Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Screening for cervical cancer - an evidence-based approach
1Department of Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah-7Ykva, Israel
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah-Tikva, Israel
3Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
*Corresponding Author(s): A. Fraser E-mail:
Introduction: The Papanicolau (Pap) smear is widely accepted by both the public and health authorities as a useful tool for detection of cervical cancer and its precursors. In Israel only opportunistic screening exists and still the incidence of invasive cervical cancer is among the lowest in the world.
Objectives: To examine the existing evidence for the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening by Pap smears; to apply the findings to Israeli data, and to assess the implications for the current cervical cancer screening policy.
Methods: Search of Medline (1966-June 2003) and the Cochrane Library for relevant systematic reviews, controlled trials and cohort studies.
Results: There have been no trials of screening for cervical cancer and its precursors and therefore, no direct evidence that screening improves outcomes. A single retrospective cohort study estimated the age-adjusted RR for invasive cervical cancer in women with at least one Pap smear, whether normal or abnormal, compared to women with no smear at 0.4 (95% CI 0.2-0.9). In Israel some 27,800 (range: 20,800-167,000) women need to be screened in order to prevent one case of cervical cancer. The cost of preventing a single case of invasive cervical is approximately 1.288 million NIS (range: 1.643-13.193 million NIS).
Conclusions: An evidence-based approach to the question of the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening using Pap smears has yielded weak evidence. Based on this weak evidence and rough estimations of the effectiveness and cost of mass screening for cervical cancer in Israel, we conclude that the current policy should be maintained.
Cervical cancer; Screening; Pap; Evidence-based medicine; Number needed to screen (NNS)
A. Fraser,S. Hellmann,L. Leibovici,H. Levavi. Screening for cervical cancer - an evidence-based approach. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2005. 26(4);372-375.
[1] Linos A., Riza E.: "Comparisons of cervi omparisons cervical cancer screening programmes in the European Union". Eur. J. Cancer, 2000, 36, 2260.
[2] Women's Health in Israel 1999-2000: a data book, 2000, 79.
[3] Israel National Cancer Registry. http://www.health.gov.il/icr
[4] Menczer J.: "Cervical cancer and cytologic screening in Israel". Harefua, 1981, 101, 124.
[SJ Bornstein J., Abramovitch H.: "The importance of cervical cancer mass screening in Israel". Heblew., 1992, 122, 776.
[6] Ben-Shoshan A., Antebi A.: "Mass screening for early detection of cervical cancer in Israel, the need for renewed debate". Heblew, 2000, 139, 217.
[7] Rychetnik L., Frommer M., Hawe P., Shiell A.: "Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health". J. Epidemiol. Community Health, 2002, 56, 119.
[8] http://www.cochrane.dk/nrsmg/docs/chap2.pdf.
[9] Szklo M., Nieto F.J.: "Epidemiology - Beyond the Basics". Maryland: Aspen Publishers, Inc. 2000, 24.
[10] Stenkvist B., Bergstrom R., Eklund G., Fox C.H.: "Papanicolaou smear screening and cervical cancer: what can you expect?". JAMA, 1984, 252, 1423.
[11] http://www.health.gov.il.
[12] La Vecchia C., Decarli A., Gallus G.: "Epidemiological data on cervical carcinoma relevant to cytopathology". Appl. Pathol., 1987, 5, 25.
[13] USPSTF: "Screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale". Am. Fam. P hysician., 2003, 67, 1759.
[14] Ball C., Madden J.E.: "Upd ate on cervical cancer screening: current diagnostic and evidence-based management protocols". Postgrad. Med., 2003, 113, 59.
[15] Sadan O., Schejter E., Ginath S., Bachar R., Boaz M., Menczer J., Glezennan M.: "Premalignant lesions of the uterine cervix in a large cohort of Israeli Jewish women". Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Online first. http://www.springerlink.com.
Top