Article Data

  • Views 231
  • Dowloads 138

Original Research

Open Access

Wire localisation biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions: reasons for unsuccessful excision

  • E. Kouskos1,*,
  • G.P.H. Gui2
  • D. Mantas3
  • K. Revenas3
  • N. Rallis1
  • Z. Antonopoulou3
  • E. Lampadariou3
  • H. Gogas3
  • C. Markopoulos3

1Surgical Department, Vostanio General Hospital of Mytilene, Lesvos Island

2Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, NHS Trust, London

3Breast Unit, 2"d Surgical Department, Medical School of Athens, Laiko General Hospital of Athens, Greece

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo200603262 Vol.27,Issue 3,May 2006 pp.262-266

Published: 10 May 2006

*Corresponding Author(s): E. Kouskos E-mail:

Abstract

Surgical excision following needle-wire localization of nonpalpable, mammographically detected breast lesions is a very valuable diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. No further treatment is usually required after establishing an accurate histological benign diagnosis of indeterminate lesions on preoperative assessment. On the other hand, ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) and early invasive cancer, properly excised, may sometimes require further management depending on specific histologic findings. An uncommon problem of this procedure is the failure to identify, localize or excise the breast lesion. In this review article, factors that contribute to the failed needle localization procedure are presented.

Keywords

Mammography; Breast cancer; Wire localisation; Breast biopsy; Breast screening

Cite and Share

E. Kouskos,G.P.H. Gui,D. Mantas,K. Revenas,N. Rallis,Z. Antonopoulou,E. Lampadariou,H. Gogas,C. Markopoulos. Wire localisation biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions: reasons for unsuccessful excision. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2006. 27(3);262-266.

References

[1] Tabar L., Vitak B., Chen H.H. et al.: "The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up". Radio!. Clin. North. Am., 2000, 38, 625.

[2] Hasselgren P.O., Hummel R.P., Fieler M.A.: "Breast biopsy with needle localisation: influence of age and mammographic feature on the rate of malignancy in 350 nonpalpable breast lesions" Surgery, 1991, 110, 623.

[3] American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 3rd ed. American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia, 1998.

[4] Pijnappel R.M., Peeters P.H., van der Donk M. et al.: "Diagnostic strategies in non-palpable breast lesions". Eur. J. Cancer, 2002, 38, 550.

[5] Coombs NJ., Laddie J.R., Royle G.T. et al.: "Improving the sensitivity of stereotactic core biopsy to diagnose ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a mathematical model". Br. J. Radiol., 2001, 74, 123.

[6] Apesteguia L., Mellado M.. Saenz J. et al.: "Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy on digital stereotactic table of nonpalpable lesions non-recognisable by ultrasonography". Eur. Radio/., 2002, 12, 638.

[7] Sheth D., Wesen C.A., Schroder D. et al.: "The advanced breast biopsy instrumentation (ABBI) experience at a community hospital". Am. Surg., 1999, 65, 726.

[8] Hawasli A., Zonca S., Watt C. et al.: "Should needle localisation breast biopsy give way to the new technology; the advanced breast biopsy instrumentation". Am. Surg., 2000, 66, 648.

[9] W hitten T.M., Wallace T.W., Bird R.E. et al.: "Image-guided core biopsy has advantages over needle localisation biopsy for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer". Am. Surg., 1997, 63, 1072.

[10] Verkooijen H.M., Peeters P.H., Buskens E. et al.: "Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: a meta-analysis". Br. J. Cancer, 2000, 82, 1017.

[11] Buijs-van der Woude T., Verkooijen H.M. et al.: "The COBRA study group (Core Biopsy Radiological localisation). Cost comparison between stereotactic large-core-needle biopsy versus surgical excision biopsy in The Netherlands". Eur. J. Cancer, 2001, 37, 1736.

[12] Dodd G.D., Greening R.R., Wallace S.: "The radiological diagnosis of cancer". In: Nealon T.F. Jr. (ed.); Management of the Patient with Cancer. 1965, Philadelphia, Saunders Publishers Inc., 88.

[13] Symmonds R.E., Roberts J.W.: "Management of nonpalpable breast abnormalities". Ann. Surg., 1987,2 05,5 20.

[14] Besic N., Zgajnar J., Hocevar M. et al.: "Breast biopsy with the wire localisation: factors influencing complete excision of nonpalpable carcinoma". Eur. Radial., 2002, 12, 2684.

[15] Markopoulos C., Kakisis J., Kouskos E. et al.: "Management of nonpalpable, mammographically detectable breast lesions". World J. Surg., 1999, 23, 434.

