Article Data

  • Views 243
  • Dowloads 112

Original Research

Open Access

Labeling of microvessel density, lymphatic vessel density and potential role of proangiogenic and lymphangiogenic factors as a predictive/prognostic factors after radiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer

  • M. Biedka1,2,*,
  • R. Makarewicz1,3
  • A. Marszałek4,5
  • J. Sir6
  • H. Kardymowicz7
  • A. Goralewska7

1Clinic of Oncology and Brachytherapy, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun´, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Poland

2Radiotherapy Department I, Oncology Centre in Bydgoszcz, Poland

3Brachytherapy Department, Oncology Centre in Bydgoszcz, Poland

4Brachytherapy Department, Oncology Centre in Bydgoszcz, Poland

5Department of Clinical Pathomorphology, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz of Nicolus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland

6General Practice, BydgoszczGeneral Practice, Bydgoszcz, Poland

7Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Oncology Centre in Bydgoszcz, Poland

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo201204399 Vol.33,Issue 4,July 2012 pp.399-405

Published: 10 July 2012

*Corresponding Author(s): M. Biedka E-mail: martabiedka@tlen.pl

Abstract

Introduction: Angiogenesis, formation of a new blood vessel from the existing vascular network, is essential for tumor growth, progression and metastasis. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been identified to be one of the most important factors of angiogenesis. VEGF-C, a novel member of the family, is a relatively specific lymphangiogenic growth factor. It is tempting to suggest that cervical cancer is one of the most common malignancies in a woman's life. Its prognostic factors are tumor stage, lymph node status, histologic type, level of hemoglobin. However, little is known about prognostic or/and predictive significance of angiogenesis in cervical cancer. Objective: This prospective study is an attempt to evaluate serum VEGF-A, VEGF-C, microvessel density (MVD), and lymphatic vessel density (LMVD) in cervical cancer and the correlations with clinicopathologic features. Material and Methods: Blood samples were collected from 58 patients affected by FIGO I-IV stage cervical cancer, who were admitted to the Department of Oncology and Brachytherapy Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz of Nicolaus Copernicus University. Serum VEGF-A/VEGF-C concentrate was determined by means of a quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay (ELISA). All tumor samples were taken from cross section during the first brachytherapy. Then they were examined by immunohistochemical studies with podoplanin antibody and anti-CD31 antibody. The present analysis was used to evaluate MVD and LMVD. Results: The median serum VEGF-A was 734.76 pg/ml (range from 86.39 pg/ml - 2200.00 pg/ml), and VEGF-A was only correlated with after treatment hemoglobin concentration (p = 0.046, R = -0.3450). The median serum VEGF-C was 145.72 pg/ml (range 131.08 -233.60 pg/ml). Serum VEGF-C levels measured in patients were associated with primary tumor size. We observed significantly higher serum VEGF-C in localized disease (FIGO I, II) in comparison to advanced tumors (232.44 pg/ml vs 152.45 pg/ml; p = 0.034). The median LMVD was 6.25 (range 3.5-10.0) and median blood vessel density was 12.5 (range 9.5-23.0). We found significantly higher lymphatic vessel density in patients with G1/G2 grade of differentiation than in those with G3 (9.93 vs 6.25; p = 0.0398). We observed a statistically significant correlation between MVD and LMVD; (p = 0.032). Conclusion: In conclusion, our study suggests that serum VEGF-A, VEGF-C, LMVD and MVD play an important role in tumor growth and progression in cervical cancer. Nonetheless, further studies are essential to explore the underlying mechanism.

Keywords

Cervical cancer; Angiogenesis; VEGF; Microvessel density

Cite and Share

M. Biedka,R. Makarewicz,A. Marszałek,J. Sir,H. Kardymowicz,A. Goralewska. Labeling of microvessel density, lymphatic vessel density and potential role of proangiogenic and lymphangiogenic factors as a predictive/prognostic factors after radiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012. 33(4);399-405.

References

[1] Didkowska J.: “Nowotwory szyjki macicy w Polsce - epidemiologiczny bilans otwarcia i perspektywy”. Ginekol. Pol., 2006, 8, 660.

[2] Terlikowski S., Len´czewska A., Miron´czuk J., Łotocki W.: “Analiza kliniczna kobiet z rakiem szyjki macicy leczonych w latach 1989-1994”. Ginekol. Pol., 1996, 67, 144.

[3] Ochi T., Murase K., Fujii T., Kawamura M., Ikezoe J.: “Survival prediction using artificial neural networks in patients with uterine cervical cancer treated by radiation therapy alone”. Int. J. Clin. Oncol., 2002, 7, 294.

