Article Data

  • Views 1134
  • Dowloads 128

Original Research

Open Access

Pathological complete response after primary chemotherapy in a mother and daughter with hereditary breast carcinoma: two case reports

  • B. Melichar1,*,
  • P. Fridrichová2
  • Sˇ. Lukesˇová1
  • J. Mergancová3
  • H. Urminská4
  • A. Rysˇka5
  • L. Foretová6

1Departments of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Czech Republic

2Departments of Medical Genetics, Czech Republic

3Departments of Surgery, Czech Republic

4Departments of Radiology, Czech Republic

5Departments of Pathology, Charles University Medical School & Teaching Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic

6Department of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo200802188 Vol.29,Issue 2,March 2008 pp.188-190

Published: 10 March 2008

*Corresponding Author(s): B. Melichar E-mail:

Abstract

The prognosis of patients with BRCA1-related breast carcinomas is inferior to the patients without BRCA1 mutation, but most of these tumors have a so-called triple negative phenotype characterized by increased chemosensitivity. Information regarding the chemosensitivity of BRCA1-related breast carcinomas is limited. We present a case of a mother and daughter with hereditary breast carcinoma treated with primary chemotherapy using the dose-dense combination of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide and sequential weekly paclitaxel administration. Pathological complete response was observed in both patients. Subsequent genetic analysis revealed the same BRCA1 mutation with exon 5-14 deletion in both women. The present experience as well as other reports indicate increased sensitivity of BRCA1-related breast carcinoma to primary chemotherapy.

Keywords

Hereditary breast carcinoma; BRCA1; Pathological complete response

Cite and Share

B. Melichar,P. Fridrichová,Sˇ. Lukesˇová,J. Mergancová,H. Urminská,A. Rysˇka,L. Foretová. Pathological complete response after primary chemotherapy in a mother and daughter with hereditary breast carcinoma: two case reports. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2008. 29(2);188-190.

References

[1] Veronesi U., Boyle P., Goldhirsch A., Orecchia R., Viale G.: “Breast cancer”. Lancet, 2005, 365, 1727.

[2] Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group: "Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials". Lancet , 2005, 365, 1687.

[3] Estevez L.G., Gradishar W.J.: “Evidence-based use of neoadjuvant taxane in operable and inoperable breast cancer”. Clin. Cancer Res., 2004, 10, 3249.

[4] Kaufmann M., Hortobagyi G.N., Goldhirsch A., Scholl S., Makris A., Valagussa P. et al.: “Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2006, 24, 1940.

[5] Chevallier B., Roche H., Olivier J.P., Chollet P., Hurteloup P.: “Inflammatory breast cancer. Pilot study of intensive induction chemotherapy (FEC-HD) results in high histologic response rate”. Am. J. Clin. Oncol., 1993, 16, 223.

[6] Chollet P., Amat S., Cure H., de Latour M., Le Bouedec G., Mouret-Reynier M.A. et al.: “Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer”. Br. J. Cancer, 2002, 86, 1041.

[7] Bear H.D., Anderson S., Smith R.E., Geyer C.E., Mamounas E.P., Fischer B. et al.: “Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol B-27”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2006, 24, 2019.

[8] Machiavelli M.R., Romero A.O., Perez J.E., Lacava J.A., Domin -guez M.E., Rodriguez R., et al.: “Prognostic significance of pathological response of primary tumor and metastatic axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma”. Cancer J. Sci. Am., 1998, 4, 125.

[9] Thomas E., Holmes F.A., Smith T.L., Buzdar A.U., Frye D.K., Fraschini G., et al.: “The use of alternate, non-cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of pathologic response to a neoadjuvant doxorubicin-based regimen in women with operable breast cancer: long-term results from a prospective randomized trial”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2004, 22, 2294.

[10] King M.C., Marks J.H., Mandell J.B.: “Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2”. Science, 2003, 302, 643.

[11] Robson M.E., Chappuis P.O., Satagopan J., Wong N., Boyd J., Goffin J.R., et al.: “A combined analysis of outcome following breast cancer: differences in survival based on BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status and administration of adjuvant treatment”. Breast Cancer Res., 2004, 6, R8.

[12] Goffin J.R., Chappuis P.O., Begin L.R., Wong N., Brunet J.S., Hamel N., et al.: “Impact of germline BRCA1 mutations and overexpression of p53 on prognosis and response to treatment following breast carcinoma. 10-year follow-up data”. Cancer, 2003, 97, 527.

[13] Rubin S.C., Benjamin I., Benbakht K., Takahashi H., Morgan M.A., LiVolsi V.A., et al.: “Clinical and pathological features of ovarian cancer in women with germ-line mutations of BRCA1”. N. Engl. J. Med., 1996, 335, 1413.

[14] Boyd J., Sonoda Y., Federici M.G., Bogomolniy F., Rhei E., Maresco D.L., et al.: “Clinicopathologic features of BRCA-linked and sporadic ovarian cancer”. JAMA, 2000, 283, 2260.

[15] Cass I., Baldwin R.L., Varkes T., Moslehi R., Narod S.A., Karlan B.Y.: “Improved survival in women with BRCA-associated ovarian carcinoma”. Cancer, 2003, 97, 2187.

[16] Cleator S., Heller W., Coombes C.R.: “Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options”. Lancet Oncol., 2007, 8, 235.

[17] Chappuis P.O., Goffin J., Wong N., Perret C., Ghadirian P., Tonin P.N., et al.: “A significant response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in BRCA1/2 related breast cancer”. J. Med. Genet., 2002, 39, 608.

[18] Warner E., Trudeau M., Holloway C.: “Sensitivity of BRCA-1- related breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: practical implications”. Breast J., 2003, 9, 507.

[19] Kennedy R.D., Quinn J.E., Mullan P.B., Johnston P.G., Harkin D.P.: “The role of BRCA1 in the cellular response to chemotherapy”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2004, 96, 1659.

[20] Citron M.L., Berry D.A., Cirrincione C., Hudis C., Winer E.P., Gradishar W.J., et al.: “Randomized trial, of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of nodepositive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B trial 9741”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2003, 21, 1431.

[21] Henderson I.C., Berry D., Demetri G., Cirrincione C., Goldstein L., Martino S., et al.: “Improved outcomes from adding sequential paclitaxel but not from the escalating doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2003, 21, 976.

[22] Green M.C., Buzdar A.U., Smith T., Ibrahim N.K., Valero V., Rosales M.F., et al.: “Weekly paclitaxel improves pathologic complete remission in operable breast cancer when compared with paclitaxel with paclitaxel once every 3 weeks”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2005, 23, 5983.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top