Article Data

  • Views 235
  • Dowloads 105

Original Research

Open Access

Outcome of uterine clear cell carcinomas compared to endometrioid carcinomas and poorly-differentiated endometrioid carcinomas

  • P. Petignat1,2,*,
  • M. Usel3
  • P. Gauthier1
  • Y. Popowski4
  • M.F. Pelte5
  • C. Bouchardy3
  • H.M. Verkooijen3

1Gynecologic Oncology Service, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM) - Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, Quebec, Canada

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Senology Unit, Geneva University Hospitals,Switzerland

3Geneva Cancer Registry, Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, Geneva University, Switzerland

4Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland

5Department of Clinical Pathology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo20080157 Vol.29,Issue 1,January 2008 pp.57-60

Published: 10 January 2008

*Corresponding Author(s): P. Petignat E-mail: patrick.petignat@hcuge.ch

Abstract

Objectives: Our aim was to compare the survival between patients with clear cell carcinoma (CC) and patients with endometrioid carcinoma (EC). Methods: Through the population-based Geneva Cancer Registry, we identified 1,380 resident women diagnosed with uterine cancer between 1970 and 2000. We excluded those with papillary serous endometrial carcinoma and uterine sarcomas. We categorized patients as CC (n = 32, 2.8%) or EC (n = 1, 145, 97.2%). Uterine cancer-specific survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. We used Cox proportional hazards analysis to compare uterine cancer mortality risks between groups, and adjusted these risks for other prognostic factors. Results: CC patients presented with a more advanced stage at diagnosis than EC patients (p = 0.002). Compared to women with EC, women with CC had a significantly greater risk of dying from their disease (hazard ratio [HR] 2.9, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.7-4.9). After adjustment for age, stage and adjuvant chemotherapy, the risk of dying from uterine cancer was still significantly higher for CC patients (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.4). By univariate analysis, the risk of dying of endometrial cancer was not significantly higher in CC patients than in patients with poorly-differentiated EC (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.7-2.3). Conclusion: This population-based investigation shows that patients with CC have a poorer outcome than those with EC. Studies to determine the role of adjuvant treatment in CC patients are needed.

Keywords

Adjuvant chemotherapy; Endometrioid carcinoma; Clear cell carcinoma; Survival

Cite and Share

P. Petignat,M. Usel,P. Gauthier,Y. Popowski,M.F. Pelte,C. Bouchardy,H.M. Verkooijen. Outcome of uterine clear cell carcinomas compared to endometrioid carcinomas and poorly-differentiated endometrioid carcinomas. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2008. 29(1);57-60.

References

[1] Creasman W.T., Kohler M.F., Odicino F., Maisonneuve P., Boyle P.: “Prognosis of papillary serous, clear cell, and grade 3 stage I carcinoma of the endometrium”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 95, 593.

[2] Hamilton C.A., Cheung M.K., Osann K., Chen L., Teng N.N., Longacre T.A. et al.: “Uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas predict for poorer survival compared to grade 3 endometrioid corpus cancers”. Br. J. Cancer, 2006, 13, 642.

[3] Cirisano F.D. Jr, Robboy S.J., Dodge R.K., Bentley R.C., Krigman H.R., Synan I.S. et al.: “The outcome of Stage I-II clinically and surgically staged papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared with EC”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 77, 55.

[4] Webb G.A., Lagios M.D.: “Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1987, 156, 1486.

[5] Carcangiu M.L., Chambers J.T.: “Early pathologic stage clear cell carcinoma and uterine papillary serous carcinoma of the endometrium: comparison of clinicopathologic features and survival”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 1995, 14, 30.

[6] Abeler V.M., Vergote I.B., Kjorstad K.E., Trope C.G.: “Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium. Prognosis and metastatic pattern”. Cancer, 1996, 78, 1740.

[7] Photopulos G.J., Carney C.N., Edelman D.A., Hughes R.R., Fowler W.C. Jr, Walton L.A.: “Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium”. Cancer, 1979, 43, 1448.

[8] Malpica A., Tornos C., Burke T.W., Silva E.G. et al.: “Low-stage clear-cell carcinoma of the endometrium”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 1995, 19, 769.

[9] Murphy K.T., Rotmensch J., Yamada S.D., Mundt A.J.: “Outcome and patterns of failure in pathologic Stages I-IV clear-cell carcinoma of the endometrium: implications for adjuvant radiation therapy”. Int. J. Rad. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2003, 55, 1272.

[10] Alektiar K.M., McKee A., Lin O., Venkatraman E., Zelefsky M.J., McKee B. et al.: “Is there a difference in outcome between Stage I-II endometrial cancer of papillary serous/clear cell and endometrioid FIGO Grade 3 cancer?”. Int. J. Rad. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2002, 54, 79.

[11] Giri P.G., Schneider V., Belgrad R.: “Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium: An uncommon entity with a favorable prognosis”. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 1981, 7, 1383.

[12] Bouchardy C.: “Cancer Incidence in Five Continents”. Vol VII. Lyon, France, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1997, 666.

[13] WHO, ICD-O International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. 1976.

[14] Trope C., Kristensen G.B., Abeler V.M.: “Clear-cell and papillary serous cancer: treatment options”. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2001, 15, 433.

[15] Kurman R.J., Scully R.E.: “Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium: an analysis of 21 cases”. Cancer, 1976, 37, 872.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top