Article Data

  • Views 230
  • Dowloads 112

Original Research

Open Access

Model for predicting the burden and cost of treatment in cervical cancer and HPV-related diseases in Thailand

  • W. Termrungruanglert1
  • P. HAVANOND2,*,
  • N. Khemapech1
  • S. Lertmaharit2
  • S. Pongpanich2
  • P. Jirakorbchaipong3
  • S. Kitsiripornchai3
  • S. Taneepanichskul1,2

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand

2College of Public Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand

3MSD (Thailand) Ltd, Thailand

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo201204391 Vol.33,Issue 4,July 2012 pp.391-394

Published: 10 July 2012

*Corresponding Author(s): P. HAVANOND E-mail: piyalamporn.h@chula.ac.th

Abstract

Purpose: Cervical cancer is a significant health burden in many countries. Long-term cost of care is still not well understood. We aimed to evaluate the long-term burden of illness and healthcare resource utilization associated with cervical cancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and genital warts from the care provider perspective. Method: We developed a health state-transition Markov model to portray the algorithm of treatment of stages of cervical cancer, CIN and genital warts by tracking a hypothetical lifetime cohort of 12-year-old girls. Costs in this study were unit cost; capital costs and labor costs were included in the unit cost for in-patients and out-patients. Results: The highest incidence of CIN and genital warts was observed in women aged 20-30 years old. For cervical cancer, the highest incidence was 45-55 years. Death rate was estimated at 2%, 8%, 84% and 94% in cervical cancer Stage IA1, IA2-IIA, I and IVB, respectively. The estimated mean direct cost per patient with cervical cancer Stage IA1, IA2-IIA, IIB-IVA, IVB, CIN1, CIN2/3 and genital warts were 41,117 Thai Baht ($1,277 US), 97,250 Thai Baht ($3,020 US), 402,683 Thai Baht ($12,506 US), 322,619 Thai Baht ($10,019 US), 5,381 Thai Baht ($167 US), 49,933 Thai Baht ($1.551 US) and 3,585 Thai Baht ($111 US), respectively. Cost for survival or death case was indifferent. The overall lifetime costs from the provider perspective were evaluated at 859.1 million Baht ($26.7 million US) per a cohort of 100,000 women which corresponds to approximately 4,244 million Baht ($131.8 million US) for the current number of Thai 12-year-old girls. Conclusions: HPV-related diseases impose health and cost burdens in Thailand. The national immunization programme to reduce this burden as well as further research to evaluate the impact is keenly expected.

Keywords

Cost; Cervical cancer; HPV-related diseases

Cite and Share

W. Termrungruanglert,P. HAVANOND,N. Khemapech,S. Lertmaharit,S. Pongpanich,P. Jirakorbchaipong,S. Kitsiripornchai,S. Taneepanichskul. Model for predicting the burden and cost of treatment in cervical cancer and HPV-related diseases in Thailand. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012. 33(4);391-394.

References

[1] Parkin D.M.: “Cancer in developing countries”. Cancer Surv., 1994, 19, 519.

[2] Parkin D.M., Pisani P., Ferlay J.: “Estimates of the worldwide incidence of 25 major cancers in 1990”. Int. J. Cancer, 1999, 80, 827.

[3] Pisani P., Parkin D.M., Ferlay J.: “Estimates of the worldwide mortality from eighteen major cancers in 1985. Implications for prevention and projections of future burden”. Int. J. Cancer, 1993, 55, 891.

[4] Quinn M.J., Cooper N., Rachet B., Mitry E., Woods L.M., Coleman M.P.: “Survival from cancer of the uterine cervix in England and Wales up to 2001”. Br. J. Cancer, 2008, 99 (suppl. 1), S59.

[5] Thomas G.: “Cervical cancer: treatment challenges in the developing world”. Radiother. Oncol., 2006, 79, 139.

[6] Chichareon S.B.: “Cervical cancer incidence in the south of Thailand 1988-1989”. J. Med. Assoc. Thai, 1993, 76, 146.

[7] Deerasamee S., Srivatanakul P.: “Cervix uteri”. In: Deerasamee S., Martin N., Sontipong S., Sriamporn S. et al. (eds.). Cancer in Thailand 1992-1994, Vol. II. Lyon: IARC Technical report no. 34, 1999, 56.

