Article Data

  • Views 466
  • Dowloads 148

Original Research

Open Access

Diagnostic accuracy of 1.5 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in the pre operative assessment of axillary lymph nodes

  • C. de Felice1
  • V. Cipolla1
  • A. Stagnitti1
  • L.M. Porfiri1
  • D. Guerrieri1
  • A. Musella2
  • D. Santucci1
  • M.L. Meggiorini2,*,

1Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Rome, Italy

2Department of Gynaecological Sciences, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Rome, Italy

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo2663.2015 Vol.36,Issue 4,August 2015 pp.447-451

Published: 10 August 2015

*Corresponding Author(s): M.L. Meggiorini E-mail: marialetizia.meggiorini@uniroma1.it

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the accuracy of 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (1.5T MRI) in the preoperative evaluation of axillary lymph nodes in patients with invasive breast cancer. The authors retrospectively analyzed 26 patients with invasive breast cancer who had undergone sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and/or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). All patients had been submitted to preoperative contrast enhanced breast 1.5T MRI. On the basis of lymph nodes morphological and dynamic characteristics, lymph nodes were classified as “negative” (short axis < 5 mm), “borderline” (short axis > 5 mm, absence of a hilum) or “positive” (short axis > 5 mm, absence of a hilum and also other suspicious features). The authors compared 1.5T MRI results with the outcome of histological analysis performed according to the TNM criteria; sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 1.5T MRI were evaluated. Considering only the lymph nodes “positive”, 1.5 T MRI showed: SE 37.8%, SP 99.3%, FP 0.7%, PPV 92.5%, and NPV 88.1%. However, considering also “borderline”, 1.5T MRI achieved: SE 75.7%, SP 99.3%, FP 0.7%, PPV 96.1%, and NPV was 95%. Contrast enhanced breast 1.5T MRI is not yet a valid alternative to histological analysis but it is a valid tool for a preoperative study of the topography of axillary lymph nodes and has the potential to become a routine method for evaluating the metastatic lymph nodes before submission to ALND.

Keywords

Breast cancer; Axillary lymph nodes; Magnetic resonance imaging.

Cite and Share

C. de Felice,V. Cipolla,A. Stagnitti,L.M. Porfiri,D. Guerrieri,A. Musella,D. Santucci,M.L. Meggiorini. Diagnostic accuracy of 1.5 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in the pre operative assessment of axillary lymph nodes. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2015. 36(4);447-451.

References

[1] Nemoto T., Vana J., Bedwani R.N., Baker H.W., McGregor F.H., Murphy G.P.: “Management and survival of female breast cancer: results of a national survey by the American College of Surgeons”. Cancer, 1980, 45, 2917.

[2] Carter C.L., Allen C., Henson D.E.: “Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases”. Cancer, 1989, 63, 181.

[3] Clayton F., Hopkins C.L.: “Pathologic correlates of prognosis in lymph node-positive breast carcinomas”. Cancer, 1993, 71, 1780

[4] Moore M.P., Kinne D.W.: “Axillary lymphadenectomy: a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure”. J. Surg. Oncol., 1997, 66, 2.

[5] Silverstein M.J., Skinner K.A., Lomis T.J.: “Predicting axillary nodal positivity in 2282 patients with breast carcinoma”. World J. Surg., 2001, 25, 767.

[6] Kiricuta C.I., Tausch J.: “A mathematical model of axillary lymph node involvement based on 1446 complete axillary dissections in patients with breast carcinoma”. Cancer, 1992, 69, 2496.

[7] Lotze M.T., Duncan M.A., Gerber L.H., Woltering E.A., Rosenberg S.A.: “Early versus delayed shoulder motion following axillary dissection: a randomized prospective study”. Ann. Surg., 1981, 193, 288.

[8] Yeoh E.K., Denham J.W., Davies S.A., Spittle M.F.: “Primary breast cancer. Complications of axillary management”. Acta Radiol. Oncol., 1986, 25, 105.

[9] Siegel B.M., Mayzel K.A., Love S.M.: “Level I and II axillary dissection in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer. An analysis of 259 consecutive patients”. Arch. Surg., 1990, 125, 1144.

[10] Shaw J.H., Rumball E.M.: “Complications and local recurrence following lymphadenectomy”. Br. J. Surg., 1990, 77, 760.

