Article Data

  • Views 232
  • Dowloads 125

Original Research

Open Access

Urban-rural differences in gynaecological cancer occurrence in a central region of Italy: 1978-1982 and 1998-2002

  • L. Minelli1
  • F. Stracci1
  • T. Cassetti1
  • A. Canosa1
  • M. Scheibel1
  • I.E. Sapia1
  • C. Romagnoli1
  • F. La Rosa1,*,

1Umbrian Population Cancer Registry, Department of Medical-Surgical Specialties and Public Health, Public Health Section, University of Perugia, Italy

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo200706468 Vol.28,Issue 6,November 2007 pp.468-472

Published: 10 November 2007

*Corresponding Author(s): F. La Rosa E-mail:

Abstract

Differences in gynaecological cancer incidence and mortality in the urban and rural areas of the Umbria region (central Italy) were investigated. All women with primary invasive breast cancers, uterine cervix and uterine corpus, and ovarian cancers diagnosed during the periods 1978-1982 and 1998-2002 were identified and analysed according to place of residence (either urban or rural). Mortality data were supplied by the National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) for the period 1978 to 1982, whereas for the 1994-2002 period they were supplied by the Regional Nominative Causes of Death Registry (ReNCaM). Incident cases considered were taken from an ad hoc survey for the first period and from the Umbrian Population Cancer Registry database for the second one. For each site the age-adjusted incidence (AAIR) and mortality (AADR) rates were calculated. The expected number of rural cases was obtained from indirect standardisation with urban incidence and mortality rates of several sites. The significance of the observed expected ratios (SIRs for incidence and SMRs for mortality) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were based on the Poisson distribution. Urbanisation levels were established following the classification of the Italian Institute of Statistics. For all sites, excluding the ovary during the most recent period, the SIR relative to rural areas was below 1, but the rates were statistically significant only for breast cancer in both periods (SIR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88 and SIR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.88, respectively) and for cervix uteri in the first period (SIR 0.77, 95% CI 0.59-0.94). The lower breast cancer incidence in the rural area could also be due to lesser compliance with screening procedures which, up until 2002, were not provided in the form of mass-screenings throughout the region by the Regional Health Department. These results underscore the need for continued efforts to provide preventive health services to medically underserved women throughout Umbria, including rural communities. Underutilisation of preventive healthcare services may result in failure to identify healthcare problems that might be successfully managed with medication or lifestyle changes, as well as missed opportunities to prevent potentially life-threatening diseases.

Keywords

Urban-rural differences·; Gynaecological cancer incidence; Gynaecological cancer mortality

Cite and Share

L. Minelli,F. Stracci,T. Cassetti,A. Canosa,M. Scheibel,I.E. Sapia,C. Romagnoli,F. La Rosa. Urban-rural differences in gynaecological cancer occurrence in a central region of Italy: 1978-1982 and 1998-2002. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2007. 28(6);468-472.

References

[1] Mastrandrea V., La Rosa F., Pannelli F., Cresci A.: "Malignant neoplasm mortality in different zones of a central Italian Region: the mountains, hills and coast of the Marche". Zbl. Bakt. Hyg. Abt. Orig. B., 1977, 165, 269.

[2] Federici N., De Samo Prignano A., Pasquali P., Cariani G., Natale M.: "Urban/rural differences in mortality, 1959-1970". World Health Stat. Rep., 1976, 29, 249.

[3] Duelberg S.I.: "Preventive health behaviour among black and white women in urban and rural areas". Soc. Sci. Med., 1992, 34, 191.

[4] Schouten L.J., Meijer H., Huveneers J.A., Kiemmeney L.A.: "Urban-rural differences in cancer incidence in The Netherlands 1989-1991". Jnt. J. Epidemiol., 1996, 25, 729.

[5] Faulkner L.A., Schauffler H.H.: "The effect of health msurance coverage on the appropriate use of recommended clinical preventive services". Am. J. Prev. Med., 1997, 13, 453.

[6] Solanki G., Scauffler H.H.: "Cost-sharing and the utilization of clinical preventive services". Am. J. Prev. Med., 1999, 17, 127.

[7] Larson S., Correa-de-Araujo R.: "Preventive Health Examinations: a comparison along the rural-urban continuum". Women's Health Issues, 2006, 16, 80.

[8] Liff J., Chow W., Greenberg R.: "Rural-urban differences in stage at diagnosis: possible relationship to cancer screening". Cancer, 1991, 67, 1454.

[9] Parikh-Patel A., Bates J.H., Campleman S.: "Colorectal cancer stage at diagnosis by socioeconomic and urban/rural status in California, 1988-2000". Cancer, 2006, 197, 1189.