[4] Choi J.H., Kim H.C., Lim H.Y., Nam D.K., Kim H.S., Yi J.W. et al.: “Vascular endothelial growth factor in the serum of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: correlation with platelet and leukocyte counts”. Lung Cancer, 2001, 33, 171.

[5] Lambin P., Kramar A., Haie-Meder C., Castaigne D., Scalliet P., Bouzy J. et al.: “Tumour size in cancer of the cervix”. Acta Oncol., 1998, 37, 729.

[6] Conway E., Collen D., Carmeliet P.: “Molecular mechanism of blood vessel growth”. Cardiovasc. Res., 2001, 49, 507.

[7] Drake C., La Rue A., Ferrara N.: “VEGF regulates cell behavior during vasculogenesis”. Dev. Biol., 2000, 224, 178.

[8] Nagy J., Dvorak A., Dvorak H.: “VEGF164/165 – and PIGF roles in angiogenesis and arteriogenesis”. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2003, 13, 164.

[9] Ferrara N.: “Molecular and biological properties of vascular endothelial growth factor”. J. Mol. Med., 1999, 77, 527.

[10] Gisterek I., Sedlaczek P., Kornafel J., Harlozin˜ska-Szmyrka A., Lacko A.: “Serum vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with pharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy”. Am. J. Otolaryng., 2007, 28, 73.

[11] Duff S., Saundersy M., McCrediey V., Kumarz S., O’Dwyer S., Jaysonx G.: “Pre-operative plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor A, C and D in patients with colorectal cancer”. Clin. Oncol., 2005, 17, 367.

[12] Vermeulen P., Gasparini G., Fox S., Colpaert C., Marson L.P., Gion M. et al.: “Second international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluaton of angiogenesis quantification in solid human tumors”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2002, 38, 1564.

[13] Wynendaele W., Derua R., Hoylaerts M., Pawinski A., Waelkenz E., de Bruijn E.A. et al.: “Vascular endothelial growth factor measured in platelet poor plasma allows optimal separation between cancer patients and volunteers: A key to study an angiogenic marker in vivo?”. Ann. Oncol., 1999, 10, 965.

[14] Gasparini G.: “Clinical significance of determination of surrogate markers of angiogenesis in breast cancer”. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol., 2001, 37, 97.

[15] Mathur S., Mathur R., Elizabeth A., Gray E., Lane D., Underwood P. et al.: “Serum vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) as a specific biomarker for advanced cervical cancer: Relationship to insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II), IGF binding protein 3 (IGF-BP3) and VEGF-B”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 98, 467.

[16] Schoppmann S., Birner P., Stóckl J., Kalt R., Ulrich R., Caucig C. et al.: “Tumor-associated macrophages express lymphatic endothelial growth factor and are related to peritumoral lymphangiogenesis”. Am. J. Pathol., 2002, 161, 947.

[17] Krzystek-Korpacka M., Matusiewicz M., Diakowska D., Grabowski K., Blachut K., Banas T.: “Up-regulation of VEGF-C secreted by cancer cells and not VEGF-A correlates with clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)”. Cancer Lett., 2007, 249, 171.

[18] Saharinen P., Tammela T., Karkkainen M., Alitalo K.: “Lymphatic vasculature: development, molecular regulation and role in tumor metastasis and inflammation”. Trends Immunol., 2004, 25, 387.

[19] Cox G., Walker R., Andi A., Steward W., O’Byrne K.: “Prognostic significance of platelet and microvessel counts in operable nonsmall cell lung cancer”. Lung Cancer, 2000, 29, 169.

[20] O’Byrne K., Dobbs N., Propper D., Smith K., Harris A.: “Vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet counts, and prognosis in renal cancer”. Lancet, 1999, 353, 1494.

[21] Mitsuhashi A., Suzuka K., Yamazawa K., Matsui H., Seki K., Sekiya S.: “Serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF-C levels as tumor markers in patients with cervical carcinoma”. Cancer, 2005, 103, 724.

[22] George D.J., Regan M.M., Oh W.K., Tay M.H., Manola J., Decalo N. et al.: “Radical prostatectomy lowers plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels in patients with prostate cancer”. Urology, 2004, 63, 327.

[23] Ohta M., Konno H., Tanaka T., Baba M., Kamiya K., Syouji T. et al.: “The significance of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) protein in gastric cancer”. Cancer Lett., 2003, 192, 215.

[24] Vermeulen P., Gasparini G., Fox S., Toi M., Martin L., McCulloch P. et al.: “Quantification of angiogenesis solid human tumours an: international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation”. Eur. J. Cancer, 1996, 14, 2474.

