Article Data

  • Views 1305
  • Dowloads 102

Original Research

Open Access

Comparison of outcomes in patients treated with multi-agent regiments of cisplatin, adriamycin, and VP-16 versus carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer

  • A.B. Olawaiye1
  • H.E. Godoy2
  • M.M.K. Shahzad3
  • J.A. Rauh-Hain4
  • S. LELE2,*,
  • K. Odunsi2,5

1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh/Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, NY, USA

2Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA

3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, NY, USA

4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, NY, USA

5Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo201205477 Vol.33,Issue 5,September 2012 pp.477-479

Published: 10 September 2012

*Corresponding Author(s): S. LELE E-mail: shashi.lele@roswellpark.org

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of two multi-agent chemotherapeutic regiments that were previously used at the Institution for treatment of advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with Stage III, IV, and recurrent endometrial cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy at Roswell Park Cancer Institute over a period of 21 years. Two patient groups were defined based on treatment received: cisplatin, adriamycin, and VP-16 with or without megace (PAV-M), or carboplatin and paclitaxel (CT). Results: Forty-two patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer were included in this review based on regimen received. Median duration of follow up was 55 months. Treatment with PAV-M resulted in more dose modifications compared to CT group (42% vs 11%, respectively). There were no significant differences in disease-free survival or overall survival. Conclusions: PAV/PAV-M is active in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. However, toxicity associated with this triplet regimen may limit clinical use.

Keywords

Advanced endometrial carcinoma; Multi-agent chemotherapies; Adriamycin; Cisplatin; Etoposide

Cite and Share

A.B. Olawaiye,H.E. Godoy,M.M.K. Shahzad,J.A. Rauh-Hain,S. LELE,K. Odunsi. Comparison of outcomes in patients treated with multi-agent regiments of cisplatin, adriamycin, and VP-16 versus carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012. 33(5);477-479.

References

[1] Fleming G.F., Brunetto V.L., Cella D., Look K.Y., Reid G.C., Munkarah A.R. et al.: “Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus cisplatin with or without paclitaxel plus filgrastim in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2004, 22, 2159.

[2] Akram T., Maseelall P., Fanning J.: “Carboplatin and paclitaxel for the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2005, 192, 1365.

[3] Hoskins P.J., Swenerton K.D., Pike J.A., Wong F., Lim P., Acquino-Parsons C. et al.: “Paclitaxel and carboplatin, alone or with irradiation, in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a phase II study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2001, 19, 4048.

[4] Michener C.M., Peterson G., Kulp B., Webster K.D., Markman M.: “Carboplatin plus paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma”. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., 2005, 131, 581.

[5] Kelley R.M., Baker W.H.: “Progestational agents in the treatment of carcinoma of the endometrium”. N. Engl. J. Med., 1961, 264, 216.

[6] Lentz S.S., Brady M.F., Major F.J., Reid G.C., Soper J.T.: “Highdose megestrol acetate in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 1996, 14, 357.

[7] Thigpen J.T., Brady M.F., Alvarez R.D., Adelson M.D., Homesley H.D., Manetta A. et al.: “Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a doseresponse study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group”. J. Clin. Oncol., 1999, 17, 1736.

[8] Thigpen T., Brady M.F., Homesley H.D., Soper J.T., Bell J.: “Tamoxifen in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2001, 19, 364.

[9] Whitney C.W., Brunetto V.L., Zaino R.J., Lentz S.S., Sorosky J., Armstrong D.K. et al.: “Phase II study of medroxyprogesterone acetate plus tamoxifen in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 92, 4.

[10] Ozols R.F., Bundy B.N., Greer B.E., Fowler J.M., Clarke-Pearson D., Burger R.A. et al.: “Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected Stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2003, 21, 3194.

[11] Piccart M.J., Stuart G.C., Cassidy J., Bertelsen K., Parmar M.K., Eisenhauer E.A. et al.: “Intergroup collaboration in ovarian cancer: a giant step forward”. Ann. Oncol., 1999, 10 (suppl. 1), 83.

[12] Price F.V., Edwards R.P., Kelley J.L., Kunschner A.J., Hart L.A.: “A trial of outpatient paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced, recurrent, and histologic high-risk endometrial carcinoma: preliminary report”. Semin. Oncol., 1997, 24 (5 suppl. 15), S15-78.

[13] Nakamura T., Onishi Y., Yamamoto F., Kouno S., Maeda Y., Hatae M.: “Evaluation of paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with endometrial cancer”. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 2000, 27, 257.

[14] Cornelison T.L., Baker T.R., Piver M.S., Driscoll D.L.: “Cisplatin, adriamycin, etoposide, megestrol acetate versus melphalan, 5-fluorouracil, medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of endometrial carcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1995, 59, 243.

[15] Piver, M.S., Fanning J., Baker T.R. Phase II trial of cisplatin, adriamycin, and etoposide for metastatic endometrial adenocarcinoma”. Am. J. Clin. Oncol., 1991, 14, 200.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top