[16] Jackman R.J., Marzoni P.A.: "Needle-localized breast biopsy· Why do we fail?". Radiology, 1997, 204, 677.

[17] Papa M.Z., Klein E., Davidson B. et al.: "The effect of anesthesia type on needle localisation breast biopsy: another point of view" Am. J. Surg., 1996, 171, 242.

[18] Weyant M., Caroccio A., Tartter P.I . et al.: "Determinants of success with spot localisation biopsy of the breast". Am. Coll. Surg., 1995, 181, 521.

[19] Gisvolt J.J., Goellner J.R., Grant C.S. et al.: "Breast b10psy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques". A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol., 1994, 162, 815.

[20] Hastrich D.J., Dunn J.M., Amstrong J.S. et al.: "Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of fine-wire localisation biopsy for impalpable breast cancer". Br. J. Surg., 1992, 79, 1038.

[21] Stein M.A., Karlan M.: "Immediate postoperative mammogram for failed surgical excision of breast lesions". Radiology, 1991, 180, 19.

[22] Aitken R.J., MacDonald H.L., Kirkpatrick A.E. et al.: "Outcome of surgery of non-palpable mammographic abnormalities". Br. J. Surg., 1990, 77, 673.

[23] Montrey J.S., Levy J.A., Brenner R.J.: "Wire fragments after needle localisation". A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol., 1996, 167, 1267.

[24] Sickles E.A.: "Practical solutions to common mammographic problems: tailoring the examination". A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol., 1988, 151, 31.

[25] Vuorela A.L., Ahonen A.: "Preoperative stereotactic hookwire localisation of nonpalpable breast lesions with and without the use of a further stereotactic check film". Anticancer Res., 2000, 20, 1277.

[26] Vuorela A.L., Kettunen S., Punto L.: "Preoperative hook-wire localisation of nonpalpable breast lesions by use of standard and stereotactic technique". Anticancer Res., 1993, 13, 1873.

[27] Tinnemans J.G.M., Wobbes T., Hendriks J.H.C.L. et al.: "Localisation and excision of nonpalpable breast lesions: a surgical evaluation of three methods". Arch. Surg., I 987, 122, 802.

[28] Alexander H.R., Candela F.C., Dershaw D.D. et al.: "Needlelocalized mammographic lesions". Arch. Surg., 1990, 125, 1441.

[29] Rissanen T.J., Makarainen H.P., Mattila S.I. et al.: "Wire localized biopsy of breast lesions: a review of 425 cases found in screening or clinical mammography". Clin. Radio/., 1993, 47, 14.

[30] Husien A.M.A.: "Stereotactic localisation mammography: interpreting the check film". Clin. Radio!., 1992, 45, 387.

[31] Walker T.M., Ross H.B.: "Localisation of impalpable breast lesions using the Hawkins needle". Br. J. Radio/., 1992, 65, 929-931.

[32] Kopans D.B., Waitzkin E.D., Linetsky L. et al.: "Localisation of breast lesion identified on only one mammographic view". A.J.R Am. J. Roentgenol., 1987, 149, 39.

[33] Homer M.J.: "Preoperative needle localisation of lesions in the lower half of the breast: needle entry from below". A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol., 1987, 149, 43.

[34] Gallagher W.J., Cardenosa G., Rubens J.R. et al.: "Minimalvolume excision of nonpalpable breast lesions". A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol., 1989, 153, 957.

[35] Parker S.J., Wheaton M., Wallis M.G., Harries S.A.: "Why should diagnostic benign breast biopsies weight less than twenty grams?" Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl., 2001, 83, 113.

[36] Kaelin C.M., Smith T.J., Homer M.J. et al.: "Safety, accuracy, and diagnostic yield of needle localisation biopsy of the breast performed under local anesthesia". J. Am. Coll. Surg., 1994, 179, 267.

[37] Al-Sobhi S.S., Helvie M.A., Pass H.A., Chang A.E.: "Extent of lumpectomy for breast cancer after diagnosis by stereotactic core versus wire localisation biopsy". Ann. Surg. Oncol., 1999, 6, 330.

[38] Hasselgren P.O., Hummel R.P., Georgian-Smith D. et al.: "Breast biopsy with needle localisation: accuracy of specimen X-ray and management of missed lesions". Surgery, 1993, 114, 836.

[39] White R.R., Halperin T.J., Olson J.A. Jr. et al.: "Impact of core needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities". Ann. Surg., 2001, 233, 769.

[40] Liberman L., Cohen M.A., Dershaw D.D. et al.: "Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions An indication for surgical biopsy". A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol., 1995, 164, 1111.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top