Article Data

  • Views 240
  • Dowloads 112

Original Research

Open Access

Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy in locally advanced non-squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a retrospective multicenter study of Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit

  • T. Shoji1,*,
  • S. Kumagai1
  • A. Yoshizaki1
  • Y. Yokoyama2
  • T. Fujimoto3
  • T. Takano4
  • N. Yaegashi4
  • K. Nakahara5
  • H. Nishiyama6
  • T. Sugiyama1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan

3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita, Japan

4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Japan

5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan

6Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo201204353 Vol.33,Issue 4,July 2012 pp.353-357

Published: 10 July 2012

*Corresponding Author(s): T. Shoji E-mail: tshoji@iwate-med.ac.jp

Abstract

Objective: Radical hysterectomy (RH) is a standard treatment for locally advanced non-squamous cell carcinoma (N-SCC) of the uterine cervix, but there have been no reports on whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical hysterectomy could improve the outcome of patients with this disease. Materials and Methods: This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 77 patients with Stage IB2 to IIB N-SCC of the uterine cervix. Of these, 27 patients were treated with NAC prior to radical hysterectomy (NAC group) and 50 with RH alone (RH group). The two-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Clinical parameters such as clinical stage, histological type, and postoperative treatment were also examined between the groups. Results: While the two-year RFS rates were 81.5% and 70.0% in NAC and RH groups, respectively (p = 0.27) and the median PFS was 51 months and 35 months in NAC and RH groups, respectively (p = 0.35), the median OS was 58 months and 48 months in NAC and RH groups, respectively, which was significant (p = 0.0014). The median OS of patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma in NAC group was significantly higher than that in RH group: 58 months versus 37 months (p = 0.03). Conclusion: NAC prior to RH may offer the prognostic advantage of patients with locally advanced N-SCC of the uterine cervix, especially mucinous adenocarcinoma.

Keywords

Uterine cervical carcinoma; Non-squamous cell carcinoma; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Radical hysterectomy; Outcome

Cite and Share

T. Shoji,S. Kumagai,A. Yoshizaki,Y. Yokoyama,T. Fujimoto,T. Takano,N. Yaegashi,K. Nakahara,H. Nishiyama,T. Sugiyama. Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy in locally advanced non-squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a retrospective multicenter study of Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012. 33(4);353-357.

References

[1] Whitney C.W., Sause W., Bundy B.N., Malfetano J.H., Hannigan E.V., Fowler W.C. Jr. et al.: “Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in Stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 1999, 17, 1339.

[2] Morris M., Eifel P.J., Lu J., Grigsby P.W., Levenback C., Stevens R.E. et al.: “Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 1999, 340, 1137.

[3] Rose P.G., Bundy B.N., Watkins E.B., Thigpen J.T., Deppe G., Maiman M.A. et al.: “Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 1999, 340, 1144.

[4] Keys H.M., Bundy B.N., Stehman F.B., Muderspach L.I., Chafe W.E., Suggs C.L. 3rd et al.: “Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky Stage 1B cervical carcinoma”. N. Engl. J. Med., 1999, 340, 1154.

[5] Peters W.A. 3rd, Liu P.Y., Barrett R.J. 2nd, Stock R.J., Monk B.J., Berek J.S. et al.: “Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2000, 18, 1606.

[6] Thomas G.M.: “Improved treatment for cervical cancer-concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy”. N. Engl. J. Med., 1999, 340, 1198.

[7] Green J.A., Kirwan J.M., Tierney J.F., Symonds P., Fresco L., Collingwood M. et al.: “Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Lancet, 2001, 358, 781.

[8] Benedetti-Panici P., Greggi S., Colombo A., Amoroso M., Smaniotto D., Giannarelli D. et al.: “Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery versus exclusive radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer: results from the Italian multicenter randomized study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2002, 20, 179.

[9] Nagao S., Fujiwara K., Oda T., Ishikawa H., Koike H., Tanaka H. et al.: “Combination chemotherapy of docetaxel and carboplatin in advanced or recurrent cervix cancer. A pilot study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 96, 805.

[10] Shoji T., Takatori E., Hatayama S., Omi H., Kagabu M., Honda T. et al.: “Phase II Study of Tri-weekly cisplatin and irinotecan as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer”. Oncol. Lett., 2010, 1, 515.

[11] Sardi J.E., Giaroli A., Sananes C., Ferreira M., Soderini A., Bermudez A. et al.: “Long-term follow-up of the first randomized trial using neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Stage Ib squamous carcinoma of the cervix: The final results”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1997, 67, 61.

[12] Serur E., Mathews R.P., Gates J., Levine P., Maiman M., Remy J.C.: “Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB2 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1997, 65, 348.

[13] Shingleton H.M., Gore H., Bradley D.H., Soong H.J.: “Adenocarcinoma of the cervix : I. Clinical evaluation and pathologic features”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1981, 139, 799.

[14] Fu Y.S., Reagan J.W., Hsui J.G., Storaasli J.P., Wemtz W.B.: “Adenocarcinoma and mixed carcinoma of the cervix: A clinicopathologic study”. Cancer, 1982, 49, 2560.

[15] Berek J.S., Hacker N.F., Fu Y., Sokale J.R., Leucher R.C., Lagasse L.D.: “Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: histlogic variables associated with lymph node metastasis and survival”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1985, 65, 46.

[16] Moberg P.J., Einhorn N., Silfverswärd C., Söderberg G.: “Adenocarcinoma of the cervix”. Cancer, 1986, 57, 407.

[17] Tattersall M.H., Lorvidhaya V., Vootiprux V., Cheirsilpa A., Wong F., Azhar T. et al.: “Randomized trial of epirubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiation in locally advanced cervical cancer. Cervical Cancer Study Group of the Asian Oceanian Clinical Oncology Association”. J. Clin. Oncol., 1995, 13, 444.

[18] Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration: “Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient deta from 21 randomized trials”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2003, 39, 2470.

[19] Oguri H., Maeda N., Fukaya T.: “Cervical adenocarcinoma treated with docetaxel and carboplatin”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2003, 83, 209.

[20] Huang X., Lan C., Huang H., Zhang Y., Huang H., Cao X. et al.: “Neoadjuvant docetaxel combined with cisplatin and followed by radical surgery for the treatment of locally advanced (Stage IB2 - IIB) cervical cancer: preliminary results of a single-institution experience”. Expert Opin. Pharmacother., 2011, 12, 165.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top