Article Data

  • Views 257
  • Dowloads 135

Original Research

Open Access

Prognostic factors determining recurrence in early-stage endometrial cancer

  • S. Misirlioglu1
  • A.B. Guzel1,*,
  • U.K. Gulec1
  • D. Gumurdulu2
  • M.A. Vardar1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey

2Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo201206610 Vol.33,Issue 6,November 2012 pp.610-614

Published: 10 November 2012

*Corresponding Author(s): A.B. Guzel E-mail: abguzel@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the clinically important prognostic factors for loco-regional or distant recurrence in early-stage endometrial cancer. Materials and Methods: This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the local ethics committee approved the study: Cases who underwent primary surgery of early-stage endometrial cancer at the Institution from 2000 to 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients who did not detect recurrence were classified as group 1 (n = 200); those who detected recurrence were classified as group 2 (n = 23). Clinically prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate analyses. Results: The average age for group 2 (LUSI) was 63.8 years (p = 0.0001). Patients with grade 3 histology were all detected within group 2 (p = 0.0001). Endometrioid adenocarcinoma displaying squamous differentiation was found with a rate of 58.3% in group 2 (p = 0.0001). Lower uterine segment involvement (LUSI) and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) rates were 86.9% in group 2 (p = 0.0001). The rate of tumor size > 2 cm was 56.6% in group 2 (p = 0.0001). The median depth of myometrial invasion (DMI) was 5.1 mm (p = 0.034) and the average in myometrial thickness was 14.5 mm in group H (p = 0.0001). The percentage of myometrial invasion was 35.8% in Group II (p = 0.0001). Tumor free-distance was 9.4 mm in group II (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Age and clinicopathological parameters of the tumours are significant predictors for recurrence in early-stage endometrial cancer.

Keywords

Early-stage endometrial cancer; Prognostic factors; Recurrence

Cite and Share

S. Misirlioglu,A.B. Guzel,U.K. Gulec,D. Gumurdulu,M.A. Vardar. Prognostic factors determining recurrence in early-stage endometrial cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012. 33(6);610-614.

References

[1] Jemal A., Siegel R., Xu J., Ward E.: CA Cancer J. Clin., 2011, 61, 133.

[2] American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2010 [Internet]. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society;©2011 [cited2011, Feb20]. Availablefrom:http://www.cancer.org/Research/Cancer-FactsFigures/CancerFactsFigures/ cancer-facts-and-figures-2010.

[3] Keller D., Kempson R.L., Levine G. et al.: “Management of the patient with early endometrial carcinoma”. Cancer, 1974, 33, 1108.

[4] Jeong N.H., Lee J.M., Lee S.K.: “Current status in the management of uterine corpus cancer in Korea”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, 21, 151.

[5] Salani R., Nagel C.I., Drennen E., Bristow R.E.: “Recurrence patterns and surveillance for patients with early stage endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 123, 205.

[6] Otsuka I., Uno M., Wakabayashi A., Kameda S., Udagawa H., Kubota T.: “Predictive factors for prolonged survival in recurrent endometrial carcinoma: Implications for follow-up protocol”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, 119, 506.

[7] Prat J.: “Prognostic parameters of endometrial carcinoma”. Hum. Pathol., 2004, 35, 649.

[8] Fung-Kee-Fung M., Dodge J., Elit L., Lukka H., Chambers A., Oliver T.: “Follow-up after primary therapy for endometrial cancer: a systematic review”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 101, 520.

[9] van Wijk F.H., van der Burg M.E., Burger C.W. et al.: “Management of recurrent endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: an overview”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2009, 19, 314.

[10] Fujimoto T., Nanjyo H., Fukuda J. et al.. “Endometrioid uterine cancer: histopathological risk factors of local and distant recurrence”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 112, 342.

[11] Mariani A., Webb M.J., Keeney G.L. et al.: “Surgical Stage I endometrial cancer: predictors of distant failure and death”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2002, 87, 274.

[12] Creutzberg C.L., van Putten W.L., Koper P.C. et al.: “Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with Stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC Study Group. Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma”. Lancet, 2000, 355, 1404.

