Does shifting a physician payment system shift physician priorities? A multi-site evaluation of an alternative payment plan (APP) for gynecologic oncologists in Ontario

Objective: The objective of this study was to attempt to understand how changing the mode of reimbursement alters physician behavior from the physician's perspective.

Method: Individual interviews were conducted with 14 Ontario gynecologic oncologists. Each interview was analyzed using grounded theory.

Results: The move to an alternative payment plan (APP) significantly shifted physician clinical and personal priorities. This resulted in improvements in recruitment and retention. A model was developed to explain the link between the shift in the payment system and physician perceptions of their behavior. The model is comprised of two themes: (a) need for change: site similarities and differences, (b) effects of change: shifting priorities and time management. Even when the same compensation package was offered to four sites, the interpretations and motivations differed from site to site. We identified two types of situations: sites that were operating in 'survival mode' and those that were 'meeting core clinical and academic requirements'. They experienced the APP very differently.

Conclusion: This study presents a model that depicts how and why a funding shift has variable effects on physician behaviors, depending on the individual physician, site, and multi-site perspectives. It offers one of the few qualitative evaluations of a funding change.

Alternative Payment Plan; Gynecologic oncologist

[1] Martin S.: "Is everyone as tired as I am?". CMAJ, 1999, 161, 1020.

[2] Hibbard J.H., Greenlick M.R., Kunkel L.E., Capizzi J.: "Mode of payment, practice characteristics and physician support for patient self care". Am. J. Prev. Med., 2001, 20, 118.

[3] Miller W., Crabtree B.F., Crabtree B.F.: "Primary care research: A multi-method typology and qualitative road map". In: Crabtree B.F., Miller W.L. (eds.), Doing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1992, 17.

[4] Yin R.: "Case study research: design and methods". Anonymous Case Study Research. 2"'edition, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1994.

[5] Giacomini M.K., Cook D.J.: "Users'guides to the medical literature: XXlll. Qualitative research in health care B. W hat are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? EvidenceBased Medicine Working Group". JAMA, 2000, 284, 478.

[6] Strauss A., Strauss A., Corbin (eds.). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, Sage, 1990.

[7] Zierler B.K., Marcus-Smith M.S., Cheadle A., Conrad D.A., Kirz H.L., Madden C. et al.: "Effect of compensation method on behavior of primary care physicians in managed care organizations: evi dence from interviews with physicians and medical leaders in Washington State". Am. J. Manag. Care, 1998, 4, 209.

[8] Giacommini M., Lomas J., Hurley J.. Bhatia V., Goldsmith L.: "The devilis in the details: some conclusions about how funding changes translate to financial incentives in the Canadian health system". McMaster University Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, 1996, 96.

[9] Cosby J., Anderson M.: "Changing management to adapt to a new compensation culture: Implementing an alternative funding plan at Queen's F aculty of Medicine". Kingston, Ontario. Queen's health Policy Research Unit Working Paper Series, Queen's University 1997.