Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Associations between tumor diameter and prognostic variables of epithelial ovarian cancer
1Department of Gynecology, Japan
2Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratory,Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
*Corresponding Author(s): T. Nakanishi E-mail:
Purpose: Associations of tumor diameter in epithelial ovarian cancer with clinical and pathological prognostic variables were investigated.
Methods: The clinical and pathological records of 233 patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer and treated at Aichi Cancer Center were studied.
Results: Tumor diameters of 44 patients (18.9%) were < 5 cm, 90 (38.6%) were 5-10 cm, and 99 (42.5%) were > 10 cm. While 90.9% (40/44) of < 5 cm tumors presented with FIGO stage III-IV, 40.4% (40/99) of > 10 cm tumors were advanced. Intra-abdominal disease was also significantly associated with tumor diameter, although differences among lymph-node status were not significant. The incidence of serous and endometrioid adenocarcinoma in < 5 cm tumors were 75.0% (33/44) and 11.4% (5/44), respectively, while those of > 10 cm tumor were 32.3% (32/99) and 17.2% (17/99). Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor diameter was not an independent prognostic variable.
Conclusion: Tumor diameter of ovarian cancer is associated closely with histological subtypes and stage of disease, especially intra-abdominal disease.
Ovarian cancer; Tumor diameter
T. Nakanishi,A. Nawa,Y. Niwa,S. Nakamura,K. Kuzuya. Associations between tumor diameter and prognostic variables of epithelial ovarian cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2003. 24(1);45-47.
[1] Hoskins W. J., McGuire W. P., Brady M. F., Homesley H. D., Creasman W. T., Berman M. et al.: "The effect of diameter of largest residual disease on survival after primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with suboptimal residual epithelial ovarian carcinoma". Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1994, 170, 974.
[2] Makar A. P., Baekelandt M., Trope C. G., Kristensen G. B.: "The prognostic significance of residual disease, FIGO substage, tumor histology, and grade in patients with FIGO stage III ovarian cancer". Gynecol. Oncol., 1995, 55, 175.
[3] Stratton J. F., Pharoah P., Tidy J. A., Paterson M. E.: "An analysis of ovarian tumor diameter and survival". Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer , 2000, 10, 449.
[4] Jacobs I. J., Skates S. J., MacDonald N., Menon U., Rosenthal A N., Davies A. P. et al.: "Screening for ovarian cancer: a pilot randomised controlled trial". Lancet, 1999, 353, 1207.
[5] Klaric P., Zovak M., Brezovec-Cvetnic B., Pirkic A., Tuckar N.: "Giant mucinous malignant ovarian tumor". Zentralhl. Gynakol., 1999, 121, 298.
[6] Feuer G. A., Shevchuk M., Calanog A.: "Normal-sized ovary carcinoma syndrome". Ohstet. Gynecol., 1989, 73, 789.
[7] Cannistra S. A.: "Cancer of the ovary". New Engl. J. Med., 1993, 329, 1550.
[8] Omura G. A., Brady M. F., Homesley H. D., Yordan E., Major F J., Buchsbaum H.J. et al.: "Long-term follow-up and prognostic factor analysis in advanced ovarian carcinoma: the Gynecologic Oncology Group experience". J. Clin. Oneal., 1991, 9, 1138.
Web of Science (WOS) (On Hold)
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition
Google Scholar
JournalSeek
Top