Article Data

  • Views 240
  • Dowloads 145

Original Research

Open Access

“Low-grade positivity” of HPV viral load after atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytology identifies women at low-risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and 3

  • M. Origoni1,*,
  • G. Carminati1
  • M. Sideri2
  • M. Clementi3
  • S. Rolla3
  • M. Candiani1

1Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Milano, Italy

2Preventive Gynecology Unit, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milano, Italy

3Department of Microbiology and Virology, Vita Salute San Raffaele University School of Medicine at San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo201203261 Vol.33,Issue 3,May 2012 pp.261-264

Published: 10 May 2012

*Corresponding Author(s): M. Origoni E-mail: massimo.origoni@hsr.it

Abstract

The correlation between high-risk HPV-DNA viral load, expressed as relative light units (RLU) values obtained from the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test, and the prevalence of CIN2/CIN3 was investigated and statistically analyzed in 614 ASC-US consecutive cases. Cases were categorized into three groups according to RLU values: "low-grade positivity", "intermediate positivity" and "high-grade positivity", and the prevalence of CIN2/CIN3 was evaluated in the single groups and compared among them. CIN/CIN3 rates demonstrated a significant (p < 0.001) increase with a direct correlation with increasing RLU values: 4.6% (RLU from 1.0 to 10.0), 9.1% (RLU from 11.0 to 100.0) and 32.2% (RLU > 100.0) respectively. The prevalence of CIN2/CIN3 between the group with RLU < 10.0 (4.6%) and the group with RLU > 10 (24.2%) showed statistical significance (p = 0.0002). Increasing hrHPV viral load significantly correlates with increasing prevalence of CIN2/CIN3 in ASC-US cases.

Keywords

ASC-US; HPV; HPV-DNA; viral load; HC2; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia; CIN

Cite and Share

M. Origoni,G. Carminati,M. Sideri,M. Clementi,S. Rolla,M. Candiani. “Low-grade positivity” of HPV viral load after atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytology identifies women at low-risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and 3. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012. 33(3);261-264.

References

[1] Waggoner S.E.: “Cervical cancer”. Lancet, 2003, 361, 2217.

[2] Mathew A., George P.S.: “Trends in incidence and mortality ratesod squamous cell carcinoma and adenocacrcinoma of cervix-worldwide”. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2009, 10, 645.

[3] Solomon D., Schiffman M., Tarone R., ALTS Study group: “Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: baseline results from a randomized trial”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2001, 93, 293.

[4] Wang J., Wu M., Zhang S., Li C., Zhang W.: “Prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance from cervical pap smears in Beijing”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2011, 32, 411.

[5] Poomtavorn Y., Suwannarurk K., Thaweekul Y., Maireang K.: “Risk factors for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) papanicolaou smears”. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2011, 12, 235.

[6] Runowicz C.D.: “Molecular screening for cervical cancer - time to give up Pap test?”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2007, 357, 1650.

[7] Wright T.C. Jr., Cox J.T., Massad L.S., Twiggs L.B., Wilkinson E.J. 2006 ASCCP-Sponsored Consensus Conference: “2006 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2007, 197, 346.

[8] Arbyn M., Sasieni P., Meijer C.J., Clavel C., Koliopoulos G., Dillner J. Chapter 9: “Clinical applications of HPV testing: a summary of meta-analyses”. Vaccine, 2006, 24 (suppl. 3), S3/78.

[9] The ASCUS-Low SIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group: “Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance”. Am. J. Obstet Gynecol., 2003, 188, 1383.

[10] Xu Y., Dotto J., Hui Y., Lawton K., Schofield K., Hui P.: “High grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and viral load of high-risk human papillomavirus: significant correlations in patients of 22 years old or younger”. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2009, 2, 169.

[11] Flores R., Papenfuss M., Klimecki W.T., Giuliano A.R.: “Crosssectional analysis of oncogenic HPV viral load and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia”. Int. J. Cancer, 2006, 118, 1187.

[12] Tsai H.T., Wu C.H., Lai H.L., Li R.N., Tung Y.C., Chuang H.Y. et al.: “Association between quantitative high-risk human papillomavirus DNA load and cervical intraepithelial neoplasm risk”. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev., 2005 (11 Pt 1), 2544.

[13] Cuzick J., Beverley E., Ho L., Terry G., Sapper H., Mielzynska I. et al.: “HPV testing in primary screening of older women”. Br. J. Cancer, 1999, 81, 554.

[14] Runowicz C.D.: “Molecular screening for cervical cancer - time to give up Pap test?”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2007, 357, 1650.

[15] Lorincz A.T., Castle P.E., Sherman M.E., Scott D.R., Glass A.G., Wacholder S. et al.: “Viral load of human papillomavirus and risk of CIN3 or cervical cancer”. Lancet, 2002, 360, 228.

[16] Sherman M.E., Wang S.S., Wheeler C.M., Rich L., Gravitt P.E., Tarone R., Schiffman M.: “Determinants of human papillomavirus load among women with histological cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: dominant impact of surrounding low-grade lesions”. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., 2003, 12, 1038.

[17] Dane C., Batmaz G., Dane B., Cetin A.: “Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion tests: a prospective study”. Ann. Diagn. Pathol., 2009, 13, 73.

[18] Ordi J., Alonso I., Torné A., Esteve R., Sierra E., Campo E., Puig-Tintoré L.M.: “Human papillomavirus load in Hybrid Capture II assay: does increasing the cutoff improve the test?”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 99, 313.

[19] Sargent A., Bailey A., Turner A., Almonte M., Gilham C., Baysson H. et al.: “Optimal threshold for a positive hybrid capture 2 test for detection of human papillomavirus: data from the ARTISTIC trial”. J. Clin. Microbiol., 2010, 48, 554.

[20] Castle P.E., Lorincz A.T., Mielzynska-Lohnas J., Scott D.R., Glass A.G., Sherman M.E. et al.: “Results of human papillomavirus DNA testing with the Hybrid Capture 2 assay are reproducible”. J Clin Microbiol., 2002, 40, 1088.

[21] De Cremoux P., Coste J., Sastre-Garau X., Thioux M., Bouillac C., Labbe S. et al.: “Efficiency of the Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA test in cervical cancer screening. A study by the French Society of Clinical Cytology”. Am J Clin Pathol., 2003, 120, 492.

[22] Jarboe E.A., Venkat P., Hirsch M.S., Cibas E.S., Crum C.P., Garner E.I.: “A weakly positive human papillomavirus Hybrid Capture II result correlates with a significantly lower risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2,3 after atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cytology”. J. Low Genit. Tract. Dis., 2010, 14, 174.

[23] Khan M.J., Castle P.E., Lorincz A.T., Wacholder S., Sherman M., Scott D.R. et al.: “The elevated 10-year risk of cervical precancer and cancer in women with human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 or 18 and the possible utility of type-specific HPV testing in clinical practice”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2005, 97, 1072.

[24] Yoshida T., Sano T., Kanuma T., Inoue H., Itoh T., Yazaki C. et al.: “Usefulness of CINtec PLUS p16/Ki-67 Double-Staining in Cytological Screening of Cervical Cancer”. Acta Cytol., 2011, 55, 413.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top