Modified radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical cancer treatment

Objectives: The aim of this study was to modify vaginal radical hysterectomy (VRH), design a series of surgical instruments specialised for this procedure, and to study the feasibility, morbidity, and outcome of cervical cancer patients treated with modified laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH). Materials and Methods:A total of 86 patients with early-stage cervical cancer (IB1–IIA1) underwent modified VRH and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Special instruments and modified procedures were used in VRH. Data were collected on operating time, blood loss, ureter separation time, nodal count, hospital stay, and complication recurrence and survival rates. Results: All patients successfully completed LARVH. Median operating time was 238 minutes, mean blood loss was 283 ml, median time for ureter separation was 18.5 minutes, median time to post-operative exhaustion was 23 hours, urine recovery was 10.3 days, and median hospital stay was 9.2 days. On average, 23.2 lymph nodes were harvested. Except for one case of left internal iliac vein with intraoperative and postoperative complications, no other major complications occurred, particularly no bladder and ureter injury. Surgical margins were negative in all cases. After median follow-up of 46 months, recurrence rate and overall survival for 84 patients were 3.57% and 97.62%, respectively. Discussion: Modified VRH with laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy is an oncologically valid alternative for early stage cervical cancer treatment with minimal intraoperative and postoperative complications. The modification of this procedure and special instruments can enhance the feasibility and the safety of treatment.

Radical vaginal hysterectomy; Cervical cancer; Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy.

[1] Reade C.J., Eiriksson L.R., Covens A.: “Surgery for early stage cervical cancer: how radical should it be?” Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 31, 222.

[2] Geetha P., Nair M.K.: “Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of rad-ical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review”. J. Minim. Access. Surg., 2012, 8, 67.

[3] Mehra G., Weekes A., Vantrappen P., Visvanathan D., Jeyarajah A.: “Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical car-cinoma: Morbidity and long-term follow-up”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2010, 36, 304.

[4] Roy M., Plante M.: “Place of Schauta’s radical vaginal hysterectomy”. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2011, 25, 227.

[5] Dargent D., Mathevet P.: “Schauta’s vaginal hysterectomy combined with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy”. Baillieres. Clin. Obstet. Gy-naecol., 1995, 9, 691.

[6] Querleu D., Leblanc E., Ferron G., Narducci F., Martel P.: “Laparo-scopic surgery in gynaecological tumors”. Bull. Cancer, 2006, 93, 783.(in French).

[7] Morgan D.J., Hunter D.C., McCracken G., McClelland H.R., Price J.H., Dobbs S.P.: “Is laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma safe? A case control study with follow up”. BJOG., 2007, 114, 537.

[8] Zakashansky K., Bradley W.H., Nezhat F.R.: “New techniques in rad-ical hysterectomy”. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 2008, 20, 14.

[9] Gottschalk E., Lanowska M., Chiantera V., Marnitz S., Schneider A., Brink-Spalink V., et al.: “Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hys-terectomy: rationale, technique, results”. JSLS., 2011, 15, 451.

[10] Hertel H., Köhler C., Michels W., Possover M., Tozzi R., Schneider A.: “Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH): prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2003, 90, 505.

[11] Querleu D., Leblanc E., Castelain B.: “Laparoscopic pelvic lym-phadenectomy in the staging of early carcinoma of the cervix”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1991, 164, 579.

[12] Sharma R., Bailey J., Anderson R., Murdoch J.: “Laparoscopically as-sisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (Coelio-Schauta): a comparison with open Wertheim/Meigs hysterectomy”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer., 2006; 16, 1927.

[13] Naik R., Jackson K.S., Lopes A., Cross P., Henry J.A.: “Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hys-terectomy—a randomised phase II trial: perioperative outcomes and surgicopathological measurements”. BJOG., 2010, 117, 746.

[14] Choi C.H., Lee J.W., Lee Y.Y., Kim H.J., Song T., Kim M.K., et al.: “Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2012, 19, 3839.

[15] Yu J.J., Yang W.X., Wang X.M.: “Laparoscopically-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy with five years follow-up: a case control study”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2013, 34, 156.

[16] Roy M., Plante M., Renaud M.C.: “Laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy”. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol., 2005, 19, 377.

[17] Angioli R., Martin J., Heffernan T., Massi G.: “Radical vaginal hys-terectomy classic and modified”. Surg. Clin. North. Am., 2001, 81, 829.

[18] Pergialiotis V., Rodolakis A., Christakis D., Thomakos N., Vlachos G., Antsaklis A.: “Laparoscopically assivted caginal radical hysterectomy: systematic review of the literature”. J. Minim. Invasive. Gynecol., 2013, 20, 745.

[19] Bader A.A., Bjelic-Radisic V., Tamussino K.F., Pristauz G., Winter R.: “Recurrence in a Schuchardt incision after Schauta-Amreich radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2006, 16, 1479.