[8] Pengsaa P., Jindawijak S.: “Cervix uteri”. In: Sriplung H, Sontipong S, Martin N. et al. (eds.). Cancer in Thailand vol III. National Cancer Institute of Thailand, 1997.

[9] Sriplung H.: “Projection of cancer problems”. In: Khuhaprema T., Srivatanakul P., Sriplung H. et al. (eds.). Cancer in Thailand vol. IV. National Cancer Institute of Thailand, 2008.

[10] Srivatanakul P.: “Cervix uteri”. In: Khuhaprema T., Srivatanakul P., Sriplung H. et al. (eds.). Cancer in Thailand vol IV. National Cancer institute of Thailand, 2000, 51.

[11] Bosch F.X., Manos M.M., Munoz N., Sherman M., Jansen A.M., Peto J. et al.: “Prevalence of human papillomavirus in cervical cancer: a worldwide perspective. International biological study on cervical cancer (IBSCC) Study Group”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 1995, 87, 796.

[12] Lertworapreecha M., Bhattarakosol P., Niruthisard S.: “Detection and typing of human papillomavirus in cervical intraepitherial neoplasia (CIN) grade III by PCR and dot hybridization”. Southeast Asian. J. Trop. Med. Public Health, 1998, 29, 507.

[13] Munoz N., Bosch F.X.: “HPV and cervical neoplasia: review of case-control and cohort studies”. IARC Sci. Publ., 1992, 251.

[14] Walboomers J.M., Jacobs M.V., Manos M.M., Bosch F.X., Kummer J.A., Shah K.V. et al.: “Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide”. J. Pathol., 1999, 189, 12.

[15] Wilailak S.: “Epidemiologic report of gynecologic cancer in Thailand”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 20, 81.

[16] Breitburd F., Coursaget P.: “Human papillomavirus vaccines”. Semin. Cancer Biol., 1999, 9, 431.

[17] Burchell A.N., Richardson H., Mahmud S.M., Trottier H., Tellier P.P., Hanley J. et al.: “Modeling the sexual transmissibility of human papillomavirus infection using stochastic computer simulation and empirical data from a cohort study of young women in Montreal, Canada”. Am. J. Epidemiol., 2006, 163, 534.

[18] Cantor S.B., Fahs M.C., Mandelblatt J.S., Myers E.R., Sanders G.D.: “Decision science and cervical cancer”. Cancer, 2003, 98, 2003.

[19] Goldie S.J., Weinstein M.C., Kuntz K.M., Freedberg K.A.: “The costs, clinical benefits, and cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in HIV-infected women”. Ann. Intern. Med., 1999, 130, 97.

[20] Goldie S.J., Kohli M., Grima D., Weinstein M.C., Wright T.C., Bosch F.X. et al.: “Projected clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of a human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2004, 96, 604.

[21] Kim J.J., Wright T.C., Goldie S.J.: “Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance”. JAMA, 2002, 287, 2382.

[22] Kulasingam S.L., Myers E.R.: “Potential health and economic impact of adding a human papillomavirus vaccine to screening programs”. JAMA, 2003, 290, 781.

[23] Mandelblatt J.S., Lawrence W.F., Womack S.M., Jacobson D., Yi B., Hwang Y.T. et al.: “Benefits and costs of using HPV testing to screen for cervical cancer”. JAMA, 2002, 287, 2372.

[24] Mandelblatt J.S., Lawrence W.F., Gaffikin L., Limpahayom K.K., Lumbiganon P., Warakamin S. et al.: “Costs and benefits of different strategies to screen for cervical cancer in less-developed countries”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2002, 94, 1469.

[25] Myers E.R., McCrory D.C., Nanda K., Bastian L., Matchar D.B.: “Mathematical model for the natural history of human papillomavirus infection and cervical carcinogenesis”. Am. J. Epidemiol., 2000, 151, 1158.

[26] Sanders G.D., Taira A.V.: “Cost-effectiveness of a potential vaccine for human papillomavirus”. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 2003, 9, 37.

[27] Taira A.V., Neukermans C.P., Sanders G.D.: “Evaluating human papillomavirus vaccination programs”. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 2004, 10, 1915.

[28] Arveux P., Benard S., Bouee S., Lafuma A., Martin L., Cravello L. et al.: “Invasive cervical cancer treatment costs in France”. Bull. Cancer, 2007, 94, 219.

