Article Data

  • Views 1276
  • Dowloads 105

Original Research

Open Access

A retrospective analysis of endometrial carcinoma cases surgically treated with or without para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy

  • M. Okazawa1
  • Y. Ueda1,*,
  • T. Enomoto2
  • K. Yoshino2
  • K. Kono2
  • S. Mabuchi2
  • T. Kimura2
  • M. Nagamatsu1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaizuka City Hospital, Hori, Kaiduka, Osaka, Japan

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo201206620 Vol.33,Issue 6,November 2012 pp.620-624

Published: 10 November 2012

*Corresponding Author(s): Y. Ueda E-mail: zvf03563@nifty.ne.jp

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the efficacies of para-aortic node (PAN) dissection for patients undergoing surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for endometrial carcinomas. Methods: At the Osaka University Hospital and the Kaizuka City Hospital in Osaka, Japan, either pelvic lymph nodes (PLN) plus para-aortic lymph nodes (PAN) or PLN-only dissections were performed for endometrial carcinomas. An adjuvant chemotherapy using paclitaxel, epirubicin, and carboplatin was conducted for all such patients. A retrospective comparison of the efficacy of PAN dissection was conducted. Results: Disease-free and overall survivals and frequency of PAN involvement at the first recurrence did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between the PLN-only group and the PLN + PAN group. Operation time was significantly longer in the PLN + PAN group than the PLN-only group, and the total blood loss was also significantly greater in the PLN+PAN group. Conclusion: PAN dissection may be omitted, without adverse effect on prognosis, for endometrial carcinoma patients with recurrence risks who undergo adjuvant chemotherapy using platinum, anthracycline and taxane derivatives.

Keywords

Endometrial carcinoma; Para-aortic lymph node dissection; Adjuvant chemotherapy; Prognosis

Cite and Share

M. Okazawa,Y. Ueda,T. Enomoto,K. Yoshino,K. Kono,S. Mabuchi,T. Kimura,M. Nagamatsu. A retrospective analysis of endometrial carcinoma cases surgically treated with or without para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2012. 33(6);620-624.

References

[1] DiSaia P.J., Creasman W.T.: “Clinical Gynecologic Oncology”. 6th ed., St. Louis, Mosby, 2010.

[2] Berek J.S.: “Novak's Gynecology”. 13th ed. Baltimore, William and Wilkins, 2002.

[3] Ueda Y., Enomoto T., Miyatake T., Egawa-Takata T., Ugaki H., Yoshino K. et al.: “Endometrial carcinoma with extra-abdominal metastasis: improved prognosis following cytoreductive surgery”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2010, 17, 1111.

[4] Bristow R.E., Zerbe M.J., Rosenshein N.B., Grumbine F.C., Montz F.J.: “Stage IVB endometrial carcinoma: the role of cytoreductive surgery and determinants of survival”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 78, 85.

[5] Benedetti Panici P., Basile S., Maneschi F., Alberto Lissoni A., Signorelli M., Scambia G. et al.: “Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial”. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 2008, 100, 1707.

[6] ASTEC study group, Kitchener H., Swart A.M., Qian Q., Amos C., Parmar M.K.: “Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study”. Lancet, 2009, 373, 125.

[7] Todo Y., Kato H., Kaneuchi M., Watari H., Takeda M., Sakuragi N.: “Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis”. Lancet, 2010, 375, 1165.

[8] Randall M.E., Filiaci V.L., Muss H., Spirtos N.M., Mannel R.S., Fowler J., Gynecologic Oncology Group Study: “Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2006, 24, 36.

[9] Muss H.B.: “Chemotherapy of metastatic endometrial cancer”. Semin. Oncol., 1994, 21, 107.

[10] Thigpen J.T., Brady M.F., Homesley H.D., Malfetano J., DuBeshter B., Burger R.A., Liao S.: “Phase III trial of doxorubicin with or without cisplatin in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2004, 22, 3902.

[11] Ball H.G., Blessing J.A., Lentz S.S., Mutch D.G.: “A phase II trial of paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1996, 62, 278.

[12] Lissoni A., Zanetta G., Losa G., Gabriele A., Parma G., Mangioni C.: “Phase II study of paclitaxel as salvage treatment in advanced endometrial cancer”. Ann. Oncol., 1996, 7, 861.

[13] Fleming G.F., Brunetto V.L., Cella D., Look K.Y., Reid G.C., Munkarah A.R. et al.: “Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus cisplatin with or without paclitaxel plus filgrastim in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2004, 22, 2159.

[14] Lissoni A., Gabriele A., Gorga G., Tumolo S., Landoni F, Mangioni C., Sessa C.: “Cisplatin-, epirubicin- and paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy in uterine adenocarcinoma”. Ann. Oncol., 1997, 8, 969.

[15] Papadimitriou C.A., Bafaloukos D., Bozas G., Kalofonos H., Kosmidis P., Aravantinos G. et al., Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group: “Paclitaxel, epirubicin, and carboplatin in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 110, 87.

[16] Egawa-Takata T., Ueda Y., Kuragaki C., Miyake T., Miyatake T., Fujita M. et al.: “Chemotherapy for endometrial carcinoma (GOGO-EM1 study): TEC (paclitaxel, epirubicin, and carboplatin) is an effective remission-induction and adjuvant therapy”. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 2011, 68, 1603. Address

Abstracted / indexed in

Web of Science (WOS) (On Hold)

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition

Google Scholar

JournalSeek

Submission Turnaround Time

Top