Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
A retrospective analysis of endometrial carcinoma cases surgically treated with or without para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaizuka City Hospital, Hori, Kaiduka, Osaka, Japan
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
*Corresponding Author(s): Y. Ueda E-mail: zvf03563@nifty.ne.jp
Purpose: To analyze the efficacies of para-aortic node (PAN) dissection for patients undergoing surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for endometrial carcinomas. Methods: At the Osaka University Hospital and the Kaizuka City Hospital in Osaka, Japan, either pelvic lymph nodes (PLN) plus para-aortic lymph nodes (PAN) or PLN-only dissections were performed for endometrial carcinomas. An adjuvant chemotherapy using paclitaxel, epirubicin, and carboplatin was conducted for all such patients. A retrospective comparison of the efficacy of PAN dissection was conducted. Results: Disease-free and overall survivals and frequency of PAN involvement at the first recurrence did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between the PLN-only group and the PLN + PAN group. Operation time was significantly longer in the PLN + PAN group than the PLN-only group, and the total blood loss was also significantly greater in the PLN+PAN group. Conclusion: PAN dissection may be omitted, without adverse effect on prognosis, for endometrial carcinoma patients with recurrence risks who undergo adjuvant chemotherapy using platinum, anthracycline and taxane derivatives.
Endometrial carcinoma; Para-aortic lymph node dissection; Adjuvant chemotherapy; Prognosis
M. Okazawa,Y. Ueda,T. Enomoto,K. Yoshino,K. Kono,S. Mabuchi,T. Kimura,M. Nagamatsu. A retrospective analysis of endometrial carcinoma cases surgically treated with or without para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012. 33(6);620-624.
[1] DiSaia P.J., Creasman W.T.: “Clinical Gynecologic Oncology”. 6th ed., St. Louis, Mosby, 2010.
[2] Berek J.S.: “Novak's Gynecology”. 13th ed. Baltimore, William and Wilkins, 2002.
[3] Ueda Y., Enomoto T., Miyatake T., Egawa-Takata T., Ugaki H., Yoshino K. et al.: “Endometrial carcinoma with extra-abdominal metastasis: improved prognosis following cytoreductive surgery”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2010, 17, 1111.
[4] Bristow R.E., Zerbe M.J., Rosenshein N.B., Grumbine F.C., Montz F.J.: “Stage IVB endometrial carcinoma: the role of cytoreductive surgery and determinants of survival”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 78, 85.
[5] Benedetti Panici P., Basile S., Maneschi F., Alberto Lissoni A., Signorelli M., Scambia G. et al.: “Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2008, 100, 1707.
[6] ASTEC study group, Kitchener H., Swart A.M., Qian Q., Amos C., Parmar M.K.: “Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study”. Lancet, 2009, 373, 125.
[7] Todo Y., Kato H., Kaneuchi M., Watari H., Takeda M., Sakuragi N.: “Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis”. Lancet, 2010, 375, 1165.
[8] Randall M.E., Filiaci V.L., Muss H., Spirtos N.M., Mannel R.S., Fowler J., Gynecologic Oncology Group Study: “Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2006, 24, 36.
[9] Muss H.B.: “Chemotherapy of metastatic endometrial cancer”. Semin. Oncol., 1994, 21, 107.
[10] Thigpen J.T., Brady M.F., Homesley H.D., Malfetano J., DuBeshter B., Burger R.A., Liao S.: “Phase III trial of doxorubicin with or without cisplatin in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2004, 22, 3902.
[11] Ball H.G., Blessing J.A., Lentz S.S., Mutch D.G.: “A phase II trial of paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1996, 62, 278.
[12] Lissoni A., Zanetta G., Losa G., Gabriele A., Parma G., Mangioni C.: “Phase II study of paclitaxel as salvage treatment in advanced endometrial cancer”. Ann. Oncol., 1996, 7, 861.
[13] Fleming G.F., Brunetto V.L., Cella D., Look K.Y., Reid G.C., Munkarah A.R. et al.: “Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus cisplatin with or without paclitaxel plus filgrastim in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2004, 22, 2159.
[14] Lissoni A., Gabriele A., Gorga G., Tumolo S., Landoni F, Mangioni C., Sessa C.: “Cisplatin-, epirubicin- and paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy in uterine adenocarcinoma”. Ann. Oncol., 1997, 8, 969.
[15] Papadimitriou C.A., Bafaloukos D., Bozas G., Kalofonos H., Kosmidis P., Aravantinos G. et al., Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group: “Paclitaxel, epirubicin, and carboplatin in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 110, 87.
[16] Egawa-Takata T., Ueda Y., Kuragaki C., Miyake T., Miyatake T., Fujita M. et al.: “Chemotherapy for endometrial carcinoma (GOGO-EM1 study): TEC (paclitaxel, epirubicin, and carboplatin) is an effective remission-induction and adjuvant therapy”. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 2011, 68, 1603. Address
Web of Science (WOS) (On Hold)
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition
Google Scholar
JournalSeek
Top