[29] Hillemanns P., Breugelmans J.G., Gieseking F., Benard S., Lamure E., Littlewood K.J. et al.: “Estimation of the incidence of genital warts and the cost of illness in Germany: a cross-sectional study”. BMC Infect. Dis., 2008, 8, 76.

[30] Insinga R.P., Dasbach E.J., Myers E.R.: “The health and economic burden of genital warts in a set of private health plans in the United States”. Clin. Infect. Dis., 2003, 36, 1397.

[31] Pirotta M., Stein A.N., Conway E.L., Harrison C., Britt H., Garland S.: “Genital Warts Incidence and Health Care Resource Utilisation in Australia”. Sex Transm. Infect., 2009.

[32] Ricciardi A., Largeron N., Giorgi R.P., Raffaele M., Cohet C., Federici A. et al.: “Incidence of invasive cervical cancer and direct costs associated with its management in Italy”. Tumori, 2009, 95, 146.

[33] Manusirivithaya S., Sripramote M., Tangjitgamol S., Sanjareonsuttikul N., Pisarnturakit P.: “Cost effectiveness of concurrent chemoradiation in comparison with radiation alone in locally advanced cervical cancer”. J. Med. Assoc. Thai., 2005, 88, 1035.

[34] Doubilet P., Begg C.B., Weinstein M.C., Braun P., McNeil B.J.: “Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. A practical approach”. Med. Decis. Making, 1985, 5, 157.

[35] Sonnenber F.A., Beck J.R.: “Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide”. Med. Decision Making, 1993, 13, 322.

[36] Prasartkul P., Rakchanyaban U.: “Estimation generation life tables for Thailand of five-year birth cohorts: 1900-2000”. Bangkok, Thailand: Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University, 2002.

[37] Insinga R.P., Glass A.G., Rush B.B.: “Diagnoses and outcomes in cervical cancer screening: a population-based study”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2004, 191, 105.

[38] Tanapat Y., Sungkawasi K., Tatanan K., Buranavit K., Chaiprapa C., Takarnjanavanit S. et al.: “Cervical Cancer Survival at Pramongkutklao Hospital”. Royal Thai Army Med. J.,1995, 48, 21.

[39] Srisupundit S., Kraiphibul P., Tangtrakul S., Bhamarapravati Y:. “Cervical Cancer Survival at Ramathibodi Hospital 1979-1983”. J. Med. Assoc. Thai., 1990, 73 (suppl. 1), 15.

[40] Pengsaa P., Udomthavornsak B., Hemfling A.: “Prognostic factors for survival after surgery for early stages cervical cancer”. Thai J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1990, 2, 29.

[41] Kongthanarat Y.: “Five year results of radiation therapy and radiation therapy with concomitant high dose Mitomycin-C in the treatment of the uterine cervix”. J. Rajavithi Hosp., 1996, 7, 25.

[42] Zighelboim I., Taylor N.P., Powell M.A., Gibb R.K., Rader J.S., Mutch D.G. et al.: “Outcomes in 24 selected patients with stage IVB cervical cancer and excellent performance status treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy”. Radiat. Med., 2006, 24, 625.

[43] Harper D.M., Franco E.L., Wheeler C.M., Moscicki A.B., Romanowski B., Roteli-Martins C.M. et al.: “Sustained efficacy up to 4.5 years of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine against human papillomavirus types 16 and 18: follow-up from a randomised control trial”. Lancet, 2006, 367, 1247.

[44] Mao C., Koutsky L.A., Ault K.A., Wheeler C.M., Brown D.R., Wiley D.J. et al.: “Efficacy of human papillomavirus-16 vaccine to prevent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2006, 107, 18.

[45] Villa L.L., Costa R.L., Petta C.A., Andrade R.P., Ault K.A., Giuliano A.R. et al.: “Prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine in young women: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre phase II efficacy trial”. Lancet Oncol., 2005, 6, 271.

[46] Rossi P.G., Ricciardi A., Cohet C., Palazzo F., Furnari G., Valle S. et al.: “Epidemiology and cost of cervical cancer screening and cervical dysplasia in Italy”. BMC Public Health, 2009, 9, 71.

[47] Lachance J.A., Darus C.J., Stukenborg G.J., Schneider B.F., Rice L.W., Jazaeri A.A.: “A cost comparison of two strategies for treating Stage IB2 cervical cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2008, 18, 274.

[48] National Statistical Office of Thailand: Household income, expenditure and debt. Thailand, 2007.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top