[11] Ivens D., Hoe A.L., Podd T.J., Hamilton C.R., Taylor I., Royle G.T.: “Assessment of morbidity from complete axillary dissection”. Br. J. Cancer, 1992, 66, 136.

[12] Lin P.P., Allison D.C., Wainstock J., Miller K.D., Dooley W.C., Friedman N., et al.: “Impact of axillary lymph node dissection on the therapy of breast cancer patients”. J. Clin. Oncol., 1993, 11, 1536.

[13] Maunsell E., Brisson J., Deschênes L.: “Arm problems and psychological distress after surgery for breast cancer”. Can. J. Surg., 1993, 36, 315.

[14] Hack T.F., Cohen L., Katz J., Robson L.S., Goss, P.: “Physical and psychological morbidity after axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 1999, 17, 143.

[15] Velanovich V., Szymanski W.: “Quality of life of breast cancer patients with lymphedema”. Am. J. Surg., 1999, 177, 184.

[16] Veronesi U., Paganelli G., Viale G., Luini A., Zurrida S., Galimberti V., et al.: “A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2003, 349, 546.

[17] Lucci A., McCall L.M., Beitsch P.D., Whitworth P.W., Reintgen D. S., Blumencranz P.W. et al.: “Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0011”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2007, 25, 3657.

[18] Krag D.N., Anderson S.J., Julian T.B., Brown A.M., Harlow S.P., Costantino J.P., et al.: “Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial”. Lancet Oncol., 2010, 11, 927.

[19] Davies G.C., Millis R.R., Hayward J.L.: “Assessment of axillary lymph node status”. Ann. Surg., 1980, 192, 148.

[20] Lyman G.H., Giuliano A.E., Somerfield M.R., Benson A.B. 3rd, Bodurka D.C., Burstein H.J. et al.: “American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2005, 23, 7703.

[21] Edge S.B., Byrd D.R., Compton C.C., Fritz A.G., Greene F.L. Trotti A., (eds): “AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook”, 7th ed. New York: Springer, 2011.

[22] Greene F.L., Page D.L., Fleming I.D., Fritz A., Balch C.M., Haller D.G., Morrow M., (eds): “AJCC Cancer Staging Manual”, 6th ed. New York: Springer, 2002.

[23] Sobin L.H., Gospodarowicz M.K., Wittekind C., (eds): “International Union Against Cancer. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours”, 6th ed. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

[24] Bilimoria K.Y., Bentrem D.J., Hansen N.M., Bethke K.P., Rademaker A.W., Ko C.Y., et al.: “Comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy alone and completion axillary lymph node dissection for node-positive breast cancer”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2009, 27, 2946.

[25] Mann R.M., Kuhl C.K., Kinkel K., Boetes C.: “Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging”. Eur. Radiol., 2008, 18, 1307.

[26] Giuliano A.E., McCall L., Beitsch P., Whitworth P.W., Blumencranz P., Leitch A.M., et al.: “Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial”. Ann. Surg., 2010, 252, 426.

[27] Diaconu C., Livadariu R.M., Dogaru C.: “The risk of lymphedema after breast cancer surgical treatment”. Rev. Med. Chir. Soc. Med. Nat. Iasi., 2012, 116, 1081.

[28] Hayes S. C., Johansson K., Stout N.L., Prosnitz R., Armer J.M., Gabram S., et al.: “Upper-body morbidity after breast cancer: incidence and evidence for evaluation, prevention, and management within a prospective surveillance model of care”. Cancer, 2012, 118, 2237.

[29] Sayko O., Pezzin L. E., Yen T.W.F., Nattinger A.B.: “Diagnosis and treatment of lymphedema after breast cancer: a population-based study”. PM R., 2013, 5, 915. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 May 17.

[30] Kvistad K.A., Rydland J., Smethurst H.B., Lundgren S., Fjøsne H.E., et al.: “Axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: preoperative detection with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI”. Eur. Radiol., 2000, 10, 1464,

[31] Scaranelo A.M., Eiada R., Jacks L.M., Kulkarni S.R., Crystal P.: “Accuracy of unenhanced MR imaging in the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis: study of reproducibility and reliability”. Radiology, 2012, 262, 425.

[32] Matsuoka A., Minato M., Harada M., Kubo H., Bandou Y., Tangoku A., et al.: “Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusionweighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer”. Radiat. Med., 2008, 26, 15.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top