Article Data

  • Views 1190
  • Dowloads 101

Original Research

Open Access

Outcomes of conservative surgery in early epithelial ovarian carcinoma

  • X. Cheng1
  • B. Cheng1,*,
  • X. Wan1
  • W. Lu1
  • X. Xie1

1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo20120193 Vol.33,Issue 1,January 2012 pp.93-95

Published: 10 January 2012

*Corresponding Author(s): B. Cheng E-mail: chengbei128@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective: To investigate clinical outcomes and fertility status of conservative treatment for epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Methods: The data of clinicopathological characteristics and follow-up were retrospectively collected and analyzed in 17 patients with early epithelial ovarian carcinoma who underwent conservative surgery. Results: The tumor histologic types of 17 patients included 13 mucinous, one serous, one endometrioid, and two mixed mucinous and serous carcinomas. The FIGO stages were: ten Stage IA, six IC, and one IIIA disease. Tumor grades involved 15 grade 1 and two grade 2. Sixteen patients received adjuvant platinum-based combined chemotherapy. The medium duration of follow-up was 61 months (range 17 similar to 115 months). Only one patient recurred at 36 months after primary surgery. All of the 17 patients were alive at end of follow-up. Eight patients attempted pregnancy and five patients conceived naturally; there were six term pregnancies and one abortion. Conclusion: Conservative surgery can be considered for young patients with FIGO Stage I including grade 1 and grade 2 epithelial ovarian cancers who desire further childbearing.

Keywords

Epithelial ovarian carcinoma; Conservative surgery; Recurrence; Pregnancy

Cite and Share

X. Cheng,B. Cheng,X. Wan,W. Lu,X. Xie. Outcomes of conservative surgery in early epithelial ovarian carcinoma. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012. 33(1);93-95.

References

[1] 25th FIGO annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet., 2003, 83 (suppl. 1), ix-xxii, 1.

[2] Munnel E.W.: “Is conservative therapy ever justified in Stage I (Ia) cancer of the ovary?”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1969, 103, 641.

[3] Zanetta G., Chiari S., Rota S., Bratina G., Maneo A., Torri V. et al.: “Conservative surgery for Stage I ovarian carcinoma in women of childbearing age”. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1997, 104, 1030.

[4] Schilder J.M., Thompsom A.M., DePriest P.D., Ueland F.R., Cibull M.L., Kryscio R.J. et al.: “Outcome of reproductive age women with Stage IA and IC invasive epithelial ovarian cancer treated with fertility-sparing therapy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2002, 87, 1.

[5] Raspagliesi F., Fontanelli R., Paladini D., di Re E.M.: “Conservative surgery in high-risk epithelial ovarian carcinoma”. J. Am. Coll. Surg., 1997, 185, 457.

[6] Morice P., Wicart-Poque F., Rey A., El-Hassan J., Pautier P., Lhomme C. et al.: “Results of conservative treatment in epithelial ovarian carcinoma”. Cancer, 2001, 92, 2412.

[7] Morice P., Leblanc E., Rey A., Baron M., Querleu D., Blanchot J. et al.: “Conservative treatment in epithelial ovarian cancer: results of a multicentre study of the GCCLCC (Groupe des Chirurgiens de Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer) and SFOG (Société Française d’Oncologie Gynécologique)”. Hum. Reprod., 2005, 20, 1379.

[8] Park J.Y., Kim D.Y., Suh D.S., Kim J.H., Kim Y.M., Kim Y.T. et al.: “Outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer: Oncologic safety and reproductive outcomes”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 110, 345.

[9] Colombo N., Chiari S., Maggioni A., Bocciolone L., Torri V., Mangioni C.: “Controversial issues in the management of early epithelial ovarian cancer: conservative surgery and role of adjuvant therapy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1994, 55, S47.

[10] Duska L.R., Chang Y.C., Flynn C.E., Chen A.H., Goodman A., Fuller A.F. et al.: “Epithelial ovarian carcinoma in the reproductive age group”. Cancer, 1999, 85, 2623.

[11] Brown C., Hyman J., Almadrones L., Curtin J., Hoskins W.: “Conservative surgical management of early epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)”. Proc. ASCO, 1995, 14, 766.

[12] Douglas N.C., Fan L., Pothuri B., Herzog T.J., Sauer M.V.: “Fertility sparing therapy for ovarian cancer has inherent risks and benefits”. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2005, 272, 304.

[13] Zanagnolo V., Sartori E., Trussardi E., Pasinetti B., Maggino T.: “Preservation of ovarian function, reproductive ability and emotional attitudes in patients with malignant ovarian tumors”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2005, 123, 235.

[14] Borgfeldt C., Iosif C., Masback A.: “Fertility-sparing surgery and outcome in fertile women with ovarian borderline tumors and epithelial invasive ovarian cancer”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2007, 134, 110.

[15] Shimizu Y., Hasumi K., Kamoi S., Amada S., Silverberg S.G.: “A new histopathologic grading system for ovarian carcinoma”. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet., 2000, 70 (suppl. 4), D38.

[16] Colombo N., Parma G., Lapresa M.T., Maggi F., Plantanida P., Maggioni A.: “Role of conservative surgery in ovarian cancer: the European experience”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2005, 15 (suppl. 3), 206.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top