[25] Lebrecht A., Ludwig E., Huber A., Klein M., Schneeberger C., Tempfer C. “Serum vascular endothelial growth factor and serum leptin in patients with cervical cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2002, 85, 32.

[26] Bachtiary B., Selzer E., Knocke T., Pooter R., Obermair A.: “Serum VEGF levels in patients undergoing primary radiotherapy for cervical cancer: impact on progression-free survival”. Cancer Lett., 2002, 179, 197.

[27] Broll R., Erdmann H., Duchrow M., Oevemann E., Schwandner O., Markert U. et al.: “Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) a valuable serum tumour marker in patients with colorectal cancer”. Eur. J. Sur. Oncol., 2001, 27, 34.

[28] Kaya A., Ciledag A., Gulbay B.E., Poyraz B.M., Celik G., Sen E. et al.: “The prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor levels in sera of non-small cell lung cancer patients”. Respir. Med., 2004, 98, 632.

[29] Thiele T., Sleeman J.: “Tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis: A target for cancer therapy?”. J. Biotechnol., 2006, 124, 224.

[30] Longatto-Filho A., Pinheiro C., Pereira S., Etlinger D., Moreíra M.A., Jubé L.F. et al.: “Lymphatic vessel density and epithelial D2-40 immunoreactivity in pre-invasive and invasive lesions of the uterine cervix”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 107, 45.

[31] Obermair, Wanner C., Selcuk B.: “Tumor angiogenesis in Stage IB cervical cancer: correlation of microvessel density with survival”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1998, 178, 314.

[32] Wiggins D., Granai C., Steinhoff M., Calabresi P.: “Tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic factor in cervical carcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1995, 56, 353.

[33] Zaghloul M., Naggar M., Deeb A., Khaled H., Mokhtar N.: “Prognostic implication of apoptosis and angiogenesis in cervical uteri cancer”. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2000, 48, 1409.

[34] Dunst J., Kuhnt T., Strauss H., Krause U., Pelz T, Koelbl H, Haensgen G.: “Anemia in cervical cancer: Impact on survival, patterns of relapse and association with hypoxia and angiogenesis”. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2003, 56, 778.

[35] Li C., Shintani S., Terakado N., Klosek S.K., Ishikawa T., Nakashiro K., Hamakawa H.: “Microvessel density and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, Basic fibroblast growth factor, and platelet- derived endothelial growth factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;34:559-565.

[36] Dobbs S., Brown L., Ireland D., Abrahms K.R., Murray J.C., Gatter K. et al.: “Platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor expression and angiogenesis in cervical intraepithelial neoplasis and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix”. Ann. Diagn. Pathol., 2000, 4, 286.

[37] Valencaka J., Heere- Ressa E., Koppa T., Schoppmann S., Kittlera H., Pehambergera H.: “Selective immunohistochemical staining shows significant prognostic influence of lymphatic and blood vessels in patients with malignant melanoma”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2004, 40, 358.

[38] Gasin´ska A., Urban´ski K., Adamczyk A.: “Prognostic signifcance of intratumour microvessel density and haemoglobin level in carcinoma of the uterine cervix”. Acta Oncol., 2002, 41, 437.

[39] Gao P., Zhou G.Y., Yin G., Liu Y., Liu Z.Y., Zhang J., Hao C.Y.: “Lymphatic vessel density as a prognostic indicator for patients with Stage I cervical carcinoma”. Hum. Pathol., 2006, 37, 719.

[40] Ferrero A., Zola P., Mazzola S.: “Pretreatment serum hemoglobin level and a preliminary investigation of intratumoral microvessel density in advanced ovarian cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 95, 323.

[41] Van Trappen P., Pepper M.: “Lymphangiogenesis and Lymph node microdissemination”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2001, 82, 1.

[42] Horn L., Fischer U., Raptis G., Bilek K., Hentschel B.: “Tumor size is of prognostic value in surgically treated FIGO Stage II cervical cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 107, 310.

[43] Tamura M., Oda M., Tsunezuka Y., Matsumoto I., Kawakami K., Ohta Y., Watanabe G.: “Chest CT and serum vascular endothelial growth factor-C level to diagnose lymph node metastasis in patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer”. Chest, 2004, 126, 342.

[44] Kodama J., Seki N., Ojima Y., Nakamura K., Hongo A., Hiramatsu Y.: “Prognostic factors in node-positive patients with Stage IB-IIB cervical cancer treated by radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy”. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet., 2006, 93, 130.

[45] Ming S., Xinbo X., Jiaqing Q., Renyi Q.: “Relationship between the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor C and lymphangiogenesis in human pancreatic cancer”. Chinese-German J. Clin. Oncol., 2006, 4, 96.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top