Article Data

  • Views 639
  • Dowloads 126

Original Research

Open Access

Reproducibility of sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer by ICG fundic & cervical injection

  • Mikel Gorostidi1,2,3,*,
  • Ruben Ruiz1
  • Ibon Jaunarena1,2
  • Paloma Cobas1
  • Arantxa Lekuona1,2,3
  • Irene Diez-Itza1,2,3

1Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, 20014 San Sebastián, Spain

2BIODONOSTIA Health Research Institute, 20014 San Sebastián, Spain

3Department of Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Basque Country UPV/EHU, 20018 San Sebastián, Spain

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo4206185 Vol.42,Issue 6,December 2021 pp.1285-1290

Submitted: 22 June 2021 Accepted: 16 August 2021

Published: 15 December 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Mikel Gorostidi E-mail: mgorostidi@sego.es

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to study the reproducibility of the dual injection technique of IndoCyanine Green (ICG) in the cervix and fundus in endometrial cancer. Methods: Between June 2014, and December 2019, 278 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer at our institution. In all cases, under a prospective cohort study, we performed Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) biopsy with dual cervical and fundal ICG injection. Lymphadenectomy was also performed if intermediate or high-risk criteria were present. All cases were performed independently by three surgeons, with the same protocol and system, and their results were compared. Results: Global, aortic, pelvic and bilateral pelvic detection rates (DRs) were 93.45%, 67.27%, 90.18% and 67.64%. There were no significant differences for DRs between the three surgeons. The probability of finding a positive SLN was 8.8% (SD 2.8), 21% (SD 4.1) and 12% (SD 3.3), respectively, with a significant chi-squared difference (p = 0.041), which was statistically associated with preoperative risk factors (p < 0.001) and not to a surgeon’s factor in a multivariate logistic regression. Conclusions: The SLN biopsy with both cervical and fundal ICG injection offers good overall detection rates and improved mapping of the aortic area and can be reproduced with similar results among different surgeons.

Keywords

Sentinel node; Endometrial cancer; Indocyanine green; Lymphadenectomy; Reproducibility; Aortic sentinel node

Cite and Share

Mikel Gorostidi,Ruben Ruiz,Ibon Jaunarena,Paloma Cobas, Arantxa Lekuona, Irene Diez-Itza. Reproducibility of sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer by ICG fundic & cervical injection. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2021. 42(6);1285-1290.

References

[1] Khoury-Collado F, St Clair C, Abu-Rustum NR. Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer: an Update. The Oncologist. 2016; 21: 461–466.

[2] Rossi EC, Kowalski LD, Scalici J, Cantrell L, Schuler K, Hanna RK, et al. A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study. The Lancet Oncology. 2017; 18: 384–392.

[3] Amant F, Trum H. Sentinel-lymph-node mapping in endometrial cancer: routine practice? The Lancet Oncology. 2017; 18: 281– 282.

[4] Abu-Rustum NR. The increasing credibility of sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncol- ogy. 2013; 20: 353–354.

[5] Kim CH, Soslow RA, Park KJ, Barber EL, Khoury-Collado F, Bar- lin JN, et al. Pathologic ultrastaging improves micrometastasis detection in sentinel lymph nodes during endometrial cancer staging. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2013; 23: 964–970.

[6] Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 2020; 31: 12–39.

[7] Khoury-Collado F, Glaser GE, Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Levine DA, Chi DS, et al. Improving sentinel lymph node detection rates in endometrial cancer: how many cases are needed? Gynecologic Oncology. 2009; 115: 453–455.

[8] Barlin JN, Khoury-Collado F, Kim CH, Leitao MM, Chi DS, Son- oda Y, et al. The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: beyond removal of blue nodes. Gynecologic Oncology. 2012; 125: 531–535.

[9] Kim S, Ryu KJ, Min KJ, Lee S, Jung US, Hong JH, et al. Learning curve for sentinel lymph node mapping in gynecologic malignancies. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2020; 121: 599–604.

[10] Tucker K, Staley S, Gehrig PA, Soper JT, Boggess JF, Ivanova A, et al. Defining the learning curve for successful staging with sentinel lymph node biopsy for endometrial cancer among surgeons at an academic institution. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 2020; 30: 346–351.

[11] Ruiz R, Gorostidi M, Jaunarena I, Goiri C, Aguerre J, Lekuona A. Sentinel Node Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer with Dual Cervical and Fundal Indocyanine Green Injection. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 2018; 28: 139–144.

[12] Eoh KJ, Lee YJ, Kim H, Lee J, Nam EJ, Kim S, et al. Two-step sentinel lymph node mapping strategy in endometrial cancer staging using fluorescent imaging: a novel sentinel lymph node tracer in- jection procedure. Surgical Oncology. 2018; 27: 514–519.

[13] Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, Bosse T, González-Martín A, Ledermann J, et al. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up. In- ternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2016; 26: 2–30.

[14] Persson J, Geppert B, Lönnerfors C, Bollino M, Måsbäck A. Description of a reproducible anatomically based surgical algorithm for detection of pelvic sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2017; 147: 120–125.

[15] Martinelli F, Ditto A, Signorelli M, Bogani G, Chiappa V, Lorusso D, et al. Sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer following Hysteroscopic injection of tracers: a single center evaluation over 200 cases. Gynecologic Oncology. 2017; 146: 525–530.

[16] Ditto A, Casarin J, Pinelli C, Perrone AM, Scollo P, Martinelli F, et al. Hysteroscopic versus cervical injection for sentinel node detec- tion in endometrial cancer: a multicenter prospective randomised controlled trial from the Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer (MITO) study group. European Journal of Cancer. 2020; 140: 1–10.

[17] Kataoka F, Susumu N, Yamagami W, Kuwahata M, Takigawa A, Nomura H, et al. The importance of para-aortic lymph nodes in sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer by using hysteroscopic radio-isotope tracer injection combined with subserosal dye injection: Prospective study. Gynecologic Oncology. 2016; 140: 400–404.

[18] Holub Z, Jabor A, Kliment L. Comparison of two procedures for sentinel lymph node detection in patients with endometrial cancer: a pilot study. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2002; 23: 53–57.

[19] Kang S, Yoo HJ, Hwang JH, Lim M, Seo S, Park S. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: meta-analysis of 26 studies. Gynecologic Oncology. 2011; 123: 522–527.

[20] How JA, O’Farrell P, Amajoud Z, Lau S, Salvador S, How E, et al. Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecol- ogy. 2018; 70: 194–214.

[21] Capozzi VA, Valentina C, Giulio S, Alessandra C, Giulia G, Giulia A, et al. Sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer: Tips and tricks to improve bilateral detection rate. the sentitricks study, a monocentric experience. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gy- necology. 2021; 60: 31–35.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top