[13] Creutzberg C.L., van Putten W.L., Koper P.C. et al.: “Survival after relapse in patients with endometrial cancer: results from a randomized trial”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2003, 89, 201.

[14] Keys H.M., Roberts J.A., Brunetto V.L. et al.: “A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 92, 744.

[15] Morrow C.P., Bundy B.N., Kurman R.J. et al.: “Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical Stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1991, 40, 55.

[16] Descamps P., Calais G., Moire C., Bertrand P., Castiel M., Le F.O. et al.: “Predictors of distant recurrence in clinical Stage I or II endometrial carcinoma treated by combination surgical and radiation therapy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1997, 64, 548.

[17] Kuten A., Grigsby P.W., Perez C.A., Fineberg B., Garcia D.M., Simpson J.R.: “Results of radiotherapy in recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 51 patients”. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 1989, 17, 29.

[18] Zusterzeel P.L., Bekkers R.L., Hendriks J.C., Neesham D.N., Rome R.M., Quinn M.A.: “Prognostic factors for recurrence in patients with FIGO Stage I and Prognostic factors for recurrence in patients with FIGO Stage I and II, intermediate or high risk endometrial cancer”. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 2008, 87, 240.

[19] Mundt A.J., Waggoner S., Yamada D., Rotmensch J., Connell P.P.: “Age as a prognostic factor for recurrence in patients with endometrial carcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 79, 79.

[20] Zaino R.J., Kurman R.J., Diana K.L., Morrow C.P.: “Pathologic models to predict outcome for women with endometrial adenocarcinoma: the importance of the distinction between surgical stage and clinical stage a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Cancer, 1996, 77, 1115.

[21] Kwon J.S., Carey M.S., Cook E.F., Qiu F., Paszat L.: “Patterns of practice and outcomes in intermediate- and high-risk Stage I and II endometrial cancer: a population-based study”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2007, 17, 433.

[22] Lavie O., Uriev L., Gdalevich M., Barak F., Peer G., Auslender R., Anteby E., Gemer O.: “The outcome of patients with Stage I endometrial cancer involving the lower uterine segment”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2008, 18, 1079.

[23] Gemer O., Gdalevich M., Voldarsky M., Barak F., Ben Arie A., Schneider D., Levy T., Anteby E.Y., Lavie O.: “Lower uterine segment involvement is associated with adverse outcome in patients with stage I endometroid endometrial cancer: results of a multicenter study”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2009, 35, 865.

[24] Gemer O., Arie A.B., Levy T., Gdalevich M., Lorian M., Barak F., Anteby E., Lavie O.: “Lymphvascular space involvement compromises the survival of patients with Stage I endometrial cancer: Results of a multicenter study”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2007, 33, 644.

[25] Briët J.M., Hollema H., Reesink N., Aalders J.G., Mourits M.J., ten Hoor K.A. et al.: “Lymphovascular space involvement: An independent prognostic factor in endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 96, 799.

[26] Cheewakriangkrai C., Panggid K., Siriaungkul S., Khunamornpong S., Suprasert P., Srisomboon J.: “Lymphovascular space invasion as a prognostic determinant in uterine cancer”. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2007, 8, 363.

[27] Shah C., Johnson E.B., Everett E., Tamimi H., Greer B., Swisher E. et al.: “Does size matter? Tumor size and morphology as predictors of nodal status and recurrence in endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 99, 564.

[28] Lindauer J., Fowler J.M., Manolitsas T.P., Copeland L.J., Eaton L.A., Ramirez N.C. et al.: “Is there a prognostic difference between depth of myometrial invasion and the tumor-free distance from the uterine serosa in endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2003, 91, 547.

[29] Schwab K.V., O’Malley D.M., Fowler J.M., Copeland L.J., Cohn D.E.: “Prospective evaluation of prognostic significance of the tumor-free distance from uterine serosa in surgically staged endometrial adenocarcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 112, 146.

[30] Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S., van Vugt S., Sanday K., Nicklin J., Land R., Perrin L. et al.: “Evaluation of tumor-free distance and depth of myometrial invasion as prognostic factors for lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2010, 20, 1217.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top