Article Data

  • Views 452
  • Dowloads 130

Case Reports

Open Access

Do we understand the pathophysiology of endometrial cancer?

  • V.L. Parker1,*,
  • P. Sanderson1
  • D. Raw2
  • K. Farag1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Barnsley Hospital, Barnsley, United Kingdom

2Department of Radiology, Barnsley Hospital, Barnsley, United Kingdom

DOI: 10.12892/ejgo2760.2015 Vol.36,Issue 5,October 2015 pp.595-598

Published: 10 October 2015

*Corresponding Author(s): V.L. Parker E-mail: victoria.beckett@cantab.net

Abstract

Endometrial carcinoma is the fourth most common cancer in UK women. Previous literature describes local, haematological or lymphatic dissemination to common sites including vaginal vault, lungs, liver, bones and brain. The authors present two unusual cases of endometrial cancer metastases to the psoas major muscle and laparoscopic port sites. Case 1 involves a 71-year-old female who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and peritoneal washings (TAH, BSO, PW) for Grade 1 endometrial cancer, Stage 1B. Three years later she represented with lower back and right hip pain, with MRI imaging revealing psoas muscle metastases. Case 2 describes a 60-year-old female who underwent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), BSO+ PW for Grade 1 endometrial cancer, Stage 1B. Three years postoperatively she presented with a lateral abdominal mass overlying the laparoscopic port site scar, which was Grade 1 endometrial cancer on biopsy. These rare metastatic locations question our traditional understanding of the pathophysiology of endometrial carcinoma.

Keywords

Endometrial cancer; Dissemination; Psoas major muscle; Laparoscopic port site.

Cite and Share

V.L. Parker,P. Sanderson,D. Raw,K. Farag. Do we understand the pathophysiology of endometrial cancer?. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2015. 36(5);595-598.

References

[1] National Cancer Institute: “Endometrial cancer treatment PDQ; Gen-eral information about endometrial cancer; 2014”. Available at: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/endometrial/Heal thProfessional/page1

[2] Creasman W.T., Odicino F., Maisonneuve P., Quinn M.A., Beller U., Benedet J.L., et al.: “Carcinoma of the corpus uteri. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer”. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2006, 95, S105.

[3] Cancer Research UK: “Cancer statistics; Endometrial Cancer”. London: Cancer Research U.K, 2011.

[4] Bokhman J.V.: “Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1983, 15, 10.

[5] Amant F., Moerman P., Neven P., Timmerman D., Van Limbergen E., Vergote I.: “Endometrial cancer”. Lancet, 2005, 366, 491.

[6] AlHilli M.M., Mariani A.: “The role of paraaortic lymphadenec-tomy in endometrial cancer”. Int. J. Clin. Oncol., 2013, 18, 193.

[7] Morgan-Parkes J.H.: “Metastases: mechanisms, pathways, and cascades”. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol., 1995, 164, 1075.

[8] Faught W., Fung Kee Fung M.: “Port site recurrences following la-paroscopically managed early stage endometrial cancer”. Int. J. Gy-necol. Cancer, 1999, 9, 256.

[9] Kadar N.: “Port-site recurrences following laparoscopic operations for gynaecological malignancies”. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1997, 104, 1308.

[10] Kim B., Huh S.J., Kim B.G.: “Port site metastasis after robotic-as-sisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for uterine cervical cancer: a case report and literature review”. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2013, 52, 558.

[11] Lönnerfors C., Bossmar T., Persson J.: “Portsite metastases follow-ing robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for gynecological malignancies”. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 2013, 92, 1361.

[12] Martínez A., Querleu D., Leblanc E., Narducci F., Ferron G.: “Low incidence of port-site metastases after laparoscopic staging of uterine cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, 118, 145.

[13] Muntz H.G., Goff B.A., Madsen B.L., Yon J.L.: “Port-site recurrence after laparoscopic surgery for endometrial carcinoma”. Obstet. Gy-necol., 1999, 93, 807.

[14] Nagarsheth N.P., Rahaman J., Cohen C.J., Gretz H., Nezhat F.: “The incidence of port-site metastases in gynecologic cancers”. JSLS, 2004, 8, 133.

[15] Ndofor B.T., Soliman P.T., Schmeler K.M., Nick A.M., Frumovitz M., Ramirez P.T.: “Rate of port-site metastasis is uncommon in pa-tients undergoing robotic surgery for gynecological malignancies”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2011, 21, 936.

