Article Data

  • Views 2011
  • Dowloads 124

Original Research

Open Access

Tracking of cervical cancer in 7,519 patients: a study of the prevalence of altered cytologies

  • C.R. de Souza Bezerra Sakano1
  • J. Chamorro Lascasas Ribalta2
  • P. Zucchi3,*,

1Pathology Department, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), São Paulo, Brazil

2Gynecology Department, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), São Paulo, Brazil

3Interdepartmental Health Economics Group (GRIDES), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), São Paulo, Brazil

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo2687.2015 Vol.36,Issue 4,August 2015 pp.437-441

Published: 10 August 2015

*Corresponding Author(s): P. Zucchi E-mail: pzucchi@cpes.org.br

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the outcome and adherence of 535 patients with cytological changes. Materials and Methods: Study of 7519 smear tests harvested in 2007. Results: Of the 7,519 (100%) patients analyzed, 6,964 (92.6%) had cytology negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy, 535 (7.1%) abnormalities in epithelial cells, and 20 (0.3%) were unsatisfactory. Of these 535 (100%) patients, 511 (95.5%) were referred to the outpatient clinic and colposcopic exam submitted and 24 (4.5%) did not return to the clinic. The group participated in the ambulatory visits, 302 (59.1%) underwent colposcopy-guided biopsy, and the remaining 209 (40.9%) examinations were negative. Conclusion: The cytological examination remains the method of choice for cervical cancer screening. It includes low costs, is effective, and well-accepted. Early diagnosis minimises the cost of research. Universities have an important role in the training of health professionals and also in the development of research.

Keywords

Uterine cervical neoplasm; Biopsy; Cytopathology; Screening.

Cite and Share

C.R. de Souza Bezerra Sakano,J. Chamorro Lascasas Ribalta,P. Zucchi. Tracking of cervical cancer in 7,519 patients: a study of the prevalence of altered cytologies. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2015. 36(4);437-441.

References

[1] Papanicolaou G.N., Traut H.F.: “The diagnostic value of vaginal smears in carcinoma of the uterus”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1941, 42, 193.

[2] INCA – (Instituto Nacional de Câncer), 2012: “Estimativa 2012 – Incidência de Câncer no Brasil”. Available at: http://portal.saude.sp.gov.br/resources/ses/perfil/gestor/homepage/estimativas-deincidencia-de-cancer-2012/estimativas_incidencia_cancer_2012.pdf

[3] Union for International Cancer Control (UICC): “Global Cancer Control – Programmes - Cancer Cervical initiative (CCI)”. Available at: http://www.uicc.org/programmes/cci

[4] Meisels A., Morin C.: “Human papillomavirus and cancer of the uterine cervix”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1981, 12, S111.

[5] Zür Hausen H., Villiers E.M., Gissmann L.: “Papillomavirus infection and human gentital cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1981, 12, 124.

[6] Pater M.M., Pater A.: “Human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 sequences in carcinoma cell lines of the cervix”. Virology, 1985, 145, 313.

[7] Zür Hausen H.: “Human pathogenic papillomaviruses”. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol., 1991, 186, 634.

[8] Restrepo H.E., González J., Roberts E., Litvak J.: “Epidemiologia y control del cáncer del cuello uterino en América Latina y el Caribe”. Bol. Oficin. Sanit. Panam., 1987, 102, 578.

[9] Lazcano-Ponce E.C., Hernández-Avila M., López-Carrillo L., Alonso de Ruiz P., Torres-Lombaton A., Gonzales-Lira G., Rumieu I.: “Reproductive risk factors and sexual history associated with cervical cancer in Mexico”. Rev. Invest. Clin., 1995, 47, 377.

[10] Caetano R., Caetano C.M.M.: “Custo-efetividade no diagnóstico precoce do câncer de colo uterino no Brasil: Um estudo exploratório, 2005”. Available at: http://www.inca.gov.br/inca/Arquivos/HPV/relatorio

[11] Programa Nacional de Controle do Câncer do Colo do Útero. Available at: http://www2.inca.gov.br/wps/wcm/connect/9ab3788046aa6903a610ff0d18967bc0/pdf_pncc_coloutero.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=9ab”3788046aa6903a610ff0d18967bc0

[12] David A.S.: Rastreamento e Detecção Precoce”. In: Pollock R.E., Doroshow J.H., Khayat D., Nakao A., O’Sullivan B. (eds). Manual de Oncologia Clínica da UICC. 8th ed. São Paulo: John Wiley, Fundação Oncocentro de São Paulo, 2006, 139.

[13] Linard A.G., Dantas e Silva F.A., Silva R.M.: “Mulheres submetidas a tratamento para câncer de colo uterino – percepção de como enfrentam a realidade”. Rev. Bras. Cancerol., 2002, 48, 493.

[14] Medeiros V.C.R.D., Medeiros R.C., Moraes L.M., Menezes Filho J.B., Ramos E.S.N., Saturnino A.C.R.D.: “Câncer de colo uterino: Análise Epidemiológica e Citopatológica no Estado do Rio Grande do “. RBAC, 2005, 37, 227.

[15] Rama C., Roteli-Martins C., Derchain S., Longatto-Filho A., Gontijo R., Sarian L., et al.: “Rastreamento anterior para câncer de colo uterino em mulheres com alterações citológicas ou histológicas”. Rev. Saúde Pública, 2008, 42, 411.

[16] Aquino E.M.L., Carvalho A.I., Faerstein E., Ribeiro D.C.S.: “Situação atual da detecção precoce do câncer cérvico-uterino no Brasil”. Cad. Saúde Pública, 1986, 2, 53.

[17] Ostor A.G.: “Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 1993, 12, 186.

[18] Hutchinson M.L., Berger B.M., Farber F.L.: “Clinical and cost implications of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: the impact of test sensitivity”. Am. J. Manag. Care, 2000, 6, 766.

[19] Ministerio da Saúde, Brasil / Instituto Nacional de Câncer, 2002: “Falando sobre câncer de colo uterino, Rio de Janeiro”. Available at: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicações/inca/falando_cancer_colo_utero.pdf

[20] Thuler L.C.S., Zardo L.M., Zeferino L.C.: “Perfil dos laboratórios de citopatologia do Sistema Único de Saúde”. J. Bras. Patol. Lab., 2007, 43, 103.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top