Article Data

  • Views 176
  • Dowloads 137

Original Research

Open Access

Incidence and clinical course of lymphoceles following pelvic sentinel lymph node removal in endometrial cancer

  • Dor Meiroff1,2
  • Michele Bollino1,2
  • Barbara Geppert1,2
  • Celine Lönnerfors1,2,*,

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital, 222 42 Lund, Sweden

2Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden

DOI: 10.22514/ejgo.2026.023 Vol.47,Issue 3,October 2026 pp.23-27

Submitted: 27 October 2025 Accepted: 02 December 2025

Published: 15 October 2026

*Corresponding Author(s): Celine Lönnerfors E-mail: celine.lonnerfors@med.lu.se

PDF (302.01 kB) View Full-text

Abstract

Background: To assess the incidence and clinical course of pelvic lymphoceles following removal of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) in endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: Between October 2014 and September 2021 consecutive women with a uterine confined EC deemed suitable for robotic surgery and detection of pelvic SLNs at a tertiary academic centre were screened for inclusion. A previously described SLN algorithm with detection of SLNs along parallel pelvic pathways, was adhered to. Follow-up, including a vaginal ultrasonography to detect pelvic lymphoceles, was scheduled every six months until two years post-surgery. The incidence, clinical course of pelvic lymphoceles, and any necessary intervention up to 12 and 24 months, were investigated. Results: A total of 449 women were included. After exclusions of women lost to, or having a remote hospital follow-up, 361 (at 12 months) and 276 (at 24 months) women were included. In ten women, a pelvic lymphocele was identified during the study period where a surgical fenestration was necessary in one patient, and one was treated with antibiotics. The remainder had either asymptomatic or spontaneously resolving lymphoceles. The development of a lymphocele was positively associated with increased Body Mass Index (BMI) (p = 0.005). However, neither adjuvant treatment, age, or the quantity of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) removed demonstrated a significant association (p = 0.756, p = 0.971 and p = 0.463 respectively). Conclusions: The overall risk of pelvic lymphocele development post SLN biopsy in women with EC was 2.7%. Eighty percent were either asymptomatic or had a spontaneously resolving lymphocele and the overall risk for intervention was 0.5%. Lymphocele development was associated with BMI but neither with the number of removed SLNs, age or adjuvant treatment. These results support the detection of SLNs in EC regardless of preoperative risk group. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03680833, retrospectively registered.

Keywords

Lymphocele; Sentinel lymph node; Endometrial cancer

Cite and Share

Dor Meiroff, Michele Bollino, Barbara Geppert, Celine Lönnerfors. Incidence and clinical course of lymphoceles following pelvic sentinel lymph node removal in endometrial cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2026; 47(3): 23-27. doi: 10.22514/ejgo.2026.023

References

[1] National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Uterine neoplasms. 2024. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/uterine.pdf (Accessed: 20 October 2025).
[2] Regionala cancercentrum i samverkan (RCC). RCC Swedish National Guidelines for endometrial cancer. 2025. Available at: https://kunskapsbanken.cancercentrum.se/diagnoser/livmoderkroppscancer/vardprogram (Accessed: 20 October 2025).
[3] Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Cibula D, Colombo N, Creutzberg CL, Ledermann J, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma: update 2025. The Lancet Oncology. 2025; 26: e423–e435.
[4] Geppert B, Lönnerfors C, Bollino M, Arechvo A, Persson J. A study on uterine lymphatic anatomy for standardization of pelvic sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2017; 145: 256–261.
[5] Persson J, Geppert B, Lonnerfors C, Bollino M, Masback A. Description of a reproducible anatomically based surgical algorithm for detection of pelvic sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2017; 147: 120–125.
[6] Jansen A, de Jong A, Hoogendam JP, Baeten IGT, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Zweemer RP, et al. Lymphocele following lymph node dissection in cervical and endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecologic Oncology. 2023; 170: 273–281.
[7] Cucinella G, Di Donna MC, Casarin J, Schivardi G, Multinu G, Borsellino L, et al. Lower limb lymphedema after surgical staging for endometrial cancer: current insights and future directions. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024; 63: 500–505.
[8] Leitao MM, Zhou QC, Gomez-Hidalgo NR. Patient-reported outcomes after surgery for endometrial carcinoma: prevalence of lower-extremity lymphedema after sentinel lymph node mapping versus lymphadenectomy. Gynecologic Oncology. 2020; 156: 147–153.
[9] Carter J, Huang HQ, Armer J, Carlson JW, Lockwood S, Nolte S, et al. GOG 244—The Lymphedema and Gynecologic cancer (LeG) study: the impact of lower-extremity lymphedema on quality of life, psychological adjustment, physical disability, and function. Gynecologic Oncology. 2021; 160: 244–251.
[10] Bollino M, Geppert B, Lönnerfors C, Måsbäck A, Kasselaki I, Persson J. Prevalence and size of pelvic sentinel lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer. European Journal of Cancer. 2024; 209: 114265.
[11] Mueller JJ, Pedra Nobre S, Braxton K, Alektiar KM, MM L Jr, Aghajanian C, et al. Incidence of pelvic lymph node metastasis using modern FIGO staging and sentinel lymph node mapping with ultrastaging in surgically staged patients with endometrioid and serous endometrial carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology. 2020; 157: 619–623.
[12] Terada S, Tanaka T, Murakami H, Tsuchihashi H, Toji A, Daimon A, et al. Lymphatic complications following sentinel node biopsy or pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12: 4540.
[13] Siegenthaler F, Imboden S, Büchi C, Christe L, Solass W, Saner F, et al. Added prognostic value of sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer to molecular subgroups. Gynecologic Oncology. 2025; 193: 12–19.
[14] Praiss AM, Dagher C, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Rios-Doria E, Abu-Rustum NR, et al. Lymph node metastases in endometrial carcinoma: a modern assessment in the era of sentinel lymph node mapping and molecular subtyping. Gynecologic Oncology. 2024; 191: 37–44.
[15] Geppert B, Lönnerfors C, Bollino M, Persson J. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer—feasibility, safety and lymphatic complications. Gynecologic Oncology. 2018; 148: 491–498.
[16] Diniz TP, Drizlionoks E, Faloppa CC, Menezes JN, Mantoan H, Gonçalves BT, et al. Impact of sentinel node mapping in decreasing the risk of lymphocele in endometrial cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2021; 28: 3293–3299.
[17] Goncalves BT, Dos Reis R, Ribeiro R, Moretti-Marques R, Schamme FK, Oliveira GS, et al. Does sentinel node mapping impact morbidity and quality of life in endometrial cancer? International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2023; 33: 1548–1556.
[18] Weinberger V, Cibula D, Zikan M. Lymphocele: prevalence and management in gynecological malignancies. Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy. 2014; 14: 307–317.
[19] de Jong A, Baeten IGT, Jansen A, Hoogendam JP, Jurgenliemk-Schulz IM, Zweemer RP, et al. Symptomatic lymphocele after robot-assisted pelvic lymphadenectomy as part of the primary surgical treatment for cervical and endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2024; 31: 243–249.e2.
[20] Zikan M, Fischerova D, Pinkavova I, Slama J, Weinberger V, Dusek L, et al. A prospective study examining the incidence of asymptomatic and symptomatic lymphoceles following lymphadenectomy in patients with gynecological cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2015; 137: 291–298.
[21] Bollino M, Geppert B, Lönnerfors C, Persson J. A selective anatomically based lymph node sampling can replace a side specific pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer with failed sentinel node mapping. European Journal of Cancer. 2024; 204: 114049.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top