Article Data

  • Views 220
  • Dowloads 124

Original Research

Open Access

Efficiency of postoperative pain management after gynecologic oncological surgeries with the use of morphine + acetaminophen + ketoprofen versus morphine + metamizol + ketoprofen

  • Samulak1,2,3
  • M. Michalska1,*,
  • M. Gaca4
  • M. Wilczak5
  • E. Mojs6
  • M. Chuchracki2,7

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Regional Hospital in Kalisz, Poland

2Cathedral of Mother’s and Child’s Health, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

3Clinic of Gynecological Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

4Clinic of Anaesthesiology in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

5Department of Medical Education, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

6Department of Clinical Psychology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

7Institute of Practical Learning of Midwifery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo201102168 Vol.32,Issue 2,March 2011 pp.168-170

Published: 10 March 2011

*Corresponding Author(s): M. Michalska E-mail: magdalena-m-michalska@wp.pl

Abstract

Surgical treatment used in gynecological oncology involves acute postoperative pain which requires efficient treatment. This study covered a group of 128 patients who were randomly divided into two groups. In the postoperative period patients in group I were administered morphine subcutaneously, acetaminophen intravenously and naproxen per rectum. The pain intensity level was checked by means of the pain intensity numeric rating scale (NRS). In the instances of pain rated at 5 or more, patients were additionally administered ketoprofen intravenously. Patients in group II were administered morphine, naproxen, and metamizole instead of acetaminophen and ketoprofen additionally. In group I after the administration of morphine and acetaminophen 22 patients (34.37%) needed additional doses of ketoprofen. In group II 33 women (51.56%) required ketoprofen after the administration of morphine and metamizole (N1 = 22 vs N2 = 33, p < 0.05). The use of metamizol with morphine (without ketoprofen) gave worse analgesic results than acetaminophen with morphine, but the combination of morphine, acetaminophen and ketoprofen or morphine, metamizol and ketoprofen gave satisfactory analgesic results.

Keywords

Postoperative analgesia; Morphine; Acetaminophen; Metamizol; Ketoprofen; Genital carcinomas

Cite and Share

Samulak,M. Michalska,M. Gaca,M. Wilczak,E. Mojs,M. Chuchracki. Efficiency of postoperative pain management after gynecologic oncological surgeries with the use of morphine + acetaminophen + ketoprofen versus morphine + metamizol + ketoprofen. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2011. 32(2);168-170.

References

[1] Wordliczek J.: “Ból pooperacyjny”. [w:] Medycyna bólu. Red. Dobrogowski J., Wordliczek J. PZWL, Warszawa, 2004, 102.

[2] Dahl V., Raeder J.C.: “Non-opioid postoperative analgesia”. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand., 2000, 44, 1191.

[3] Ziser A., Murray M.J.: “Postoperative pain. Analgesics make a difference in many ways”. Postgrad Med., 1993, 93, 173.

[4] Kotarski J., Dobrogowski J., Pore˛ba R., Skre˛t A, Spaczynski M., Wordliczek J. et al.: “Rekomendaje dotycza˛ce poste˛powania przeciwbólowego w ginekologii i połoz.nictwie. Cze˛sc I: Leczenie bólu po zabiegach ginekologicznych. Ginekol. Pol., 2008, 79, 567.

[5] Werawatganon T., Charuluxanun S.: “Patient controlled intravenous opioid analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia for pain after intra-abdominal surgery”. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2005, Jan. 25, CD004088.

[6] Chen L.M., Weinberg V.K., Chen C., Powell C.B., Chen L.L., Chan J.K., Burkhardt D.H. 3rd.: “Perioperative outcomes comparing patient controlled epidural versus intravenous analgesia in gynecologic oncology surgery”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 115, 357.

[7] Hudcova J., McNicol E., Quah C., Lau J., Carr D.B.: “Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus conventional opioid analgesiafor postoperative pain”. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2006, Oct. 18, CD003348.

[8] Bell J.G., Shaffer L.E., Schrickel-Feller T.: “Randomized trial comparing 3 methods of postoperative analgesia in gynecology patients: patient-controlled intravenous, scheduled intravenous, and scheduled subcutaneous”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2007, 197,

472. e1.

[9] Pearl M.L., McCauley D.L., Thompson J., Mahler L., Valea F.A., Chalas E.: “A randomized controlled trial of early oral analgesia in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2002, 99 (5 pt 1), 704.

[10] White P.F.: “Multimodal analgesia: its role in preventing postoperative pain”. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs., 2008, 9, 76.

[11] Wordliczek J., Dobrogowski J.: “U mierzanie bólu pooperacyjnego po zabiegach uroginekologicznych. W: Uroginekologia praktyczna”. Red. Rechberger T. BiFOLIUM, Lublin, 2007, 315.

[12] Mugabure Bujedo B., Tranque Bizueta I., González Santos S., Adrián Garde R.: “Multimodal approaches to postoperative pain management and convalescence”. Rev. Esp. Anestesiol. Reanim., 2007, 54, 29.

[13] Buvanendran A., Kroin J.S.: “Multimodal analgesia for controlling acute postoperative pain”. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol., 2009, 22, 588.

[14] Schug S.A., Manopas A.: “Update on the role of non-opioids for postoperative pain treatment”. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol., 2007, 21, 15.

[15] McDaid C., Maund E., Rice S., Wright K., Jenkins B., Woolacott N.: “Paracetamol and selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the reduction of morphinerelated side effects after major surgery: a systematic review”. Health. Technol. Assess., 2010, 14, 1.

[16] Ong C.K., Seymour R.A., Lirk P., Merry A.F.: “Combining paracetamol (acetaminophen) with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: a qualitative systematic review of analgesic efficacy foracute postoperative pain”. Anesth. Analg., 2010, 110, 1170.

[17] McNicol E., Strassels S.A., Goudas L., Lau J., Carr D.B.: “NSAIDS or paracetamol, alone or combined with opioids, for cancer pain”. Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 2005 Jan. 25, CD005180.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top