[10] Campbell M.C., Elliot A.M., Sharp L., Ritchie L.D., Cassidy J., Little J.: "Rural and urban differences in stage at diagnosis of colorectal and lung cancers". Br. J. Cancer., 2001, 84, 910.

[11] Calle E.E., Flanders W.D., Thun M.J., Martin L.M.: "Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women". Am. J. Public. Health., 1993, 83, 53.

[12] La Rosa F., Canosa A., Petrinelli A.M., Stracci F., Cassetti T., Romagnoli C. et al.: "La mortalita per cause in Umbria", 1994-2004, Regione dell'Umbria, Perugia, 2005.

[13] La Rosa F.: "RTUP working Group. La frequenza del cancro in Umbria", 1994-2002, Perugia, Regione dell'Umbria, 2005.

[14] Parkin D.M., Chen W., Ferlay J., Galceran J., Storm W.H., Whelan S.L.: "Comparability and quality control in cancer registration". Lyon, IARC Techn Rep no. 19, 1994.

[15] "W HO. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, tenth revision (ICD-10)". Geneva, World Health Organisation, 1992.

[16) Mastrandrea V., Vitali R., La Rosa F., Petrinelli A.M.: "Incidenzae mortalita per tumori maligni in Umbria (1978-1982)", Regione dell'Umbria, Perugia, 1988.

[17] Breslow N.E., Day N.E.: "Statistical methods in cancer research". Vol II. The design and analysis of cohort studies. IARC Sc. Pub. no. 82, Lyon, IARC, 1987, 71.

[18] ISTAT. Classificazione dei comuni secondo le caratteristiche urbane e rurali, Roma, 1986.

[19] Robsahm T.E., Tretli S.: "Weak association between sociodemographic factors and breast cancer: possible effect or early detection". Eur. J. Cancer. Prev., 2005, 14, 7.

[20] Ocafia-Riola R., Sanchez-Cantalejo C., Rosell J., Sanchez-Cantalejo E., Daponte A.: "Socio-economic level, farming activities and risk of cancer in small areas of Southern Spain". Eur. J. Epidemiol., 2004, 19, 643.

[21] Uccelli R., Mastrantonio M., Di Paola M.: "Distribuzione delle cause di morte in comuni a diverso grado di urbanizzazione". Epidemiol. Prev., 2000, 24, 28.

[22] Dalton S.O., During M., Ross L., Carlsen K., Mortensen P.B., Lynch J., Johansen C.: "The relation between socioeconomic and demographic factors and tumour stage in women diagnosed with breast cancer in Denmark. 1983-1999". Br. J. Cancer, 2006, 95, 653.

[23] Wronkowski Z., Bielska-Lasota M., Zielinski J., Romejko M.: "Striking differences in the epidemiological picture of breast cancer in urban and rural areas in Poland". Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 1993, 14 (suppl.), 179.

[24] Coughlin S.S., Thompson T.D., Hall H.I., Logan P., Uhler R.J.: "Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and non rural areas of the United States, 1998-1999". Cancer, 2002, 94, 2801.

[25] Coughlin S.S., Uhler R.J.: "Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among Hispanic women in the United States and Puerto Rico, 1998-1999". Prev. Med., 2002, 34, 242.

[26] Carr W.P.,M aldonado G.,L eonard P.R.,H albers J.U.,C hurh T.R., Mandel J.H. et al.: "Mammogram utilization among farm women". J. Rural. Health., 1996, 12, 278.

[27] Flynn B.S., Gavin P., Worden J.K., Ashikaga T., Gautam S., Carpenter J.: "Community education program to promote marnmography partecipation in rural New York State". Prev. Med., 1997, 26, 102.

[28] Schootman M., Fuortes L.J.: "Breast and cervical carcinoma. The correlation of activity limitations and rurality with screening, disease incidence, and mortality". Cancer, 1999, 86, 1087.

[29] Abrami R., Cattaneo A.: "Determinant factors for the use of screening for cervical cancer in Friuli Venezia Giulia". Minerva Ginecol., 1999, 51,335.

[30] Montella M., Biondi E., De Marco M., Botti G., Tatangelo F., Capasso I., Marone A.: "Sociodemoghraphic factors associated with the diagnostic staging of breast cancer in southern Italy" Cancer, 1995, 76, 1585.

[31] Wronkowski Z., Bielska-Lasota M., Zielinski J., Romejko M.: "Changes in the incidence and survival of ovarian cancer in Poland". Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oneal., 1993, 14 (suppl), 159.

[32] Drescher C., Holt S.K., Andersen M.R., Anderson G., Urban N.: "Reported ovarian cancer screening among a population-based sample in Washington state". Obstet. Gynecol., 2000, 96, 70.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top