Article Data

  • Views 256
  • Dowloads 138

Original Research

Open Access

A retrospective analysis of borderline ovarian tumors in a Greek University Hospital

  • A. Liapis1
  • K. Bakalianou1
  • C. Iavazzo1,*,
  • N. Salakos1
  • G. Paltoglou1
  • A. Kondi-Pafiti1

12nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, University of Athens, Aretaieion Hospital, Athens, Greece

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo200804383 Vol.29,Issue 4,July 2008 pp.383-385

Published: 10 July 2008

*Corresponding Author(s): C. Iavazzo E-mail: christosiavazzo@hotmail.com

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the pathologic and clinical characteristics of borderline ovarian tumors. Methods/Results: During the period from January 1993 up to December 2002 we found 93 cases of borderline ovarian tumors. The mean age of patients was 44.3 years (range 28.9-59.7 years); 77.4%, 10.8% and 11.8% of patients had Stage 1, 11 and 111, respectively. The histological outcomes revealed 52.7% of serous and 41.9% of inucinous origin; 44.1% underwent radical Surgery, whereas 55.9% had unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or cystectomy. The mean follow-up was 84 +/- 22 months. The overall five-year survival was 97.4% and 98% for mucinous and serous tumors, respectively. The survival rate was 100%, 90% and 81.8% in Stages I, II and III, respectively. Conclusion: From our results it can be concluded that borderline ovarian tumors have a favorable prognosis even after conservative management.

Keywords

Borderline ovarian tumors; Management; Prognosis; Low malignant potential

Cite and Share

A. Liapis,K. Bakalianou,C. Iavazzo,N. Salakos,G. Paltoglou,A. Kondi-Pafiti. A retrospective analysis of borderline ovarian tumors in a Greek University Hospital. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2008. 29(4);383-385.

References

[1] Cadron I., Amant F., VanGorp T., Neren P., Leunen K., Vergote I.: “The management of borderline tumours of the ovary”. Curr. Opin. Oncol., 2006, 18, 488.

[2] Seidman J.D., Soslow R.A., Vang R., Berman J.J., Stoler M.H., Sherman M.E. et al.: “Borderline ovarian tumors: diverse contemporary viewpoints on terminology and diagnostic criteria with illustrative images”. Hum. Pathol., 2004, 35, 918.

[3] Bell D.A., Longacre T.A., Prat J., Kohn E.C., Soslow R.A., Ellenson L.H. et al.: “Serous borderline (low malignant potential, atypical proliferative) ovarian tumors: workshop perspectives”. Hum. Pathol., 2004, 35, 934.

[4] Morice P.: “Borderline tumours of the ovary and fertility”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2006, 42, 149.

[5] Burks R.T., Sherman M.E., Kurman R.J.: “Micropapillary serous carcinoma of the ovary. A distinctive low grade carcinoma related to serous borderline tumors”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 1996, 20, 1319.

[6] Teneriello M.G., Ebina M., Linnoila R.I., Henry M., Nash J.D., Park R.C. et al.: “p53 and Ki-ras gene mutations in epithelial ovarian neoplasms”. Cancer Res., 1993, 53, 3103.

[7] Chan W.Y., Cheung K.K., Schorge J.O., Huang L.W., Welch W.R., Bell D.A. et al.: “Bcl-2 and p53 protein expression, apoptosis, and p53 mutation in human epithelial ovarian cancers”. Am. J. Pathol., 2000, 156, 409.

[8] Shih I.-M., Kurman R.J.: “Ovarian tumorigenesis: a proposed model based on morphological and molecular genetic analysis”. Am. J. Pathol., 2004, 164, 1511.

[9] Ayhan A., Guven S., Guven E.S., Kucukali T.: “Is there a correlation between tumor marker panel and tumor size and histopathology in well staged patients with borderline ovarian tumors?”. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 2007, 86, 484.

[10] Engelen M.J., de Bruijn H.W., Hollema H., ten Hoor K.A., Willense P.H., Aalders P.G. et al.: “Serum CA125, carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 19-9 as tumor markers in borderline ovarian tumors”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 78, 16.

[11] Kaern J., Trope C.G., Kristensen G.B., Abeler V.M., Pettersen E.O. et al.: “DNA ploidy; the most important prognostic factor in patients with borderline tumours of the ovary”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Cancer, 1993, 3, 349.

[12] Le-Ming S., Kurman R.J.: “Molecular pathogenesis of ovarian borderline tumors: new insights and old challenges”. Clin. Cancer Res., 2005, 11, 7273.

[13] International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: “Annual report and results of treatment in gynaecologic cancer”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 1989, 28, 189.

[14] Rota S.M., Zanetta G., Ieda N., Rossi R., Chiari S., Perego P. et al.: “Clinical relevance of retroperitoneal involvement from epithelial ovarian tumors of borderline malignancy”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 1999, 9, 477.

[15] Camatte S., Morice P., Thoury A., Fourchotte V., Pantier P., Lhomme C. et al.: “Impact of surgical staging in patients with macroscopic “Stage I” ovarian borderline tumors: analysis of a continuous series of 101 cases”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2004, 40, 1842.

[16] Seidman J.D., Kurman R.J.: “Ovarian serous borderline tumors: a critical review of the literature with emphasis on prognostic indicators”. Hum. Pathol., 2000, 31, 539.

[17] Yinon Y., Beiner M.E., Gotlieb W.H., Korach Y., Perri T., Ben- Baruch G.: “Clinical outcome of cystectomy compared with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy as fertility-sparing treatment of borderline ovarian tumors”. Fertil. Steril., 2007, 88, 479.

[18] Odegaard E., Staff A.C., Langebrekke A., Engh V., Onsrud M.: “Surgery of borderline tumors of the ovary: retrospective comparison of short-term outcome after laparoscopy or laparotomy”. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 2007, 86, 620.

[19] Zanetta G., Rota S., Chiari S., Bonazzi C., Bratina G., Mangioni C. et al.: “Behavior of borderline tumors with particular interest to persistence, recurrence and progression into invasive carcinoma: a prospective study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2001, 19, 2658.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top