Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Can the histopathology influence the outcome of early-stage cervical cancer?
1The Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Department of Radiotherapy, Warsaw, Poland
2The Holy Family Hospital, Gynecological Oncology Department, Warsaw, Poland
*Corresponding Author(s): J. Jonska–Gmyrek E-mail: jonska@wp.pl
Purpose of investigation: The assessment of the histology influence on survival in early-stage cervical cancer patients treated with surgery. Materials and Methods: The retrospective analysis of 71 cervical adenocarcinoma (AC), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage IB, treated initially with surgery, between 1989 and 1999 and 43 squamous cell cancer (SCC) patients, treated with the same method, between 1998 and 1999, was performed. Cox multi-variant analysis and the Kaplan-Meyer methods were performed (the level of statistical significance, p ≤ 0.05). Results: The ten-year overall survival (OS) of AC and SCC patients was 67.5% and 90%, p = 0.015. The ten-year disease free survival (DFS) was 63% and 85%, p = 0.022, respectively. After adjusting the significant prognostic factors, patients with AC had significantly worse treatment outcomes than patients with SCC: DFS (relative risk (RR)1.85, 95% CI = 1.28-2.69, p = 0.001) and OS (RR 1.65, 95% CI = 1.65-2.33, p = 0.005). Conclusion: Prognosis of early cervical AC patients, treated with surgery, appears to be less favorable as compared to patients with SCC, treated with the same method.
Cervical cancer; Adenocarcinoma; Squamous cell cancer; Radiotherapy; Surgery; Treatment outcomes.
J. Jonska–Gmyrek,A. Zolciak–Siwinska,L. Gmyrek. Can the histopathology influence the outcome of early-stage cervical cancer?. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2016. 37(2);178-181.
[1] Liu S., Semenciw R., Probert A., Mao Y.: “Cervical cancer in Canada: changing patterns in incidence and mortality”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2001, 11, 24.
[2] Sasieni P., Adams J.: “Changing rates of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix in England”. Lancet, 2001, 12, 1490.
[3] Krane J.F., Granter S.R., Trask C.E., Hogan C.L., Lee K.R.: “Papanicolau smear sensitivity for the detection of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: a study of 49 cases”. Cancer, 2001, 93, 8.
[4] Mathew A., George P.S.: “Trends in incidence and mortality rates of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of cervix—worldwide”. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev., 2009, 10, 645.
[5] Liu S., Semenciw R., Mayo.: “Cervical cancer: the increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in younger women”. CMAJ, 2001, 164, 1151.
[6] Ayhan A., Al R.A., Baykal C., Demirtas E., Yüce K., Ayhan A.: “A comparison of prognoses of FIGO stage IB adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma”. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2004, 14, 279.
[7] Waldenstrōm A.C., Horvath G.: “Survival of patients with adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in western Sweden”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 1999, 9, 18.
[8] Shingleton H.M., Bell M.C., Fremgen A., Chmiel J.S., Russell A.H., Jones W.B., Winchester D.P., Clive R.E.: “Is there a really difference in survival of women with squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the cervix?”. Cancer, 1995, 76, 1948.
[9] Eifel P.J, Morris M., Oswald M.J., Wharton J,T., Delclos L.: “Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Prognosis and patterns of failure in 367 cases”. Cancer, 1990, 65, 2507.
[10] Arvas. M.: “ Section IV: Invasive diseases. Early stage cervical cancers”. In: Ayhan A., Gultekin M., Dursun P.,(eds). Textbook of Gynecological Oncology. Ankara: Günes Publishing, 2010, 157.
[11] Nakanishi T., Ishikawa H., Suzuki Y., Inoue T., Nakamura S., Kuzuya K.: “A comparison of prognoses of pathologic stage Ib adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 79, 289.
[12] Lai C.H., Hsueh S., Hong J.H., Chang T.C., Tseng CJ., Chou H.H., et al.: “Are adenocarcinomas and adenosquamous carcinomas different from squamous carcinoma in stage IB and II cervical cancer patients undergoing primary radical surgery?”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 1999, 9, 28.
[13] Ayhan A., Yüce K., Tuncer Z.S., Urman B., Ayhan A.: “Stage I adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: tumor size, grade, lymph node metastases and 5-year survival”. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1989, 29, 443.
[14] Park J.Y., Kim D.Y., Kim J.H., Kim Y.M., Kim Y.T., Nam J.H.: “Outcomes after radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix”. Br. J. Cancer, 2010, 102, 1692.
[15] Ishikawa H., Nakanishi T., Inoue T., Kuzuya K.: “Prognostic factors of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1999, 73, 42.
[16] Galic V., Herzog T.J., Lewin S.N., Neugut A.I., Burke W.M., Lu Y.S., et al.: “Prognostic significance of adenocarcinoma histology in women with cervical cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 125, 287.
[17] Huang YT., Wang CC., Tsai CS., Lai C.H., Chang T.C., Chou H.H., et al.: “Long-term outcome and prognostic factors for adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma of cervix after definitive radiotherapy”. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2011, 80, 429.
[18] Kasuya G., Ogawa K., Iraha S., Nagai Y., Hirakawa M., Toita T., et al.: “Postoperative radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer: impact of lymph node and histological type on survival”. Anticancer Res., 2013, 33, 2199.
[19] Rudtanasudjatum K., Charoenkwan K., Khunamornpong S., Siriaunkgul S.: “Impact of histology on prognosis of patients with early-stage cervical cancer treated with radical surgery”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2011, 115, 183.
[20] Lee Y.Y., Choi C.H., Kim T.J., Lee J.W., Kim B.G., Lee J.H., Bae D. S.: “A comparison of pure adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA”. Gy-necol. Oncol., 2011, 120, 439.
Top