Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Twelve-month follow-up detection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA for 93 cases with cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 (CIN 2-3) after a loop electrosurgical excisional procedure (LEEP)
1Gynaecology and Obstetrics Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
*Corresponding Author(s): L. Geng E-mail: youketg@163.com
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to follow-up cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 or 3 (CIN2/3) cases after a loop electrosurgical excisional procedure (LEEP) by liquid-based cytology (LBC) and detection of HPV DNA. Methods: LEEP was performed for the first diagnosed CIN2/3 cases. Six and 12 months after LEEP, LBC and HPV DNA detection were performed. Results: The number of cases with CIN2 accounted for 64.5% (60/93) of the total cases before LEEP. Six months post LEEP, the number of cases with normal LBC and negative HPV DNA accounted for 63.4% (59/93). Cases with abnormal LBC accounted for 17.2 (16/93), and cases with persistent positive HPV DNA accounted for 11.8% (7/93). Two cases had both persistent positive HPV DNA and abnormal LBC. A vaginal intraepithelial neoplasm (VAIN2) was found in one of the HPV DNA persistent positive cases. Twelve months post LEEP, 4.3% (8/93) of the cases were HPV DNA positive. Abnormal LBC was observed in four cases (of which 2 cases were HPV DNA positive) with normal LBC and negative HPV DNA at six months post LEEP. Conclusion: HPV DNA examination is instrumental for the detection of VAIN.
Loop electrosurgical excisional procedure; Human papillomavirus; Follow-up
H.Y. Guo,Y.L. Guo,K. You,L. Geng. Twelve-month follow-up detection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA for 93 cases with cervicalintraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 (CIN 2-3) after a loop electrosurgical excisional procedure (LEEP). European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2011. 32(2);164-167.
[1] Milla Villeda R.H., Gurrola Medrano T.: “Diathermic loop treatment of subclinical cervical infection by human papilloma virus (HPV). Short term effectiveness”. Gynecol. Obstet. Mex., 1995, 63, 293.
[2] Gardeil F., Barry-Walsh C., Prendiville W., Clinch J., Turner M.J.: “Persistent intraepithelial neoplasia after excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1997, 89, 419.
[3] Paraskevaidis E., Kalantaridou S.N., Paschopoulos M., Zikopoulos K., Diakomanolis E., Dalkalitsis N. et al.: “Factors affecting outcome after incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2003, 24, 541.
[4] Orbo A., Arnesen T., Arnes M., Straume B.: “Resection margins in conization as prognostic marker for relapse in highgrade dysplasia of the uterine cervix in northern Norway: a retrospective long-term follow-up material”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 93, 479.
[5] Ostor A.G.: “Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 1993, 12, 186.
[6] Eduardo A.M., Dinh T.V., Hannigan E.V., Yandell R.B., Schnadig
V.J.: “Outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Can it replace cold knife conization?”. J. Reprod. Med., 1996, 41, 729.
[7] Huang L.W., Hwang J.L.: “A comparison between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1999, 73, 12.
[8] Prendiville W.: “Large loop excision of the transformation zone”. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol., 1995, 38, 622.
[9] Alonso I., Torne A., Puig-Tintore L.M., Esteve R., Quinto L., Campo E. et al.: “Pre- and post-conization high-risk HPV testing predicts residual/recurrent disease in patients treated for CIN 2-3”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 103, 631.
[10] Aerssens A., Claeys P., Garcia A., Sturtewagen Y., Velasquez R., Vanden Broeck D. et al.: “Natural history and clearance of HPV after treatment of precancerous cervical lesions”. Histopathology, 2008, 52, 381.
[11] Bae J.H., Kim C.J., Park T.C., Namkoong S.E., Park J.S.: “Persistence of human papillomavirus as a predictor for treatment failure after loop electrosurgical excision procedure”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2007, 17, 1271.
[12] Houfflin Debarge V., Collinet P., Vinatier D., Ego A., Dewilde A., Boman F. et al.: “Value of human papillomavirus testing after conization by loop electrosurgical excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2003, 90, 587.
[13] Aerssens A., Claeys P., Beerens E., Garcia A ., Weyers S., Van Renterghem L. et al.: “Prediction of recurrent disease by cytology and HPV testing after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia”. Cytopathology, 2009, 20, 27.
[14] Kreimer A.R., Guido R.S., Solomon D.: “Human papillomavirus testing following loop electrosurgical excision procedure identifies women at risk for posttreatment cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 disease”. Cancer Epidem. Biomarker. Prev., 2006, 15, 908.
[15] de-Cabezon R.H., Sala C.V., Gomis S.S., Lliso A.R., Bellvert
C.G.: “Evaluation of cervical dysplasia treatment by large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). Does completeness of excision determine outcome?”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 1998, 78, 83.
[16] Khunamornpong S., Raungrongmorakot K., Siriaunkgul S.: “Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital :problems in pathologic evaluation”. J. Med. Assoc. Thai., 2001, 84, 507.
[17] Gimpelson R.J., Graham B.: “Using amino2cerv after cervical LEEP”. J. Reprod. Med., 1999, 44, 275.
[18] Soutter W.P., Sasieni P., Panoskaltsis T.: “Long-term risk of invasive cervical cancer after treatment of squamous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia”. Int. J. Cancer, 2006, 118, 2048.
[19] Wang T., Kong W.M., Li B.Z., Wu Y.M.: “Clinical management of patients with positive excision margin after cervical conization: analysis of 148 cases”. Chung-Hua i Hsueh Tsa Chih (Chinese Medical Journal), 2008, 88, 1331.
[20] Felix J.C., Muderspach L.I., Duggan B.D., Roman L.D.: “The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1994, 84, 996.
[21] Wright T.C. Jr., Massad L.S., Dunton C.J., Spitzer M., Wilkinson E., Solomon D.: “2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ”. J. Low Genit. Tract. Dis., 2008, 11, 223.
[22] Jeng C.J., Shen J., Huang S.H.: “Partial trachelectomy: a new treatment choice for persistent or recurrent high grade cervicalintraepithelial neoplasia”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 100, 231.
[23] Persad V.L., Pierotic M.A., Guijon F.B.: “Management of cervical neoplasia: a 13-year experience with cryotherapy and laser”. J. Low Genit. Tract. Dis., 2001, 5, 199.
[24] Paraskevaidis E., Arbyn M., Sotiriadis A., Diakomanolis E., Martin-Hirsch P., Koliopoulos G. et al.: “The role of HPV DNA testing in the follow-up period after treatment for CIN: a systematic review of the literature”. Cancer Treat. Rev., 2004, 30, 205.
Top