Article Data

  • Views 232
  • Dowloads 103

Original Research

Open Access

A retrospective analysis of endometrial carcinoma cases surgically treated with or without para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy

  • M. Okazawa1
  • Y. Ueda1,*,
  • T. Enomoto2
  • K. Yoshino2
  • K. Kono2
  • S. Mabuchi2
  • T. Kimura2
  • M. Nagamatsu1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaizuka City Hospital, Hori, Kaiduka, Osaka, Japan

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo201206620 Vol.33,Issue 6,November 2012 pp.620-624

Published: 10 November 2012

*Corresponding Author(s): Y. Ueda E-mail: zvf03563@nifty.ne.jp

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the efficacies of para-aortic node (PAN) dissection for patients undergoing surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for endometrial carcinomas. Methods: At the Osaka University Hospital and the Kaizuka City Hospital in Osaka, Japan, either pelvic lymph nodes (PLN) plus para-aortic lymph nodes (PAN) or PLN-only dissections were performed for endometrial carcinomas. An adjuvant chemotherapy using paclitaxel, epirubicin, and carboplatin was conducted for all such patients. A retrospective comparison of the efficacy of PAN dissection was conducted. Results: Disease-free and overall survivals and frequency of PAN involvement at the first recurrence did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between the PLN-only group and the PLN + PAN group. Operation time was significantly longer in the PLN + PAN group than the PLN-only group, and the total blood loss was also significantly greater in the PLN+PAN group. Conclusion: PAN dissection may be omitted, without adverse effect on prognosis, for endometrial carcinoma patients with recurrence risks who undergo adjuvant chemotherapy using platinum, anthracycline and taxane derivatives.

Keywords

Endometrial carcinoma; Para-aortic lymph node dissection; Adjuvant chemotherapy; Prognosis

Cite and Share

M. Okazawa,Y. Ueda,T. Enomoto,K. Yoshino,K. Kono,S. Mabuchi,T. Kimura,M. Nagamatsu. A retrospective analysis of endometrial carcinoma cases surgically treated with or without para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012. 33(6);620-624.

References

[1] DiSaia P.J., Creasman W.T.: “Clinical Gynecologic Oncology”. 6th ed., St. Louis, Mosby, 2010.

[2] Berek J.S.: “Novak's Gynecology”. 13th ed. Baltimore, William and Wilkins, 2002.

[3] Ueda Y., Enomoto T., Miyatake T., Egawa-Takata T., Ugaki H., Yoshino K. et al.: “Endometrial carcinoma with extra-abdominal metastasis: improved prognosis following cytoreductive surgery”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2010, 17, 1111.

[4] Bristow R.E., Zerbe M.J., Rosenshein N.B., Grumbine F.C., Montz F.J.: “Stage IVB endometrial carcinoma: the role of cytoreductive surgery and determinants of survival”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 78, 85.

[5] Benedetti Panici P., Basile S., Maneschi F., Alberto Lissoni A., Signorelli M., Scambia G. et al.: “Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2008, 100, 1707.

[6] ASTEC study group, Kitchener H., Swart A.M., Qian Q., Amos C., Parmar M.K.: “Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study”. Lancet, 2009, 373, 125.

[7] Todo Y., Kato H., Kaneuchi M., Watari H., Takeda M., Sakuragi N.: “Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis”. Lancet, 2010, 375, 1165.

[8] Randall M.E., Filiaci V.L., Muss H., Spirtos N.M., Mannel R.S., Fowler J., Gynecologic Oncology Group Study: “Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2006, 24, 36.

[9] Muss H.B.: “Chemotherapy of metastatic endometrial cancer”. Semin. Oncol., 1994, 21, 107.

[10] Thigpen J.T., Brady M.F., Homesley H.D., Malfetano J., DuBeshter B., Burger R.A., Liao S.: “Phase III trial of doxorubicin with or without cisplatin in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2004, 22, 3902.

[11] Ball H.G., Blessing J.A., Lentz S.S., Mutch D.G.: “A phase II trial of paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1996, 62, 278.

[12] Lissoni A., Zanetta G., Losa G., Gabriele A., Parma G., Mangioni C.: “Phase II study of paclitaxel as salvage treatment in advanced endometrial cancer”. Ann. Oncol., 1996, 7, 861.

[13] Fleming G.F., Brunetto V.L., Cella D., Look K.Y., Reid G.C., Munkarah A.R. et al.: “Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus cisplatin with or without paclitaxel plus filgrastim in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2004, 22, 2159.

[14] Lissoni A., Gabriele A., Gorga G., Tumolo S., Landoni F, Mangioni C., Sessa C.: “Cisplatin-, epirubicin- and paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy in uterine adenocarcinoma”. Ann. Oncol., 1997, 8, 969.

[15] Papadimitriou C.A., Bafaloukos D., Bozas G., Kalofonos H., Kosmidis P., Aravantinos G. et al., Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group: “Paclitaxel, epirubicin, and carboplatin in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 110, 87.

[16] Egawa-Takata T., Ueda Y., Kuragaki C., Miyake T., Miyatake T., Fujita M. et al.: “Chemotherapy for endometrial carcinoma (GOGO-EM1 study): TEC (paclitaxel, epirubicin, and carboplatin) is an effective remission-induction and adjuvant therapy”. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 2011, 68, 1603. Address

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top