Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Does vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia have the same evolution as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
1Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Italy
2Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Italy
3Preventive Oncological Gynecology. Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monteluce Clinic, Perugia, Italy
*Corresponding Author(s): U. Indraccolo E-mail: ugo.indraccolo@libero.it
Background: Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia is a little known disease which could be related to risk factors different from simple HPV infections. Objective: To ascertain wheter vaginal lesions have a natural history similar to cervical lesions. Materials & Methods: A retrospective study to identify patients with vaginal lesions and synchronous cervical lesions through biopsy. The rate of mild cervical lesions (koilocytosis, warts, CIN I with and without koilocytosis) was compared with the rate of severe cervical lesions (CIN II and III, cervical carcinoma) in patients with mild vaginal lesions (warts and koilocytosis, and low-grade VAIN) and in patients with severe vaginal lesions (high-grade VAIN). Using koilocytosis as a marker, the rate of "active" cervical lesions was compared with the rate of "non active" cervical lesions in patients with "active" versus "non active" vaginal lesions. Finally, the rates of mild and severe cervical lesions were compared among each group of VAIN (low-grade, high-grade, with or without koilocytosis). Results: In patients with mild vaginal lesions, mild cervical lesions were significantly more frequent than severe cervical lesions. In patients with "active" vaginal lesions the rate of "active" cervical lesions was significantly higher than "non active" cervical lesions. The differences in rates of mild cervical lesions and severe cervical lesions among patients with high-grade VAIN and low-grade VAIN (with and without koilocytosis) were not significant. Conclusion: These data suggest that CIN and VAIN may have some comition features in certain cases, i.e., if an HPV infection is proved.
VAIN; Koilocytosis; CIN
U. Indraccolo,L. Chiocci,A. Baldoni. Does vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia have the same evolution as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2008. 29(4);371-373.
[1] Micheletti L., Zanotto Valentino M.C., Barbero M., Preti M., Nicolaci P., Canni M.: “Current knowledge about the natural history of intraepithelial neoplasms of the vagina”. Minerva Ginecol., 1994, 46, 195.
[2] Singer A., Monaghan J.M.: “Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia”. In: Singer A. and Monaghan J.M. (eds.): “Lower Genital Tract Precancer. Colposcopy, Pathology and Treatment”. Oxford, Blackwell Science Ltd Onsey Mead., 1999, 160.
[3] Totti S.A.: “Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN)”. In: Prendiville W., Ritter J., Totti S.A., Twiggs L. (eds.): “Colposcopy: Management Options”. Edinburgh, W.B. Saunders, 2003, 135.
[4] Vinokurova S., Wentzensen N., Einekel J., Klaes R., Ziegert C., Melsheimer P. et al.: “Clonal history of papillomavirus-induced dysplasia in the female lower genital tract”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2005, 97, 1816.
[5] Hampl M., Wentzensen N., Vinokurova S., von Knebel-Doeberitz M., Poremba C., Bender H.G. et al.: “Comprehensive analysis of 130 multicentric intraepithelial female lower genital tract lesions by HPV typing and p16 expression profile”. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., 2007, 133, 235.
[6] Crum C.P.: “The female genital tract”. In: Cotran R.S., Kumar V., Collins T. (eds.): “Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease”. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1999, 1035.
[7] Ambros R.A., Kurman R.J.: “Current concepts in the relationship of human papillomavirus infection to the pathogenesis and classification of precancerous squamous lesions of the uterine cervix”. Semin. Diagn. Pathol., 1990, 7, 158.
[8] Aho M., Vesterinen E., Meyer B., Purola E., Paavonen J.: “Natural history of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia”. Cancer, 1991, 68, 195.
[9] Kruse A.J., Baak J.P., Helliesen T., Kjellevold K.H., Robboy S.J.: “Prognostic value and reproducibility of koilocytosis in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 2003, 22, 236.
[10] Abadi M.A., Ho G.Y., Burk R.D., Romney S.L., Kadish A.S.: “Stringent criteria for histological diagnosis of koilocytosis fail to eliminate overdiagnosis of human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1”. Hum. Pathol., 1998, 29, 54.
[11] Steenbergen R.D., de Wilde J., Wilting S.M., Brink A.A., Snijders P.J., Meijer C.J.: “HPV-mediated transformation of the anogenital tract”. J. Clin. Virol., 2005, 32 (suppl. 1), S25.
[12] Schlecht N.F., Kulaga S,. Robitaille J., Ferreira S., Santos M., Miyamura R.A. et al.: “Persistent human papillomavirus infection as a predictor of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia”. JAMA, 2001, 286, 3106.
[13] Minucci D., Cinel A., Insacco E., Oselladore M.: “Epidemiological aspects of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN)”. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol., 1995, 22, 42. Address
Top