “Complications associated with adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: a surgeon’s guides”. Can J. Surg., 2011, 54, 61.

[14] Nguyen N.T., Wolfe B.M.: “The physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum in the morbidly obese”. Ann. Surg., 2005, 241, 219.

[15] Pellegrino A., Signorelli M., Fruscio R., Villa A., Buda A., Beretta P. et al.: “Feasibility and morbidity of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with or without pelvic lymphadenectomy in obese women with Stage I endometrial cancer”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2009, 279, 655.

[16] Scribner D.R. Jr., Walker J.L., Johnson G.A., McMeekin S.D., Gold M.A., Mannel R.S.: “Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2001, 83, 563.

[17] Palomba S., Falbo A., Mocciaro R., Russo T., Zullo F.: “Laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 112, 415.

[18] Santi A., Kuhn A., Gyr T., Eberhard M., Johann S., Günthert A.R., Mueller M.D.: “Laparoscopy or laparotomy? A comparison of 240 patients with early-stage endometrial cancer”. Surg. Endosc., 2010, 24, 939.

[19] Zorlu C.G., Simsek T., Ari E.S.: “Laparoscopy or laparotomy for the management of endometrial cancer”. JSLS, 2005, 9, 442.

[20] Zullo F., Palomba S., Russo T., Falbo A., Costantino M., Tolino A. et al.: “A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches in women with early stage endometrial cancer: a focus on the quality of life”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2005, 193, 1344.

[21] Tozzi R., Malur S., Koehler C., Schneider A.: “Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in endometrial cancer:first analysis of survival of a randomized prospective study”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2005, 12, 130.

[22] Fram K.M.: “Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in Stage I endometrial cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2002, 12, 57.

[23] Malzoni M., Tinelli R., Cosentino F., Perone C., Rasile M., Iuzzolino D. et al.: “Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 112, 126.

[24] Eltabbakh G.H., Shamonki M.I., Moody J.M., Garafano L.L.: “Laparoscopy as the primary modality for the treatment of women with endometrial carcinoma”. Cancer, 2001, 91, 378.

[25] Gregor H., Sam C.E., Reinthaller A., Joura E.A.: “Port site metastases after laparoscopic lymph node staging of cervical carcinoma”. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc., 2001, 8, 591.

[26] Ramirez P.T., Wolf J.K., Levenback C.: “Laparoscopic port-site metastases: etiology and prevention”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2003, 91, 179.

[27] Martínez A., Querleu D., Leblanc E., Narducci F., Ferron G.: “Low incidence of port-site metastases after laparoscopic staging of uterine cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, 118, 145.

[28] Spirtos N.M., Schlaerth J.B., Gross G.M., Spirtos T.W., Schlaerth A.C., Ballon S.C.: “Cost and quality-of-life analyses of surgery for early endometrial cancer: laparotomy versus laparoscopy”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1996, 174, 1795.

[29] Mourits M.J.E., Bijen C.B., Arts H.J., Brugge H.G., Sijde R., Paulsen L. et al.: “Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial”. Lancet Oncol., 2010, 11, 763.

[30] Janda M., Gebski V., Brand A., Hogg R., Jobling T.W., Land R. et al.: “Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for Stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomised trial”. Lancet Oncol., 2010, 11, 772.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top