[16] Rauff S., Ng J.S.: “Portsite recurrence in a patient undergoing robot-assisted gynecologic cancer surgery for endometrial cancer - A case report”. Gynecol. Oncol. Case Rep., 2012, 2, 127.

[17] Sanjuán A., Hernández S., Pahisa J., Ayuso J.R., Torné A., Martínez Román S., et al.: “Port-site metastasis after laparoscopic surgery for endometrial carcinoma: two case reports”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 96, 539.

[18] Wang P.H., Yen M.S., Yuan C.C., Chao K.C., Ng H.T., Lee W.L., et al.: “Port site metastasis after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: possible mechanisms and pre-vention”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1997, 66, 151.

[19] Wang P.H., Yuan C.C., Lin G., Ng H.T., Chao H.T.: “Risk factors contributing to early occurrence of port site metastases of laparoscopic surgery for malignancy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1999, 72, 38.

[20] Thomas C.G.: “Tumor cell contamination of the surgical wound: experimental and clinical observations”. Ann. Surg., 1961, 153, 697.

[21] Sugarbaker P.H., Cunliffe W.J., Belliveau J., de Bruijn E.A., Graves T., Mullins R.E., et al.: “Rationale for integrating early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy into the surgical treatment of gas-trointestinal cancer”. Semin. Oncol., 1989, 16, 83.

[22] Stewart C.J., Doherty D.A., Havlat M., Koay M.H., Leung Y.C., Naran A., et al.: “Transtubal spread of endometrial carcinoma: correlation of intraluminal tumour cells with tumour grade, peritoneal fluid cytol-ogy, and extra-uterine metastasis”. Pathology, 2013, 45, 382.

[23] Soslow R.A., Pirog E., Isacson C.: “Endometrial intraepithelial car-cinoma with associated peritoneal carcinomatosis”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2000, 24, 726.

[24] Abeler V.M., Vergote I.B., Kjørstad K.E., Tropé C.G.: “Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium. Prognosis and metastatic pattern”. Cancer, 1996, 78, 1740.

[25] Revel A., Tsafrir A., Anteby S.O., Shushan A.: “Does hysteroscopy produce intraperitoneal spread of endometrial cancer cells?” Obstet. Gynecol. Surv., 2004, 59, 280.

[26] Obermair A., Geramou M., Gücer F., Denison U., Graf A.H., Kap-shammer E., et al.: “Impact of hysteroscopy on disease-free survival in clinically stage I endometrial cancer patients”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2000, 10, 275.

[27] Takac I., Zegura B.: “Office hysteroscopy and the risk of microscopic extrauterine spread in endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 107, 94.

[28] Zerbe M.J., Zhang J., Bristow R.E., Grumbine F.C., Abularach S., Montz F.J.: “Retrograde seeding of malignant cells during hysteroscopy in presumed early endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2000, 79, 55.

[29] Djurdjević S., Mladenović-Segedi L., Djolai M.: “Endometrical can-cer metastases in the region of abdominal muscles and pelvic wall”. J. BUON., 2006, 11, 75.

[30] Neuhaus S.J., Watson D.I., Ellis T., Dodd T., Rofe A.M., Jamieson G. G.: “Efficacy of cytotoxic agents for the prevention of laparo-scopic port-site metastases”. Arch. Surg., 1998, 133, 762.

[31] Santeufemia D.A., Lumachi F., Basso S.M., Tumolo S., Re G.L., Capobianco G., et al.: “Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy as salvage treatment for a late wound recurrence of endometrial cancer”. Anticancer Res., 2013, 33, 1041.

[32] Galaal K., Bryant A., Fisher A.D., Al-Khaduri M., Kew F., Lopes A.D.: “Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer”. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2012, 9. CD006655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub2.

[33] Mo X., Yang Y., Lai H., Xiao J., He K., Chen J., Lin Y.: “Does car-bon dioxide pneumoperitoneum enhance wound metastases following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery? A meta-analysis of 20 randomized control studies”. Tumour Biol., 2014, 35, 7351. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-1812-5. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

[34] Kuhry E., Schwenk W., Gaupset R., Romild U., Bonjer J.: “Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials”. Cancer Treat. Rev., 2008, 34, 498.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top